d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1153115321533153415355001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Oct 23 2017 04:19pm
Quote (majorblood @ Oct 23 2017 02:59pm)
how would you define it?


Inability to regularly obtain the basic necessities for life, those basic necessities being food, water, and shelter.
/e
Kind of a wimpy definition, I know, but since it's Scaly's argument he might have a better definition.

This post was edited by BardOfXiix on Oct 23 2017 04:20pm
Member
Posts: 33,929
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 23 2017 04:19pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 23 2017 06:16pm)
You're probably mixing me up with somebody else.

But I actually don't know anybody here who has expressed they want to enforce equality of outcome.

I mean, it'd be nice if we could have equality of outcome and everybody was a millionaire, but that'd be ridiculous.



Youre right

I confused you with someone else who was a Comrade Bernie Sanders zombie

:rofl:
Member
Posts: 54,829
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,838.83
Oct 23 2017 04:22pm
Quote (BardOfXiix @ Oct 23 2017 02:19pm)
Inability to regularly obtain the basic necessities for life, those basic necessities being food, water, and shelter.
/e
Kind of a wimpy definition, I know, but since it's Scaly's argument he might have a better definition.


It's in line with the first part in that quotation I gave. The 1995 UN definition is similar to yours.
Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Oct 23 2017 04:25pm
Quote (majorblood @ Oct 23 2017 03:22pm)
It's in line with the first part in that quotation I gave. The 1995 UN definition is similar to yours.


Right. As you included the more recent definition, which has replaced the older one, I felt the need to state a criticism I had with the more modern definition used by the UN. I think the 1995 definition is not a bad one.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 23 2017 04:45pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Oct 23 2017 04:19pm)
Youre right

I confused you with someone else who was a Comrade Bernie Sanders zombie

:rofl:


I confused you with somebody who is honest.
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Oct 23 2017 04:45pm
Quote (majorblood @ 23 Oct 2017 21:30)


So deprivation of food and shelter would fit that definition. Glad we agree.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 23 2017 04:54pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 23 Oct 2017 17:12)
Extreme poverty was eliminated thanks to capitalism in the 20th century

Dems have to hyperbole to make any of their arguments relevant


speaking of capitalism eliminating things and some other political/economic practice



Quote (BardOfXiix @ 23 Oct 2017 17:34)
In Mexico 1 USD a day will get you much further than it will in England.

>in the Tierra Del Fuego 1 USD will go further than it does in the Champs Elysees

Quote (majorblood @ 23 Oct 2017 18:15)


Lol

This post was edited by excellence on Oct 23 2017 05:00pm
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Oct 23 2017 05:01pm
Quote (BardOfXiix @ 23 Oct 2017 22:19)
Inability to regularly obtain the basic necessities for life, those basic necessities being food, water, and shelter.
/e
Kind of a wimpy definition, I know, but since it's Scaly's argument he might have a better definition.


Nope. That's pretty much where I was going with extreme poverty. Don't see how it's a wimpy definition. I wasn't going with any definition of extreme poverty just saying that the poverty experienced by some disabled and dying people in the developed world is extreme in my eyes. I mean it sucks if you can't afford cable but that ain't extreme. But when a guy with a debilitating mental illness is homeless and penniless with no help from the state then that is unacceptable to me in the west where we can afford to house and feed and offer free support and healthcare to such people.
Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Oct 23 2017 05:07pm
Quote (Scaly @ Oct 23 2017 04:01pm)
Nope. That's pretty much where I was going with extreme poverty. Don't see how it's a wimpy definition. I wasn't going with any definition of extreme poverty just saying that the poverty experienced by some disabled and dying people in the developed world is extreme in my eyes. I mean it sucks if you can't afford cable but that ain't extreme. But when a guy with a debilitating mental illness is homeless and penniless with no help from the state then that is unacceptable to me in the west where we can afford to house and feed and offer free support and healthcare to such people.


Wimpy definition because I put 5 seconds of thought into it and defined it in broad strokes. There are no concrete figures or metrics by which to determine whether a person is or is not experiencing extreme poverty, by that definition. What does "regularly" mean? What metric of shelter is a "basic necessity"? These are the things that make it a wimpy definition.

Less than $1USD a day is a strong definition. It is a shitty definition, but a strong one. Clear terms, distinct, with an obvious cutoff. No questions.
Member
Posts: 33,929
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 23 2017 05:07pm
Quote (Scaly @ Oct 23 2017 07:01pm)
Nope. That's pretty much where I was going with extreme poverty. Don't see how it's a wimpy definition. I wasn't going with any definition of extreme poverty just saying that the poverty experienced by some disabled and dying people in the developed world is extreme in my eyes. I mean it sucks if you can't afford cable but that ain't extreme. But when a guy with a debilitating mental illness is homeless and penniless with no help from the state then that is unacceptable to me in the west where we can afford to house and feed and offer free support and healthcare to such people.



Stop being a pussy and take him into your home then. Dont you have a sofa?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1153115321533153415355001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll