Quote (fender @ 14 Dec 2017 15:28)

you're trying to be funny here, right? how about a president constantly on twitter, trying to systematically delegitimise critical media. how about the most powerful man in the word watching cable tv for 8 hours a day and making decisions based on the "wisdom" of his favourite hosts - but unable to focus on briefings? would someone like that be fit for office in your opinion?

Quote (fender @ Dec 14 2017 06:28am)

you're trying to be funny here, right? how about a president constantly on twitter, trying to systematically delegitimise critical media. how about the most powerful man in the word watching cable tv for 8 hours a day and making decisions based on the "wisdom" of his favourite hosts - but unable to focus on briefings? would someone like that be fit for office in your opinion?

Quote (fender @ 14 Dec 2017 10:28)

you're trying to be funny here, right? how about a president constantly on twitter, trying to systematically delegitimise critical media. how about the most powerful man in the word watching cable tv for 8 hours a day and making decisions based on the "wisdom" of his favourite hosts - but unable to focus on briefings? would someone like that be fit for office in your opinion?

Quote (excellence @ Dec 14 2017 07:12am)

and he did all this while eating fried chicken with a fork and knife. surely the end of drumpf

Quote (ampoo @ Dec 14 2017 09:42am)

lets not forget the diet coke :rofl:

of course you are not hesitant to treat any rumour about trump as a fact

Quote (IceMage @ 14 Dec 2017 16:31)

The NYT interviewing a bunch of people who work in the White House and worked in the campaign isn't "rumour". This isn't the media picking on Trump, every president gets these kind of stories written about them.

I mean, is it that hard to believe Trump watches 4-8 hours of television a day? Go look at twitter, he's obsessed with the coverage he gets.

Quote (IceMage @ Dec 14 2017 11:31am)

The NYT interviewing a bunch of people who work in the White House and worked in the campaign isn't "rumour". This isn't the media picking on Trump, every president gets these kind of stories written about them.

I mean, is it that hard to believe Trump watches 4-8 hours of television a day? Go look at twitter, he's obsessed with the coverage he gets.

Quote (EndlessSky @ Dec 14 2017 09:39am)

Mueller is hiding a political agenda of sedition. NYT is covering bullshit to create a smokescreen and push Liberal Democrat propaganda.

The proportion of time spent pn both stories is beyond stupid.

Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 14 2017 11:45am)

i like that your side has devolved to buzzwords. a vague wide net of leftist policies (that they cant make happen as they dont have the congress or wh) is all you guys have as a boogeyman these days.

Media pushing policies today that cant even conceivably be looked at for another 3-7 years?

Even if it is vaguely true, that's opposition politics. The only reason you have support for Obamacare repeals and many other of your preferred policies is because of that same opposition politics the right grand standed on while out of power for 8 years. No one would be in support of a wall that no one knows how we'll pay for, repealing Obamacare without a replacement, or many other policies without it.

It's one thing to dislike something, its another to be a hypocrite. worse yet i doubt it even registers with you, because you're "different and better" right? :rolleyes:

WHAAAAH its costing us money.... just like the HRC panels u loved watching.

WAAAAAH its taking up time in the legislative agenda, just like all the shit GOP pulled for years with wasting time on Obamacare repeals with no replacement or tax restructuring Obama wouldnt ever sign.

Waaaah CNN is misleading people to believe a false narrative, fox news and brietbart.


its all even, put on your big boy pants and figure a way to get the "worlds best negotiator" to figure it out.

Quote (EndlessSky @ Dec 14 2017 09:46am)

“I hate inconvenient facts reeee”