d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Are Taxes Theft?
Prev1151617181920Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 4,802
Joined: Feb 6 2020
Gold: 347.20
May 28 2021 05:51am
Quote (Plaguefear @ May 28 2021 07:50am)
I think some jobs are worth more than others, doctors, scientists, vetinarians, not "mining corporation owner" or "exploiter of workers".
No one became a billionaire because they worked hard, every billionaire figured out a way to exploit other people or steal resources to get there.
Except satoshi.


These jobs are not that important. If they were, they would be paid more than someone who throw a ball in a net for living.
Member
Posts: 20,253
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,267.97
May 28 2021 05:55am
Nobody forces you to live in a country where you don't like the tax system.

But if you're going to have a job in a framework that was created by others and funded by others, it's perfectly natural that you contribute. By saying "taxes == theft" you're not proving anything, other than that you're trying to be an edgelord.
Member
Posts: 16,254
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
May 28 2021 06:10am
Quote (Plaguefear @ May 28 2021 07:33pm)
Billionaires without exception exist due to exploitation, if there is billionaires and homeless within the same society then the society has failed, its simple, we allow people to be exploited for the good of the few, a society should protect the good of the many.


I think you are trying really hard to knock on the rich. Now that's a mind of a sore loser, because to have that much wealth you need to provide a world with some extraordinary product and or service, (aka value). Now there is alot of exploitation happening and that will never change as long as greed exists. You cannot mandate greed or love with laws. Because you are trying to solve a spiritual problem with political means which is why idealistic left mostly young students haven't realised.

Here you are full of generalised not well thought of opinions, wildly throwing at other random on a gaming forum hoping it sticks. Maybe make yourself feel better idk.

I would focus on providing positive information or something constructive instead of endlessly venting
Member
Posts: 4,802
Joined: Feb 6 2020
Gold: 347.20
May 28 2021 06:15am
Quote (addone @ May 28 2021 08:10am)
I think you are trying really hard to knock on the rich. Now that's a mind of a sore loser, because to have that much wealth you need to provide a world with some extraordinary product and or service, (aka value). Now there is alot of exploitation happening and that will never change as long as greed exists. You cannot mandate greed or love with laws. Because you are trying to solve a spiritual problem with political means which is why idealistic left mostly young students haven't realised.

Here you are full of generalised not well thought of opinions, wildly throwing at other random on a gaming forum hoping it sticks. Maybe make yourself feel better idk.

I would focus on providing positive information or something constructive instead of endlessly venting


He's right tho.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
May 28 2021 06:43am
Quote (Plaguefear @ May 28 2021 01:24am)
Yes it does, if you are having your wages stolen and stealing them back it is 100% justified.


Quote (Thor123422 @ May 28 2021 01:26am)
Disagree. If you are being stolen from then stealing it back is not theft, especially when it would require far more resources as a proportion for you to prosecute for wage theft compared to their defense of it, assuming it was a large company.


Vigilante justice is not good for society. Taking justice into your own hands becauae you feel the justice system has failed might feel satisfactory but it can quickly lead down a path of violence and crime because it is not a measured response and there is no due process.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 28 2021 06:58am
Quote (Santara @ May 28 2021 05:51am)
A person who chooses to use force to take what hey want from another does not lend the characteristic "rightful" to their possession of what they took. They have taken it, and hold the power to do with it as they please, but the state of rightfulness is not conferred. Rightful is derived from reason, just as natural rights are. If I get on a plane to China and steal something from someone there, and I have never participated in their social contract, that doesn't mean what I have done is right, or that they have no claim to put me through their courts to punish me for my behavior. If I produce something of value, and you use force to take some of it from me - even with (empty) promises to return it to me through your choices of "investment," the decision to take is yours and reason dictates that without my consent, you have stolen it.


If you are in a society you are in state 3. If you arent you are in state 2. In absence of any agreement between parties the only right is the right of force. The rightful owner is not something you can conclude with pure reason. It depends on the rules of ownership and without rules there is merely force.


Quote (duffman316 @ May 28 2021 07:43am)
Vigilante justice is not good for society. Taking justice into your own hands becauae you feel the justice system has failed might feel satisfactory but it can quickly lead down a path of violence and crime because it is not a measured response and there is no due process.


Of course society must try to get people to use the courts for the purpose of stability but that doesnt change that you cant steal what is yours.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 28 2021 06:59am
Member
Posts: 4,802
Joined: Feb 6 2020
Gold: 347.20
May 28 2021 07:04am
Quote (Thor123422 @ May 28 2021 08:58am)
If you are in a society you are in state 3. If you arent you are in state 2. In absence of any agreement between parties the only right is the right of force. The rightful owner is not something you can conclude with pure reason. It depends on the rules of ownership and without rules there is merely force.




Of course society must try to get people to use the courts for the purpose of stability but that doesnt change that you cant steal what is yours.


The court system literally exist to make them even more wealthy (The system, judges, lawyers, everyone involved in that system). The common people lose right away due to lawyers fees. Often the sought after result wasn't worth all the $ thrown in the case. Just look how many families/people go bankrupt to win a case in court that the result was obvious to most.

Or how women will win 99% child care service because they have a slit.

This post was edited by SunnyvaleTrailerPark on May 28 2021 07:09am
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
May 28 2021 08:21am
Quote (Plaguefear @ May 28 2021 06:20am)
So you want anarchy but with ownership?


I think that's an admirable goal, yes.

Quote (Thor123422 @ May 28 2021 07:58am)
If you are in a society you are in state 3. If you arent you are in state 2. In absence of any agreement between parties the only right is the right of force. The rightful owner is not something you can conclude with pure reason. It depends on the rules of ownership and without rules there is merely force.


You're hung up on hierarchy.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 28 2021 08:32am
Quote (Santara @ May 28 2021 09:21am)
I think that's an admirable goal, yes.

You're hung up on hierarchy.


In what way? I don't see how I'm bringing up hierarchy in any way. There is no way to determine rightful owner without first defining the system. The first two states have no defined system and therefore you can't really say they have a rightful owner. There is merely force. In a society that system to find is the social contract in the system of laws that you are working under. The reason is simple, force is what defines ownership

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 28 2021 08:34am
Member
Posts: 4,802
Joined: Feb 6 2020
Gold: 347.20
May 28 2021 11:16am
Quote (duffman316 @ May 28 2021 08:43am)
Vigilante justice is not good for society. Taking justice into your own hands becauae you feel the justice system has failed might feel satisfactory but it can quickly lead down a path of violence and crime because it is not a measured response and there is no due process.


It's 100% effective. Chopping people hands when they steal, burning them with tires if they rape/do something very bad to someone or hanging them because they ruined someone life... Sure why not? It''ll make people think twice before doing something bad and you save the states $ to get rid of the trash.

This post was edited by SunnyvaleTrailerPark on May 28 2021 11:17am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1151617181920Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll