d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Lgbt Terrorist Bombs Church
Prev1141516171821Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Feb 4 2021 12:17am
Quote (Handcuffs @ 3 Feb 2021 22:15)
I don't support bombing either of them.


Quote (Handcuffs @ 2 Feb 2021 18:54)
This isn't terrorism. It's activism and protection against a church that wants LGBT people to be killed.


Quote (Handcuffs @ 2 Feb 2021 19:09)
Also, this is self-defense.


Quote (Handcuffs @ 2 Feb 2021 20:33)
I don't share your reverence for the law, or your disdain for terrorism.


Do go on.
Member
Posts: 22,440
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Feb 4 2021 12:25am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 3 2021 10:17pm)
Do go on.


Pretty straight-forward.

Is this specific instance terrorism? No.
If it was indeed done by an LGBT person, then they do probably view it as activism and self-defense? Maybe.
Do I support it? No.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Feb 4 2021 12:28am
Quote (Handcuffs @ 3 Feb 2021 22:25)
Is this specific instance terrorism? No.


Terrorism: the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives

So, you don't support bombing a place of worship, but you're defending the act and claiming it's not terrorism at all when it clearly is? Interesting. Tell us more.
Member
Posts: 22,440
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Feb 4 2021 12:31am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 3 2021 10:28pm)
Terrorism: the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives

So, you don't support bombing a place of worship, but you're defending the act and claiming it's not terrorism at all when it clearly is? Interesting. Tell us more.


Terrorism is perspectival.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Feb 4 2021 12:36am
Quote (Handcuffs @ 3 Feb 2021 22:31)
Terrorism is perspectival.


I literally just quoted the Federal Code of Regulations definition of Terrorism. Word for word. This qualifies.

And you continue to make excuses for it. How can you claim not to support it?
Member
Posts: 22,440
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Feb 4 2021 01:15am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 3 2021 10:36pm)
I literally just quoted the Federal Code of Regulations definition of Terrorism. Word for word. This qualifies.

And you continue to make excuses for it. How can you claim not to support it?


Like I said, I don't share your reverence for institutions and laws. One could say that homosexuality is a mental illness because it was deemed so by the APA until a resolution in 1973.

This post was edited by Handcuffs on Feb 4 2021 01:17am
Member
Posts: 3,381
Joined: Nov 24 2012
Gold: 1,300.00
Feb 4 2021 01:18am
Sometimes I bury myself in my backyard and pretend I’m a carrot.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Feb 4 2021 01:25am
Quote (Handcuffs @ 3 Feb 2021 23:15)
Like I said, I don't share your reverence for institutions and laws. Prior to 1969 one could say that homosexuality is a mental illness because it was deemed so by the APA until a resolution in 1973.


It's laws and institutions that have established your ability to be homosexual and yet retain all the protections of the law.

Move to Iran, tell us how it works out for you.

The entire point is to provide equal protections to all under the law. So it's perfectly legal for you to say Fundamental Christians are complete idiots and should be executed by the state. You have that right. Likewise, the fundamentals have the right to say that sodomites are sinners violating their god's laws, and the government should execute them. Both are simple speech. Now, when you attempt to defend LGBT people bombing a church and call it "self-defense" over protected speech? Okay, LGBT activists have been incredibly harsh against Christianity, and have said a lot of crazy things that should be done to or against them. So would it not be "self defense" for the Fundamentalists to go and start bombing any and all LGBT establishments in their own self-defense?

Your very stance is the exact reason so many fought so hard for so long to prevent LGBT rights. "Give an inch, they'll take a mile, then your life." It's like if I call you a poo poo head and so you punch me. Okay, now I know you're going to violently attack me when I'm simply exercising my right to speech. So, next time, KNOWING you're going to attack me, why shouldn't I simply stab you and forget speech?
Member
Posts: 3,381
Joined: Nov 24 2012
Gold: 1,300.00
Feb 4 2021 01:33am
You have the right to hate. You do not have the right to kill,attempt to kill or physically harm. /thread

This post was edited by UmadLoL on Feb 4 2021 01:34am
Member
Posts: 22,440
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Feb 4 2021 01:39am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 3 2021 11:25pm)
It's laws and institutions that have established your ability to be homosexual and yet retain all the protections of the law.

Move to Iran, tell us how it works out for you.

The entire point is to provide equal protections to all under the law. So it's perfectly legal for you to say Fundamental Christians are complete idiots and should be executed by the state. You have that right. Likewise, the fundamentals have the right to say that sodomites are sinners violating their god's laws, and the government should execute them. Both are simple speech. Now, when you attempt to defend LGBT people bombing a church and call it "self-defense" over protected speech? Okay, LGBT activists have been incredibly harsh against Christianity, and have said a lot of crazy things that should be done to or against them. So would it not be "self defense" for the Fundamentalists to go and start bombing any and all LGBT establishments in their own self-defense?

Your very stance is the exact reason so many fought so hard for so long to prevent LGBT rights. "Give an inch, they'll take a mile, then your life." It's like if I call you a poo poo head and so you punch me. Okay, now I know you're going to violently attack me when I'm simply exercising my right to speech. So, next time, KNOWING you're going to attack me, why shouldn't I simply stab you and forget speech?


But I wouldn't punch you.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1141516171821Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll