https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2017/10/30/china-starts-the-biggest-shutdown-of-steel-factories-in-history/
The operating restrictions affect one quarter of China’s total steel-making capacity and approximately 10% of cement production.
Actually their governement is strong enough to do it, and they will probably do it because they just want to demote USA.
- how about the co2 that has already been emitted (in the 70's etc) ?
- and who is deliberately going for coal...

btw;
https://www.ecowatch.com/china-solar-target-2476947208.html

More fact checking https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/06/01/fact-checking-president-trumps-claims-on-the-paris-climate-change-deal/



the only "joke" here is you and your toxicity

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Nov 7 2017 11:12pm

is the paris agreement perfect? certainly not, but apparently you don't have the slightest idea how difficult it is to get all nations to agree to at least take action in that matter.

and what you're completely ignoring, while trying to discredit the agreement in order to make excuses for your cult leader, is that he isn't the slightest bit interested in "more effective ways" of protecting the climate. he thinks man made climate change is a chinese hoax and wants to refocus on fossil fuels (for his business partners)...

greenpeace and ecowatch, surely a totally neutral and nonpartisan source on this matter.




oh, I very well do realize how difficult it is to get all nations to work together on such an issue. but thats the point: obama and the european leaders wanted to achieve an international climate agreement at all costs. they wanted to look like they were taking action. therefore, they crafted this travesty of a compromise, this eyewash in which they bought the participation of the third world countries and of the emerging giants china and india.

the sad truth is that there is global agreement on climate change being an issue, but no global agreement on concrete actions and sacrifices that should be taken for climate protection. to not lose their face, obama, merkel et al put in place the paris climate agreement and thereby set a bad example which steers global efforts for climate protection in an ineffective direction.

trump not being interested in effective climate protection either is obvious. nonetheless, by withdrawing from the paris agreement, he has done the right thing for the wrong reasons.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 8 2017 01:37am

these climate agreements are purely ideology driven and have nothing to do with reality

the german ministry of the environment had to admit recently that we are not even close to our goals for the year 2020 (reducing emissions by 40% in 2020 compared to 1990 for those who dont know)
interesting fact: that a large portion of the reduction of CO2 emissions compared to 1990 comes from the massive deindustrialization of the former eastern german state after the unification of germany
i can try to find the article if you are interested ^^

not to mention that we are spending hundreds of billions for ineffective energy, merkels retarded decision against nuclear power, electromobility bullshit, etc etc, its too much to list it all here

This post was edited by ampoo on Nov 8 2017 07:59am

Why would the US enter into an agreement that is clearly of no benefit to the country. It has nothing to do with cultist leaders and your obsession with Trump, but simply a bad agreement. It doesn't matter if other countries were in agreement... why wouldn't they be? The US was compensating for the majority of this agreement with little to no return. US doesn't need to bear the burden for other countries.

Another boring post from Fender...

E:

oh, I very well do realize how difficult it is to get all nations to work together on such an issue. but thats the point: obama and the european leaders wanted to achieve an international climate agreement at all costs. they wanted to look like they were taking action. therefore, they crafted this travesty of a compromise, this eyewash in which they bought the participation of the third world countries and of the emerging giants china and india

This is a very good point. This agreement is like the participation trophy. Everyone gets one for entering into this thing, but nothing is really accomplished.

This post was edited by djman72 on Nov 8 2017 08:21am

you just described every liberal policy ever.

Give me a quick rundown on the benefits of the chainsaw bayonet

chainsaw bayonet sounds like something that would be in a zombie video game.... I'm pretty sure a regular bayonet would have sufficed

doing sick jokes while so many innocent people get assassinated, fit you very well.


----------

edit; Oups it's the picture topic ! my bad.


Top news video "mossad agent chased from downing street"

UK minister Priti Patel was secretely collaborating with right israel governement



---------







This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Nov 8 2017 04:34pm