d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Coronavirus Thread
Prev1154155156157158910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Mar 22 2020 07:37am
Quote (dro94 @ Mar 22 2020 08:31am)
I read the original post on medium and there were some real flaws to the piece. Off the top of my head:

First of all, they are judging the virus on the past and present effects it has caused, and not the potential devastating impact it will have if it continues to spread.

The second point is that the virus isn't accelerating in spread currently due to extreme measures taken by countries, including full lockdowns, resulting in a massive loss to the economy.

The third is that even after these lockdown measures are relaxed, the science says it's highly likely there will be second third and fourth waves of infection as community spread increases.

How will COVID-19 burn off in the summer if hot countries like Mayalsia and Australia are experienced a high volume of new cases and community transmission? The spread of the virus doesn't appear to be as contagious in hotter climates but I'm concerned by the fact it's still doing so fast. Does that mean we'll get another severe outbreak come December?


But the article points to South Korea as an example that the virus can be fought without resulting to draconian measures. Yes, we expect it to continue, but the dangers of children going to school certainly appear to be overstated.

Again South Korea. Aggressive testing and contact tracing.

Yes, I agree, but if we can cope with better tactics until a vaccine is hopefully approved, given how long this is likely to last, we need a better way forward.
Member
Posts: 33,771
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Mar 22 2020 07:45am
Quote (Santara @ Mar 22 2020 01:37pm)
But the article points to South Korea as an example that the virus can be fought without resulting to draconian measures. Yes, we expect it to continue, but the dangers of children going to school certainly appear to be overstated.

Again South Korea. Aggressive testing and contact tracing.

Yes, I agree, but if we can cope with better tactics until a vaccine is hopefully approved, given how long this is likely to last, we need a better way forward.


It's easier to contact trace when most contacts are traced back to a cult in a concentrated area, what about when you've got 50k cases in a country like the US? I agree with the testing and contact tracing, I just think it's not going to have effects as dramatic in bigger countries with a high volume of cases.

Worth noting that SK didn't impose draconian measures but people imposed strict measures on themselves because in Asia they feel more of a responsibility to each other's health. SK was a ghost town for over a month and we don't know the economic impact yet.

Hope you're right though, I am just quite skeptical and think we've got more levels to go.
Member
Posts: 54,190
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 22 2020 08:38am
Quote (fender @ 22 Mar 2020 07:29)
well, the increasing number of officially confirmed cases clearly suggests the US ramped up testing. apparently there is a severe shortage of reliable tests in virtually every state, but yeah, technically there ARE tests.
and to be fair, even though many nations seem to have severely underestimated the threat (at least partly by valuing the economy over human life), and south korea deserves all the praise they get for handling this issue, we should not forget that they did have a certain infrastructural advantage and preparedness when it comes to virus testing, due to their previous experience with MERS, and generally outstanding healthcare system.


Another factor to keep in mind is that South Korea has no (passable) land borders, just like Japan, Taiwan; and Singapore only had to cut off 2 bridges to become an island too. Cutting off international travelers unless they pass strict tests is a lot easier when they can only enter the country on a handful of sea- or airports.
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Mar 22 2020 08:43am
WHO is no longer in favour of lockdown:

https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/0322/1124657-who-coronavirus/

Quote
Countries can not simply lockdown their societies to defeat coronavirus, the World Health Organization's top emergency expert said, adding that public health measures are needed to avoid a resurgence of the virus later on.

Dr Mike Ryan said: "What we really need to focus on is finding those who are sick, those who have the virus, and isolate them, find their contacts and isolate them," in an interview on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show.

"The danger right now with the lockdowns ... if we don't put in place the strong public health measures now, when those movement restrictions and lockdowns are lifted, the danger is the disease will jump back up."

Much of Europe and the United States have followed China and other Asian countries and introduced drastic restrictions to fight the new coronavirus, with most workers told to work from home and schools, bars, pubs and restaurants being closed.

Mr Ryan said that the examples of China, Singapore and South Korea, which coupled restrictions with rigorous measures to test every possible suspect, provided a model for Europe, which the WHO has said has replaced Asia as the epicentre of the pandemic.

"Once we've suppressed the transmission, we have to go after the virus. We have to take the fight to the virus," Mr Ryan said.

Italy is now the worst hit country in the world by the virus, and UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has warned that Britain's health system could be overwhelmed unless people avoid social interactions.

