Trump's tweet storms confirmed most of it

as usual

I'm saying it could be one of the two with my guess being fabricated. Either option adds up to the same thing - this isn't a big deal.

This isn't some 9/11 conspiracy theory. This leak doesn't really make sense IMO..... Why would someone leak this, and (presumably) cause Trump to go on some wild goose chase to find the leak and potentially oust this person? Why wouldn't they just keep doing what they've been doing?

sometimes u can make something up that's true too. if i guessed your IQ was 60 i'd have a 1 in 6 or so chance to get it right, because you're in the 57-62 range.

but you're ignoring the facts i laid out, they're all true. so everything in the article, beyond the foreign policy specifics, are all common sense. Trump has rooted out dissenters and those that werent with his agenda, it's highly logical to assume that:

1. some are still there
2. some may have yet to dissent
3. some, given changes over time, become dissenters

if you've never directly ignored something your boss specifically asked you to do its because you are a simpleton with a simple job. likely manual labor who's duties and concerns can be fit on a single piece of loose leaf.



the same reason that Stormy Daniels (maybe it was the playboy model) sold her story to National Enquirer.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Sep 7 2018 09:16am

actually the made up source conspiracy intentionally feeds into the enemy of the people narrative

which is a big deal

making up a source is a big deal and so is this enemy of the people campaign lead by a fake news driven President

////

the leak makes perfect sense for some opportunist that wants to sell a book and sit on news panels as a pundit

which is probably what this actually is which is a far cry from a made up source

This post was edited by Beowulf on Sep 7 2018 09:24am

Beowulf > most of you fucks.

It is a bombshell... I can't think of a similar historical situation. Just because the Trump wingnuts and Republican politicians stick their heads in the sand doesn't mean it's not a significant story.

1. Someone decided they could pretty much say anything to the NYT or Woodward and get either money or fame.
2. Even if every bit of it is true. So what.

Stormy did it for money, obviously, and then maybe for fame.
Omarosa did it for fame, and maybe down the road for money.

Doesn't mean either one told the truth. And even if they did... so what. None of the things Trump is accused of by the NYT, Woodward or the bimbos, is illegal.

Holy Cow. PaRD is on fire with the fellatio this morning.



Sorry folks, i'm not going to drink the Koolaid until the dust settles on this one. This "bombshell" won't be talked about in 5 days time.

Can we get back to the Hispanic/Jewish woman who threw up a NeoNazi sign during BK's hearing? Or the collusion story? Maybe Nike? At least that shit is funny.

One day back and I get suspended for calling you guys fucks.

Collusion confirmed.

I think some PaRDians WANT there to be something to all this. Not because they really think it will unseat Trump, but so they can feel like they were there for a great time in history.

Well here's some info for those PaRDians. They already were there 'for a great time in history'. It was on November 8th 2016.
Anything after that it's just liberal tears and pussy hats.




/e Here's your 'I was there for a great time in history' piece of the action.






This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 7 2018 09:56am

I'm gonna start imagining you being Gramps from House 2 just to get through your terrible posts from now on.