d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > October Invasion Of Israel
Prev1156215631564156515661635Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 56,243
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Nov 6 2025 02:58pm
Israel stopped expanding in 1967, it actually lost more land than gained since 1967


right. i guess if we forget about the west bank and the golan heights these alternative facts would have some weight.
Member
Posts: 56,243
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Nov 6 2025 03:00pm
Yes it is. It's not an approach to national defense that you support, I think that is clear, but denying that displacing the people who keep attacking you is national defense is pretty dumb.

I like the new name, it's what it is and it's nice to tell the truth. America will defend itself by destroying you if you fuck around.


oh wow, who is invading the US? oh i wonder what happened to the indians. how dare they attack those pesky europeans, better kill them all. they fucked around as you so aptly put it, and they found out. you must be very proud.

This post was edited by ferdia on Nov 6 2025 03:00pm
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Nov 6 2025 03:04pm
oh wow, who is invading the US? oh i wonder what happened to the indians. how dare they attack those pesky europeans.


Yeah, well as you pointed out most of that was done by Europeans literally before the American national identity existed. But it continued, and was a war for a long time that to be fair the plains tribes were winning by brutal tactics for hundreds of years.
Member
Posts: 17,971
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 6 2025 03:05pm
right. i guess if we forget about the west bank and the golan heights these alternative facts would have some weight.


Israel has already proven it does not seek to keep conquered land: it captured the Sinai Peninsula in 1967 and returned it to Egypt under the 1979 peace treaty, fully completed in 1982, even though Sinai is larger than Israel itself. As for the West Bank (Judea and Samaria), it was taken in 1967 from Jordan and has remained under Israeli control since then. Israelis settling there are not “stealing” new territory: they are living in areas that have been under Israeli administration for decades and that hold deep historical and biblical significance for the Jewish people.
Member
Posts: 56,243
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Nov 6 2025 03:10pm
Israel has already proven it does not seek to keep conquered land: it captured the Sinai Peninsula in 1967 and returned it to Egypt under the 1979 peace treaty, fully completed in 1982, even though Sinai is larger than Israel itself. As for the West Bank (Judea and Samaria), it was taken in 1967 from Jordan and has remained under Israeli control since then. Israelis settling there are not “stealing” new territory: they are living in areas that have been under Israeli administration for decades and that hold deep historical and biblical significance for the Jewish people.


There is NO WAY that Israel will return lands from the west bank. by all evidence, factors and metric's, israel continues to claim more and more land in the west bank.

1. Since Oct 7th at least 114 new Israeli settlement outposts have been established in the West Bank.
2. Over 38,000 “violations” (in terms of army and settler activity against Palestinian property/persons) have been documented in the West Bank since 7 Oct 2023.
3. The Israeli planning authorities submitted 355 master plans covering 37,415 settlement units on 38,551 dunams of land; of these, 18,801 units have already been approved.
4. In early 2025, the Israeli government approved the creation of 22 new settlements, including legalising existing outposts that had not been formally authorised.
5. By June 2025, a report states that approximately 18,959 new settlement housing units had been approved in the West Bank in 2025 so far.
6. On 5 November 2025, tenders were issued for the construction of 356 new settler units in the West Bank.
7. Alongside housing, Israel has also expanded infrastructure: creation of buffer zones, new roads and gates/ barriers isolating Palestinian communities; one report says over 1,200 military-barrier installations have been created since the war.
8. Legal/administrative changes: the approval process for settlement construction has been streamlined (weekly meetings of planning council vs quarterly), and ministerial oversight has been reduced — this is viewed as structural change to accelerate expansion.

you are literally carving the west bank up and gobbling up the small pieces.

Yeah, well as you pointed out most of that was done by Europeans literally before the American national identity existed. But it continued, and was a war for a long time that to be fair the plains tribes were winning by brutal tactics for hundreds of years.


you might want to go read a history book.

This post was edited by ferdia on Nov 6 2025 03:15pm
Member
Posts: 17,971
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 6 2025 03:14pm
There is NO WAY that Israel will return lands from the west bank. by all evidence, factors and metric's, israel continues to claim more and more land in the west bank.

1. Since Oct 7th at least 114 new Israeli settlement outposts have been established in the West Bank.
2. Over 38,000 “violations” (in terms of army and settler activity against Palestinian property/persons) have been documented in the West Bank since 7 Oct 2023.
3. The Israeli planning authorities submitted 355 master plans covering 37,415 settlement units on 38,551 dunams of land; of these, 18,801 units have already been approved.
4. In early 2025, the Israeli government approved the creation of 22 new settlements, including legalising existing outposts that had not been formally authorised.
5. By June 2025, a report states that approximately 18,959 new settlement housing units had been approved in the West Bank in 2025 so far.
6. On 5 November 2025, tenders were issued for the construction of 356 new settler units in the West Bank.
7. Alongside housing, Israel has also expanded infrastructure: creation of buffer zones, new roads and gates/ barriers isolating Palestinian communities; one report says over 1,200 military-barrier installations have been created since the war.
8. Legal/administrative changes: the approval process for settlement construction has been streamlined (weekly meetings of planning council vs quarterly), and ministerial oversight has been reduced — this is viewed as structural change to accelerate expansion.

you are literally carving the west bank up and gobbling up the small pieces.


