Quote (thesnipa @ Sep 24 2020 04:20pm)
i think you're a bit confused as to what the reaction is here, it's at least 4 pronged.
1. anger at an illegal warrant to the filing officer (not the judges fault as much, with the faulty info given to her)
2. anger at the police for lack of announcing their entry (allegedly, although there seems little doubt here)
3. anger at the police generally for allowing no-knock warrants and lack of training in raids, announcing is a BIG deal here
4. anger at prosecution for the time they're taking
this type of widespread systematic anger is why we see a protest. because from filing officer, to shooting officer, to prosecutor there are gripes.
the courier journal is somewhat manipulated. so maybe you can explain some of the questions i have.
i.e.
as far as i'm aware, Jayden is NOT suggesting the "packages are narcotics", only suggesting that some of Glover's mail is being sent to the Taylor residence to avoid detection. and that drugs "and/or" money from drug sales, may be stashed at the Taylor residence.
this US postal worker, who is referencing "other" agencies requests... only suggested there was not "packages of interest" going there. any package was of interest to the police investigation.
Quote
Jaynes also wrote that he "verified through a U.S. postal inspector that Jamarcus Glover has been receiving packages" at Taylor's apartment.
"It is not uncommon for drug traffickers to receive mail packages at different locations to avoid detection from law enforcement," Jaynes wrote. " … Mr. J. Glover may be keeping narcotics and/or proceeds from the sale of narcotics" at Taylor's apartment "for safekeeping."
But U.S. postal inspector Tony Gooden, of Louisville, told WDRB News in May that a different agency had asked in January to look into whether Taylor's home was receiving suspicious mail. The office had concluded that the apartment was not, according to Gooden.
"There's no packages of interest going there," Gooden told the news outlet.
The Courier Journal has not been able to reach Gooden for comment.
police has conversation of Glover claiming Taylor is holding money for him.
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/leaked-documents-give-more-details-in-breonna-taylor-case/Quote
Police also installed a tracking device on Glover’s red Dodge Charger and found that he visited Taylor’s home six times in January 2020. The leaked documents included pictures of Glover picking up packages at Taylor’s house.
In transcribed conversations from the morning of March 13th, hours after Taylor was killed, Glover told another woman that Taylor had $8,000 of his money.
He said:
“Bre got down like $15 grand, she had the $8 grand I gave her the other day and she picked up another $6 grand.”
He continued:
“Bre been handling all my money, she been handling my money. She been handling my (expletive) for me and cuz, it ain’t just me.”
He added:
“And later, I can walk in that house (Bre’s) and go directly to whatever it is no problem with it.”
this is what Glover stated, which would be true, unless the money buying "shoes and clothing" was illegally obtained.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/09/04/report-details-why-louisville-police-wanted-search-breanna-taylors-home/5706161002/Quote
Glover has since disputed some of that surveillance evidence.
He told The Courier Journal in an Aug. 26 interview he'd worried about deliveries to his house being stolen, and Taylor had agreed to have the items sent to her apartment instead.
"Nothing even been illegal there," he said. "Getting shoes and clothes coming through the mail is not illegal. Nothing illegal at all."
i could add to all of this, but i could be missing something. so, i'll stop here for the moment.