Mr Ryan also said that several vaccines were in development, but only one had begun trials in the United States.

Asked how long it would take before there was a vaccine available in Britain, he said that people needed to be realistic.

"We have to make sure that it's absolutely safe... we are talking at least a year," he said. "The vaccines will come, but we need to get out and do what we need to do now."
Member
Posts: 54,190
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 22 2020 08:48am
Quote (balrog66 @ 22 Mar 2020 15:43)
WHO is no longer in favour of lockdown:

https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/0322/1124657-who-coronavirus/


Uh, actually, this article does NOT say that the WHO is against lockdowns. What the WHO is saying is that lockdowns alone will not be sufficient, and that the affected countries should prepare their measures for the day when lockdowns will inevitably have to be lifted.
Member
Posts: 41,270
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Gold: 1,788.71
Mar 22 2020 08:54am
Quote (inkanddagger @ Mar 22 2020 01:06am)
Do we even have tests? I don’t know a single person who has been able to find one.



We have tests.

We just have a very strict profile on the person who can receive one. XR/CT findings (sometimes these findings occur later) , absence of any other respiratory infection (often times there are co-infections), persistent fevers (not 100% of population gets), lymphopenia (60-85% have this which means ur still missing a good chunk)

And to beat a dead horse , the test sucks

Edit: we have tests now, 2 weeks late

This post was edited by Bazi on Mar 22 2020 08:56am
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Mar 22 2020 09:57am
Quote (balrog66 @ 22 Mar 2020 15:43)
WHO is no longer in favour of lockdown:

https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/0322/1124657-who-coronavirus/


:huh: really ? Why do you hate eldery that much ?

Quote (Black XistenZ @ 22 Mar 2020 15:48)
Uh, actually, this article does NOT say that the WHO is against lockdowns. What the WHO is saying is that lockdowns alone will not be sufficient, and that the affected countries should prepare their measures for the day when lockdowns will inevitably have to be lifted.


WHO is pushing for more testing & tracing, they are probably right because what is happening is alot of people getting very few symptoms are ... not registering anywhere...
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Mar 22 2020 10:03am
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 22 2020 08:13am)
I read that article, then I read the pieces by twitter critics claiming to 'debunk' that article, like this;
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1241522140559503360.html

I found the fact and evidence and logic-based reasoning in the article a whole fucking lot more compelling than the snide commentary, quibbles over form and straw man arguments in that criticism. Not to mention overt political grievance.
I can't say that the zerohedge take is necessarily right, but I judge it by the enemies it has made.


The article was compelling on some points, but the thread you posted, as well as the one below, point out some real flaws. I'm not aware of anyone who has tried to go through the whole thing to debunk, and perhaps the guy is right on some issues like school closings, but it seems to be parroted by people who are engaging in wishful thinking.

https://twitter.com/MaxKennerly/status/1241557612409360385

This post was edited by IceMage on Mar 22 2020 10:05am
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Mar 22 2020 11:05am
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 22 2020 12:33am)
Do you think coronavirus will be a campaign issue? because if it is, we'll be bombarded with messaging reminding us what was said in the initial days/weeks/months.
Even if everyone would have forgotten otherwise, those tweets will get dredged up


It probably will be an issue but I don't think anyone's minds will be changed. Trump has his 40% and so does Biden. The remaining 20% are either extremely ignorant, lean one way and are unlikely to change their minds, etc.-

I think the biggest threat to the Trump presidency will be the virus subsiding in the summer for a bit and then coming back with a vengeance in the autumn. Ideally, the administration will have months to prepare for it but who knows?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 22 2020 11:07am
Quote (thundercock @ Mar 22 2020 12:05pm)
It probably will be an issue but I don't think anyone's minds will be changed. Trump has his 40% and so does Biden. The remaining 20% are either extremely ignorant, lean one way and are unlikely to change their minds, etc.-

I think the biggest threat to the Trump presidency will be the virus subsiding in the summer for a bit and then coming back with a vengeance in the autumn. Ideally, the administration will have months to prepare for it but who knows?


In some ways the fact that Trump really has no ideological principles and the Republican party are spineless cowards in the face of their own party can be a good thing. Trump could propose some very popular but left-leaning policies in the wake of this national emergency and might actually make progress. Some things like UBI and getting a real foundation for a national healthcare system layed.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1154155156157158910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll