d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
Prev1156157158159160424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Banned
Posts: 20,182
Joined: Mar 1 2011
Gold: 0.05
Warn: 70%
Nov 9 2021 03:53pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Nov 9 2021 01:44pm)
hooooly fuck

Is this going to be the first nationally televised media circus trial where the lead prosecutor commits suicide?


LMAO

I hear he only gets paid like 60k a year as well lmao
Member
Posts: 50,923
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Nov 9 2021 03:54pm
I was somewhat willing before to assume that the previous witness who perjured himself about the distance between Rosen and Ritten was just harboring his own personal bias or bad analysis and the fact he was related by blood to half the democratic officials of Kenosha, his family tree being the mayor and judge and other attorneys- was just coincidence, or at worst just indicative of an upbringing that could lead to his political bias. But after this last exchange, its pretty good odds the prosecutors suborned perjury from their buddy.
Member
Posts: 50,923
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Nov 9 2021 03:58pm
Member
Posts: 15,801
Joined: Jul 9 2021
Gold: 291.00
Nov 9 2021 04:00pm


:rofl:
Member
Posts: 29,008
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Nov 9 2021 04:26pm
I just tuned in for a recap, it was an intermission and the judge was reading a cookie cook book.

Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Nov 9 2021 04:38pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Nov 9 2021 04:58pm)
https://files.catbox.moe/whjd5e.mp4


I love the reactions of the lawyers on the left. I seen one where the dude said he was pointing his gun at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse fired on him and the faces were like WOAH and even the stenographer had a reaction.
Member
Posts: 29,008
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Nov 9 2021 04:51pm
I would think as a prosecutor you wouldn't take offence to what a witness said and go after someone like that on the stand. That did not seem like an advantageous thing to do.
Member
Posts: 36,937
Joined: Oct 20 2007
Gold: 48,650.00
Nov 9 2021 04:56pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Nov 9 2021 04:58pm)
https://files.catbox.moe/whjd5e.mp4


what was this in reference to?
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Nov 9 2021 05:00pm
Quote (SBD @ 9 Nov 2021 14:51)
I would think as a prosecutor you wouldn't take offence to what a witness said and go after someone like that on the stand. That did not seem like an advantageous thing to do.


Terrible preparation. These prosecutors haven't had a single witness answer questions in a way they expected them to.

My hope is that this is all wrapped up by Friday, tbh.

Quote (Goomshill @ 9 Nov 2021 15:05)
I think any impartial jury who watched this testimony would have no choice but to be willing to convict the prosecutors, and not particularly care on what grounds


LOL. Agreed.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Nov 9 2021 05:06pm
Member
Posts: 50,923
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Nov 9 2021 05:05pm
I think any impartial jury who watched this testimony would have no choice but to be willing to convict the prosecutors, and not particularly care on what grounds
No really who thought it was a good idea to try to browbeat the autismo witness and accuse him of profiteering, only to find out he's rain man not simple jack

This post was edited by Goomshill on Nov 9 2021 05:06pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1156157158159160424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll