it's absolutely hilarious what hoops our shills are willing to jump through to avoid the logical conclusion from mueller's repeated insistence that he simply was not allowed to charge the president with a crime due to OLC policy, while at the same time laying out in detail how trump actually did obstruct justice, and specifically pointing out that he would have stated if the president had not committed a crime.

tmw our cultists' mental gymnastics outperform even fox' spins... maybe you should actually read volume two.
well, hundreds of former federal prosecutors did, and signed an open letter explaining how every american citizen that is not the potus would definitely have been charged with obstruction of justice.

Mueller saying "I can't clear the president" is inane. That's quite obviously not the role of the prosecutor. Not bringing charges is tantamount to there being insufficient evidence to substantiate those charges, and it is perfectly ok for Trump to consider that vindication in a vacuum.

Yeah, oj simpson was vindicated too.

no charges were brought up for oj simpson?

He was found not guilty of all charges, vindicated.

Oh you're jumping to conclusions you like using "logic" ie this thing o will interpret to be how I want.

Most people who seen this, reasonable people, know what Muller was saying and implying. Why would Barr say the report answers questions the writer of the report says it does not answer?

So much subterfuge. Way for the whole of the GOP to sell out for this one president to cucked them who is so far beneath the average American in terms of honor and ethics.





Am I the only one who watched the speech and not Fox highlights?

Mueller said there was no apparatus to charge the president and that this apparatus needed to be created for future cases like this.

Subterfuge.




OJ was able to be charged by the courts. Inability to be charged by courts due to them lacking jurisdiction isn't the same thing as being innocent.

You guys confirm the consequent and deny the antecedent and call it conclusive. You guys aren't thinking real logically. We know Trump support is more a passion thing though. Just believe strong enough and it doesn't matter what's true

This post was edited by Skinned on May 30 2019 05:11am

so while you may be vetted to be a social worker for adults there still isn’t proof that there is a report or file that exonerates you from not being exonerated from kicking puppies and slapping children for “stress relief”. you have a very stressful position so this behavior isn’t out of the realm of possibility. until you are able to provide a report that exonerates you beyond a reasonable doubt there isn’t really a choice other than to say you’re guilty until proven innocent


mueller got them all riled up again. pelosi is going to be busy trying to reel everyone in the (D) party in as they screech impeachment for the 200th time this year

This post was edited by excellence on May 30 2019 05:55am

This isn't how Trump is being treated.

Now straw man arguments. This is turning into a logical fallacy day.

If only the presidency could ever be in a vacuum