Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 25 2021 03:08pm)
doing something about the "antifa problem" costs money, canceling a speech is free.
where does the money come from?
you're being evasive and only offering platitudes in line with a general goal. you're not dealing with the realities in the real world examples im laying out for you.
your first post made it seem like it was a moral free speech issue, tagged along with a liberal censorship dogma, when in reality its far more financial. and these speakers love when they get their speeches cancelled, they sell a lot more merch and books.
To take a step back, universities have traditionally enjoyed a lot of social credit as institutions of learning which promote freedom of thought. That is their "value add" to society, or their add to public discourse. If universities are no longer capable of doing that, for whatever reason, be it cowardice or something else, then the compelling interest the public had in universities disappears. Because they are valuable in their original role, however, we probably want to try offsetting the negative costs of antifa (e.g. bad publicity, violence, increased security costs) with negative costs of our own (e.g. loss of funding).
This is a problem concerning power. We can't expect universities to hold the line on their own, that would require they be staffed with men and women of far greater moral fiber than exists in the world today. We need to assume that they will be cowardly, and incompetent, and treat them accordingly.