penis versus penis? it would be hard to have a 0" penis but im glad you have a 5"

All things are nothing to me.



Oh, boy.



Think you've been in SQL land a bit too long there.

Conspiracy, lol, that would imply some kind of minority standing. It is openly flaunted and biological explanations are instantly dismissed for cultural conclusions, I bet there's a thread right now on the front page concluding cultural factors over nature, have a look.

It would be silly to assume that environments take place in a vacuum on their own and that humans are separated completely as blank slates completely produced from where they are, free from biological factors, which is what most cultural determinists would have you believe if follow closely to the way they frame things, the rhetoric, and context used too. You will also notice they stay away from biological conclusions unless there's no possible way they could weasel out of them, I would say Anthropology takes a huge hit from the culture dogma crowd, as for the other parts of the humanities, no hope for them.

This post was edited by j0ltk0la on Jan 22 2015 06:30pm

There's no reason to maintain a base-2 system for gender, especially when there are literally 6 (or more?) different chromosomal sexes. I'm sorry you have a phobia of the abnormal.

save your breath he is not acknowledging known scientific research on the subject of sex vs. gender and instead clings to the statistical minority of unaligned sex-gender individuals to classify them as abnormal and therefore prove that there are only 2 genders.

Phobia is a nice listen sometimes but it doesn't come close to describing my feelings for the abnormal, completely neutral towards them as evolution has natural processes for dealing with deviation.



I'm not acknowledging distinction because they simply don't matter, abnormal gender groups can be in their own category, without affecting the normal Male/Female divide, which will function as a binary regardless of insignificant abnormalities and other natural accidents.

The natural processes you are referring to are d2jsp users that don't like genders outside the normal binary?

If evolution deals with deviation as you say, then why are you concerned with doing anything about it? Or are you not, you're just stating they're abnormal? In which case, so?

scientifically incorrect. Gender is a proven spectrum, spectrums are no subject to binary categorization. And you keep stating normal male/female like you have studies to back it up, when the reality is studies have forever backed that all places on the gender spectrum are very common except the ends which are the statistical outliers you are continually describing. Studies don't support there only being masculine/male and feminine/female as statistically significant percentages, that's just the simple fact you keep grazing over.

much substantive research has been done in New-Guinea and Amazon - i left mentions about them there in my post and kind of expected you to do some thinking. are neighbouring tribes that different?


front page? i'm sorry that the academia doesn't follow your personal convictions. if you want to do research that specialises in Stormfront propaganda or propaganda .jpgs from /pol/ you're more than free to do so.


so is it biological differences that drive these differences between gender roles and whatnot? i'm really not quite following you here. what kind of an evolution has gone on in, say, Europe with such rapid changes in peoples' lifes and lifestyles in all possible fields? how rapid was evolution with the switch from hunter-gathering to agriculture?
can we expect giant grasshoppers or spooky b-class horror movie shit like that to take over if mutations like that persist?

conspiracy-theories & alleged imaginary people that argue such and such, whoop-dee-doo

This post was edited by Gastly on Jan 22 2015 07:04pm

I saw a big wall of text so I decided to ignore it given the OP. It's probably the same tired drivel...wahhhh someone's morality disagrees with mine wahhhh.