Argue with your own strawman.
Every billionaire is a failure of society.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on May 28 2021 12:43am

Read perfectly well "Ownership whilst others are starving is more unjust than theft." Literally translates - having/owning stuff while others are starving/having nothing is not just or worse then stealing.

IT assumes that having things while others don't is unjust. As i said on a surface that's retarded so UNLESS he expands his meaning which i didn't "reach" or assumed because i am not a mind reader then maybe we can have a different conversation. Until then he is a dull boy for sure

This post was edited by addone on May 28 2021 12:52am

what strawman? "Every billionaire is a failure of society" this yet again is a straight up dumb assumptious statement and non sequitur

This post was edited by addone on May 28 2021 12:57am

No it is a fact.

give me those fax you smoking boi

Billionaires without exception exist due to exploitation, if there is billionaires and homeless within the same society then the society has failed, its simple, we allow people to be exploited for the good of the few, a society should protect the good of the many.

A person who chooses to use force to take what hey want from another does not lend the characteristic "rightful" to their possession of what they took. They have taken it, and hold the power to do with it as they please, but the state of rightfulness is not conferred. Rightful is derived from reason, just as natural rights are. If I get on a plane to China and steal something from someone there, and I have never participated in their social contract, that doesn't mean what I have done is right, or that they have no claim to put me through their courts to punish me for my behavior. If I produce something of value, and you use force to take some of it from me - even with (empty) promises to return it to me through your choices of "investment," the decision to take is yours and reason dictates that without my consent, you have stolen it.

So you want anarchy but with ownership?

You got it.

The world should live on the same income. No jobs is more important than others.

Heck , people who entertain the mass are the most paid because you wouldn't comply with the system if your life was 100% work. It's their way to appease the slaves.

When there's women who make 300-400k a month for sitting in a hot tub in their bedroom, you know the world is a sad place and there's a bunch of losers enabling that.

Money mean nothing. Only your time worth something.

This post was edited by SunnyvaleTrailerPark on May 28 2021 05:30am

I think some jobs are worth more than others, doctors, scientists, vetinarians, not "mining corporation owner" or "exploiter of workers".
No one became a billionaire because they worked hard, every billionaire figured out a way to exploit other people or steal resources to get there.
Except satoshi.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on May 28 2021 05:50am