Israel already showed it can give up land for peace. It captured the Sinai Peninsula in 1967, held it for years, and then gave it back entirely to Egypt. Sinai alone is bigger than all of Israel, so the claim that Israel only expands doesn’t hold up.
The West Bank, or Judea and Samaria, was taken in 1967 from Jordan during a defensive war. Israel didn’t take it from a Palestinian state because there wasn’t one. Since then, the area has stayed under Israeli control, and most new construction happens inside existing communities or regularizes small outposts that have been there for years.
The new roads, gates, and barriers people mention are mainly about security. After thousands of attacks since October 7, protecting civilians is not “land grabbing.”
Israel hasn’t taken new territory since 1967. What happens now is management of land it already controls, while the political future of that land is still open for negotiation.
Member
Posts: 56,243
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Nov 6 2025 03:16pm
Israel already showed it can give up land for peace. It captured the Sinai Peninsula in 1967, held it for years, and then gave it back entirely to Egypt. Sinai alone is bigger than all of Israel, so the claim that Israel only expands doesn’t hold up.
The West Bank, or Judea and Samaria, was taken in 1967 from Jordan during a defensive war. Israel didn’t take it from a Palestinian state because there wasn’t one. Since then, the area has stayed under Israeli control, and most new construction happens inside existing communities or regularizes small outposts that have been there for years.
The new roads, gates, and barriers people mention are mainly about security. After thousands of attacks since October 7, protecting civilians is not “land grabbing.”
Israel hasn’t taken new territory since 1967. What happens now is management of land it already controls, while the political future of that land is still open for negotiation.


sigh.

do you honestly expect to withdraw from the west bank. a. yes or b. no? 1 letter answer.

Actually:

a. yes
b. no
c. We already own the west bank so everything we do there is not claiming new land.

This post was edited by ferdia on Nov 6 2025 03:18pm
Member
Posts: 17,971
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 6 2025 03:19pm
sigh.

do you honestly expect to withdraw from the west bank. yes or no? 1 word answer.


No
After what happened with Gaza, Israel will not withdraw from the West Bank. Leaving areas without security control led to rockets, tunnels, and constant attacks, nobody will risk that again so close to Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.
In the future, if a real peace agreement ever becomes possible, territorial compromises could happen in other forms, maybe through land swaps or different landmass in southern Israel. But that would only come with full security guarantees and a real partner for peace, not under pressure or threats.
Member
Posts: 92,890
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 6 2025 03:27pm
Not exactly. The Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock are both inside Jerusalem, which Muslims call Al-Quds, meaning “The Holy.” That name comes from an earlier term, Bayt al-Maqdis Arabic for “The Holy House” which itself was a translation of the Hebrew Beit HaMikdash, the Jewish Temple.
So originally, Muslims referred to the city using the same root concept of holiness inherited from Judaism and Christianity. Over time, Bayt al-Maqdis was shortened to Al-Quds, and after the Umayyad caliphs built the Dome of the Rock and the southern mosque (today’s Al-Aqsa), the name became synonymous with Jerusalem as a holy city in Islam.
Still, the Quran never mentions Jerusalemor Al-Quds by name. The verse about al-Masjid al-Aqsa (“the farthest mosque”) doesn’t specify a location. Only decades later did the Umayyad rulers identify it with Jerusalem, to elevate the city’s status and tie it to the Prophet’s Night Journey.
So historically, Jerusalem - Al-Quds - became holy in Islam later on, through politics and religious tradition, not through direct Quranic mention. And just to clarify, the mosque isn’t built on the Western Wall; the Wall is a retaining wall of the ancient Jewish Temple Mount, supporting the raised platform where Al-Aqsa and the Dome of the Rock stand.


thanks for the refresher, ive read all of this but im no expert. still, in this context i think it doesnt matter. islamic people hold the city and those sites, as well as that weird one for the horse, as holy. israel can try telling them that they cant prove its the real site of the night journey, but it doesnt matter. as long as israel continues to settle in a city they consider holy peace wont be a realistic option. just as you said resettlement of gazans isnt realistic. pragmatism matters.

Lol I didn't make that claim though, did I?

I said America destroyed Japan's ability to carry out attacks for decades, which is true. Then they created a lasting ally by creating what is known in Japan as "the post-war economic miracle".

The purpose of dropping the bombs wasn't to create lasting peace, it was to force submission so that policy could be forced on them, which created lasting peace.


historians cant even agree that japan surrendered because of the bombs. its more likely, in my and many expert's opinions, a show of force to the rest of the world. even though it actually just made everyone else want nukes. japan was beaten, encircled, and most likely ready to surrender. we could have even blockaded them into surrender most likely without an invasion.
Member
Posts: 50,668
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,866.00
Nov 6 2025 03:29pm
I'm giving Trump credit for negotiating a 9th ceasefire in yet another war the media hasn't acknowledged:
https://x.com/Kurrco/status/1986500448035934561
Does Trump have anything to do with this? Fuck if I know, but I'm giving him credit anyway

This post was edited by Goomshill on Nov 6 2025 03:29pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1156215631564156515661635Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll