Quote (thundercock @ Jun 17 2020 03:10pm)
That doesn't worry me at all. Why on Earth would I be worried about that when cops have gotten off time and time again? What a silly thing to be worried about.
In this climate?
The same forces that compel a DA to blatantly violate their ethical responsibilities, the same rationalizations and cynical pragmatism to sate a mob and protect yourself, the same political animus against the accused- exist for a judge and jury
I followed a case in Minnesota where an alt-right white guy went to a BLM rally with some friends to film them from afar. Even though they kept a distance and didn't interact with them, the BLM group crossed the street and surrounded them. So they started running away. Unicorn Riot actually had a video of it, 3 white guys running away as fast as they could with at least a dozen black guys chasing them as they rounded a corner. Made it back to his car, and with all the black guys about to jump him he claims he saw a silvery object in the hand of one of them, thinking the guy's cell phone was a knife, and opened fire. Five people were shot with non-life threatening injuries. At trial, he was able to show he had tried to escape (satisfying Minnesota's duty to retreat law) and only opened fire when the group was already on top of him and clearly attacking him. The prosecutors sought hate crime charges, and therefore were able to introduce non-probative and clearly prejudicial evidence about how he posted on 4chan's /k/ board and sent text racist messages back and forth with his buddies. His self defense claim was rejected, he was convicted and sentenced to 15 years in prison. Afterwards, the strib talked with jurors from the trial and one of them said;
Quote
"All of us were really surprised that people like Scarsella exist," she said. "We didn't know about websites like that were people had their little white supremacist rantings and stuff."
"I know Scarsella's face when he was found guilty. He tried to not show anything," Parker recalled. "I think he looked really surprised, like, 'Oh, wow. I thought I'd get off of this like George Zimmerman did.' But no. This is Minnesota."
Was he innocent or guilty? Knowing the facts of the case, I still am not sure which way it should actually go, there was arguable evidence he sought conflict, and arguable evidence he didn't. What I do know for sure is that he didn't get a fair trial.
Do you think the cop accused of killing Rayshard Brooks will get a fair trial?