d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Trump-kim Summit
Prev1151617181950Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 40,247
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 5,737.99
Jun 12 2018 12:23pm
Quote (dro94 @ Jun 12 2018 01:17pm)
Is this what world peace feels like

Member
Posts: 105,124
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jun 12 2018 12:25pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 12 2018 02:17pm)
so Ghot, who has been saying that China fears the US involvement in the south China sea, and doesn't want any expansion, now believes that China is happy that the US is putting security inside of NK on the chinese border?

jesus christ man, try following a logical string of thought sometime.




1. China DOES fear US involvement in the South China Sea.
2. China IS happy with the Summit.
3. The US will never be allowed to put any "war tech" in NK. Even if Kim allows it.

Why? Because NK is China's pawn. Itr's pretty simple.
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Jun 12 2018 12:25pm
In my opinion, ending military exercises with the South Koreans would be a mistake.
Member
Posts: 92,928
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jun 12 2018 12:25pm


Shapiro's shit eating grin when that bimbo mentioned Kim firing "3 hardliners"



Quote (Ghot @ Jun 12 2018 12:25pm)
1. China DOES fear US involvement in the South China Sea.
2. China IS happy with the Summit.
3. The US will never be allowed to put any "war tech" in NK. Even if Kim allows it.

Why? Because NK is China's pawn. Itr's pretty simple.


that's what i'm saying you think, maybe now u can read it again without getting confused.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jun 12 2018 12:27pm
Member
Posts: 105,124
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jun 12 2018 12:28pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Jun 12 2018 02:25pm)
In my opinion, ending military exercises with the South Koreans would be a mistake.




The exercises mean nothing. The 28,000 troops and the anti-ballistic missile emplacements, mean a great deal.

All Trump "promised" was IF he sees progress towards de-nuking, he wouldn't do exercises.



/e

Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 12 2018 02:17pm)
so Ghot, who has been saying that China fears the US involvement in the south China sea, and doesn't want any expansion, now believes that China is happy that the US is putting security inside of NK on the chinese border?

jesus christ man, try following a logical string of thought sometime.


Quote (Ghot @ Jun 12 2018 02:25pm)
1. China DOES fear US involvement in the South China Sea.
2. China IS happy with the Summit.
3. The US will never be allowed to put any "war tech" in NK. Even if Kim allows it.

Why? Because NK is China's pawn. Itr's pretty simple.


Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 12 2018 02:25pm)
that's what i'm saying you think, maybe now u can read it again without getting confused.



I'll try again for the slow kids. BOTH the bolded statements are true. That wasn't multiple choice. :lol:

This post was edited by Ghot on Jun 12 2018 12:33pm
Member
Posts: 92,928
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jun 12 2018 12:35pm
Quote (Ghot @ Jun 12 2018 12:28pm)
I'll try again for the slow kids. BOTH the bolded statements are true. That wasn't multiple choice. :lol:


they're happy with what? nonspecifics?

now ask yourself something grandpa, if they didn't like the summit would they publicly state they're unhappy the Korean peninsula is denuclearizing? :rofl:

you truly are incapable of thinking anything that reuters hasn't chewed up and spit in your baby bird mouth first.
Member
Posts: 105,124
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jun 12 2018 12:37pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 12 2018 02:35pm)
they're happy with what? nonspecifics?

now ask yourself something grandpa, if they didn't like the summit would they publicly state they're unhappy the Korean peninsula is denuclearizing? :rofl:

you truly are incapable of thinking anything that reuters hasn't chewed up and spit in your baby bird mouth first.




Not slow enough I see.

All four statements in post #162 are true. I just started with two of them, but obviously that was too fast for you.
I suggest you type a bit less and think a bit more. Maybe you'll catch on. :D

/e I mean I even quoted the important part of the Reuters article for you.

This post was edited by Ghot on Jun 12 2018 12:38pm
Member
Posts: 92,928
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jun 12 2018 12:42pm
Quote (Ghot @ Jun 12 2018 12:37pm)
Not slow enough I see.

All four statements in post #162 are true. I just started with two of them, but obviously that was too fast for you.
I suggest you type a bit less and think a bit more. Maybe you'll catch on. :D

/e I mean I even quoted the important part of the Reuters article for you.


so china is "happy" with a summit that's nonspecific, and even if they were upset they'd say they were happy. do you agree with that? or do you think that the chinese would make it public they were unhappy with a denuclearization deal?

what you're saying is "Schrodinger's cat is dead" before the box is opened. :bonk:

i'm always left baffled at how many specifics you need explained in every single post. we've never had a specimen quite so unimpressive.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jun 12 2018 12:44pm
Member
Posts: 105,124
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jun 12 2018 12:44pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 12 2018 02:42pm)
so china is "happy" with a summit that's nonspecific, and even if they were upset they'd say they were happy. do you agree with that? or do you think that the chinese would make it public they were unhappy with a denuclearization deal?

what you're saying is "Schrodinger's cat is dead" before the box is opened. :bonk:




Here's the quote again.

Quote
China, North Korea’s most important economic and diplomatic supporter despite its anger at Pyongyang’s nuclear and missile tests, wasted little time with a reminder that U.N. sanctions could be adjusted if North Korea behaved itself.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Jun 12 2018 12:45pm
Ghot really is a thread killer.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1151617181950Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll