Quote (thesnipa @ Sep 24 2018 03:52pm)
you admitted that could be possible when called out, but your gut instinct was to claim Kav is victim shaming, when it hasn't been proven who the victim is. you said it's over the line for him to essentially defend himself and claim to be a bullied victim, then said it's fine for him to proclaim his innocence, because he might be innocent. you're conscious back peddling doesn't line up with your subconscious imo. that and you seem to be denying reality, of course this increased scrutiny makes people think twice about accepting a SCOTUS appointment. "the power" (and far less money) just might not be enough, but at the very least it now factors in.
I disagree (with bold). for the most part that's nonsense IMO. and I don't think I'm backpedaling, I'm being fairly consistent; I think kavanaugh is probably guilty, not a definite by any means and that'll be largely impossible to prove. I still haven't seen a good explanation or motive for Dr. Ford to be fabricating this, and no, her political affiliation is not a motive to lie under oath.
Is it thursday yet?