There was no goalpost moving friend, someone asked a question and you never replied with evidence.

No fantasies here either, it’s self-evident to anyone glancing at your post history that you have anger issues and lash out at anyone who dares disagreeing with you. Somewhat ironic that you’d hold such strong opinions against perceived hate speech

This post was edited by Chainsaw47 on Nov 22 2022 10:45am

that's the way YOU choose to frame it, because you're biased af. meanwhile in reality, i merely refused to jump through a completely arbitrary hoop that some GQP nutter held up, in order to deny something that every reasonably intelligent person can easily identify as an obvious truth.

you chose to support their silly deflection attempt by accepting their moronic "reasoning", while also hilariously pretending not to have a dog in the fight.

as a reply, i provided you with ACTUAL evidence for my original claim (or rather the AOC tweet i posted), and you can decide for yourself if an expert analysis of social media impact concerning certain narratives is more telling, or me personally going through boebert's thousands of tweets to find the specific ones in which she promoted these conspiracies, go through the effort of neatly presenting them to you and the other dishonest actors, only to then predictably have the goal post moved AGAIN, by stubbornly and stupidly pretending they don't actually say what they are obviously implying, and so on...

i mean, it really speaks for itself that you, despite claiming NOT to agree with her stance against the LGBT+ community and her promotion of the "groomer" narrative, insist on me being "wrong" somehow for not subscribing to the moronic "logic" that only a directly hateful tweet could be counted as reliable evidence. you're trying to have your cake and eat it, buddy. you can't say you disagree with her on the same thing i disagree with her on, and at the same time pretend there simply is no way to say what her stance is without posting a tweet here on jsp, lol.

He's actually posting a study done by a group stating his claim.
Are you looking for an actual tweet where the inbred says "i hate trans people' obviously doesn't exist.

Come back with the proof asked that you claim exists, not a wall of text repeating your previous posts.



Thanks.


This post was edited by Chainsaw47 on Nov 22 2022 11:21am

"but if we pass a law to stop this then the govt will make it so us law abiding citizens cant get guns, slippery slope"

puh leeze. this scumbag got kept out of trouble by his politician grandpa and 5 people paid with their lives.

That’s the weirdest thing in this case, like how the fuck someone making death/bomb threats gets released right away. The grandpa posting "thoughts and prayers" is the icing on the cake.

no. the "proof asked" is a transparent attempt to deny a truth that you already ADMITTED you recognising, and even pretend to reject - i refuse to even entertain the moronic "argument" that only a directly hateful tweet quoted on jsp is legitimate evidence. i provided ACTUAL evidence, statistical one. just stop being such an dishonest actor, stop enabling the hate mongers if you don't want to be counted as one of them. do better.

im sure the Assemblyman would have us believe that it's a complete coincidence that the grandson he "hasnt spoken to in 10 years" walked without any charges after an attempted murder followed by an armed standoff with police.

and let's say it is, SOMEONE grandpa or otherwise, got that kid off big time. this isn't a dust up at school or a bit of robbery. this was a potential federal class A felony he walked away from with no record or even a charge that he beat. who then legally bought a firearm to murder people.

The proof asked is just that. If you can’t provide it don’t pretend it exists and instead summarize your thoughts. "She didn’t actively promote hate, but some of her fan base are incapable of differentiating between partisan ramblings on Twitter and calls for violence and hate". See? That’s easy.

Next time, you might want to cut on the hate yourself and discuss with people normally instead of trying to antagonize everyone. You get more bees with honey.

more dishonest framing in favour of the hate mongers. you can promote hate without saying anything outright offensive, hateful, or directly inciting violence. it's almost like you're completely new to the concept of language, subtext, and context. what you want to downplay as merely "partisan ramblings" IS a coordinated effort to marginalise and discriminate against a specific community. only genuine idiots wouldn't see right trough the thin veneer of "deniability by barely avoiding posting anything too direct", lol. again, the dog whistles are deafening.

maybe read this whole thread again. i never said that there are directly hateful tweets towards the LGBT+ community of hers still out there - that's just what the other GQP nutter just straw-manned my AOC quote as, in order to deflect from the obvious truth of her promoting these baseless conspiracies - and you uncritically accepted that pivot, and acted like it's something i actually said, lol.

This post was edited by fender on Nov 22 2022 11:59am