thats already been done

Why simply repeat work that has already been done, plus i understand focal length, perspective, horizon and vanishing point and how if you dont - you can be fooled by a "graven" image.

Good point, why repeat the thousands of years of experiments that have proved the oblate spheroid shape of Earth.

How dumb do people have to be to fall for card sultan running every third thread in PaRD off topic?

the thousands of years?

Aristotle wasn't aware of selenelion eclipses

Eratosthenes was wrong and wasn't aware sundials dont work on a sphere and had to assume sunlight was completely parallel in cities 700km apart when clearly it is not


Copernicus died a year before his Heliocentric model was published and quickly adopted by the C of E and taught to the lower classes because it was seen as a boost to the elite merchants who made their money by sailing and trade.

Newton never believed in gravity, he even said it was a silly theory.

No one ever saw Cavendish's "experiment" - it was only assumed it was correct when they read about it in his journal after he died.

Einstein prove that gravity was not a force and the result of space time.

There's actually more proof that gravity is not real, and no proof that gravity is real.

But if you have a proof for gravity - Id love to see it - i want to believe in your faith but i just cant at this time.

I dont run it off topic - people keep bringing it up and i simply indulge their desires.