My favourite part is where he refuses to understand how the right to not be forced to speak a language and the right to speak in any language ones chooses are not one in the same. Well that and how’s he somehow trying to classify people who have always lived where they currently are as immigrants

his misunderstandings of the first amendment were astonishing. so many failures from so many different angles. all the while claiming everyone else needed to read again, and that he was right. and like 10 posts before he said blatantly "i dont know if it is or isn't illegal", dropping all of the snark and claims on the 1a shit.

he's card sultan 2.0, a worm who just tries to disagree, and more often than not disagrees with himself and never acknowledges it. give him time, he always comes full circle back.

first post:



latest post:

"china can do what it wants, if these people aren't immigrants it still doesnt matter, but also they are, they immigrated 1000 years ago when china moved the border over their heads."

This post was edited by thesnipa on Aug 1 2019 02:29pm

Do you somehow have the impression, that YOUR viewpoint will change mine? Do you think that by playing word games you will convince me that it is a better idea to have the signs in a given country in different languages?
I'm really curious about this.

Obviously having the signs in any given country in different languages is.... STOOOOOPID. So I'm honestly curious as to...


1. Why you feel that way.
2. Your reasons for feeling that way.


I mean I've asked this many times in this topic, and still haven't gotten an answer to that.

in my opinion all street signs, by law, SHOULD be in latin text. the 27 letter alphabet more or less.

in my opinion, the govt should never do anything about the language on any signage for any business.

In my opinion, all govt posted signage should be in the same 27 letter alphabet.

not "english", because thats a point i destroyed in 2 seconds with just the street i live on. if they want to call it "Yang Street" that's fine too, even in China town.

the reason you dont get it, is because you havent tried to since the starts. you said "good job China", which implies you want the same done here, as do all of your posts saying you want the same done here. i'm pointing out to you the illegality and the inconsistency with the constitution this presents, in america, where we live.

In america, the country we live in, governed by the guidelines of the constitution and legally bound to it, the govt cant make linguistic changes to a private business' sign, unless the content is lewd such as porn or gore. when i told you this you claimed any business with a store front on a street is "public". i showed you that's not true too. and now here you are accusing me of word games. because i showed you the first amendment, explained it, and explained basic govt/business relationships from a legal standpoint.

learn to take a lesson from people who know more about a topic than you. if i ever need a quality shoe shining balm or lessons on how to microwave meals for one i'll be sure to hit you up.

but to answer overall, i dont give a shit about your opinions, im stating inarguable facts about law, that u argue every time. because you're the one on the leash and im just out for a walk.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Aug 1 2019 02:41pm

Like I said earlier, OP getting dragged harder than a doctor on a United flight.

hey man he's just responding to tangents and word games. he just wanted a nice peaceful thread about the genocide of Muslim culture!

Again... the 1st amendment does NOT prohibit passing a law that all signs should be in the language of this country. That language has 26 letters, btw.

Secondly I have given multiple examples of why this would be a good idea. You have given NONE showing why this would not be a good idea.

A storefront IS public if the public uses it. This is why they have permits, fire inspections, etc., etc.



I guess this is all my fault... because I once again assumed you were an intelligent person, that seriously wanted to discuss this. Apparently I was wrong.



And I'm still waiting to hear WHY you think signs in any number of non-US languages should be allowed in this country.




/e




I guess misquoting me is NOT... "word games". :/


/ee Ya know... IF I was stupid enough to fall for your BS, I'd probably have to kill myself.

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 1 2019 02:49pm

The 1a prohibits the govt imposing on the language of signs for private businesses. This is basic stuff. Learn to learn.

Why do I think that? The us constitution. Simple

This post was edited by thesnipa on Aug 1 2019 03:14pm

Well, obviously you don't want to answer. So I guess we're done.

I answered. It should be allowed because the 1a allows it. It is the freedom of their speech. Signs are speech. Arguing this shows u don't understand the constitution in even a basic way.