Quote (IceMage @ 9 Feb 2016 04:32)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcnZRctcleM
WLC: 999999
Atheists: 0
Craig doing what he always does. Trying to define atheism as the positive assertion that the supernatural does not exist when that's not the argument that anyone is making.
WLC: 999999
Strawman: 0
Atheist: Being thoroughly ignored by WLC in order that he can continue to beat the strawman instead of giving any real evidence for his positive assertion that the supernatural does exist.
It's funny because in that clip he says something like 'Who's claiming you should believe the supernatural does exist?' when that is his entire platform. It's HIS argument. Who's claiming it? He is.
The fact that you think that WLC has somehow proved something in this video is testament to your utter stupidity and inability to assess the validity of arguments being made. WLC always gets bogged down in trying to tell atheists that they aren't atheist but agnostic. His argument is not much different than Ken Ham's 'You weren't there so how can you know?'. It's simply 'You can't know so how can you say I'm wrong?'. It's literally retarded and only an utter moron would fall for it as anything other than a cosmic dodging of the actual debate.
The actual debate is always about the rationality of believing the positive assertion that the supernatural exists. Craig is the one making that assertion.