Quote (Santara @ May 28 2021 05:51am)
A person who chooses to use force to take what hey want from another does not lend the characteristic "rightful" to their possession of what they took. They have taken it, and hold the power to do with it as they please, but the state of rightfulness is not conferred. Rightful is derived from reason, just as natural rights are. If I get on a plane to China and steal something from someone there, and I have never participated in their social contract, that doesn't mean what I have done is right, or that they have no claim to put me through their courts to punish me for my behavior. If I produce something of value, and you use force to take some of it from me - even with (empty) promises to return it to me through your choices of "investment," the decision to take is yours and reason dictates that without my consent, you have stolen it.
If you are in a society you are in state 3. If you arent you are in state 2. In absence of any agreement between parties the only right is the right of force. The rightful owner is not something you can conclude with pure reason. It depends on the rules of ownership and without rules there is merely force.
Quote (duffman316 @ May 28 2021 07:43am)
Vigilante justice is not good for society. Taking justice into your own hands becauae you feel the justice system has failed might feel satisfactory but it can quickly lead down a path of violence and crime because it is not a measured response and there is no due process.
Of course society must try to get people to use the courts for the purpose of stability but that doesnt change that you cant steal what is yours.
This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 28 2021 06:59am