d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Joe Biden 2020 Thread
Prev114151617181037Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 54,059
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 6 2020 04:18pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ 6 Mar 2020 22:57)


Chance of Biden winning a plurality is 94% vs Bernie's 6%. And we all know that if Biden has a plurality, the party will still nominate him and not Sanders. And there might even be a few fringe scenarios where Bernie has a tiny plurality but Biden still wins out with the Bloomberg/Buttigieg/Klobuchar delegates.

So realistically, the chances of actually becoming the nominee should be somewhere around 97% vs 3%.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Mar 6 2020 04:24pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Mar 6 2020 04:05pm)
No offense, but that's a contradiction considering your absurd $700b++ military budget.


I don't think we need every dollar of the defense budget we have to maintain our commitments. Plus, a big part of supporting allies after Trump will just require taking our boots off their necks, and supporting them. On the list of priorities with South Korea, "unfair" trade deals and the cost of our military presence are basically non-issues.

You can't attack South Korea one day over a trade deal, suspend military operations that increase their readiness the next, and on the third day expect them to stand with us completely against North Korea. We need a coherent government response to these problems, not helter-skelter from a guy who can't even read a briefing book.

Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 6 2020 04:14pm)
DNC announced its changing its next debate criterion from "has any pledged delegates" to "has at least 20% of the pledged delegates" so it can exclude Tulsi and keep Biden/Sanders
now, nevermind how it would be less corrosive to democracy if they gave up their pretense of an ostensibly neutral threshold when they're obviously micromanaging it arbitrarily-
what I wonder is, why does Tulsi stay with the democrats at all, anyway?
if they're not going to play fair and hurl more abuse on her than any republican save trump or mcconnell, why stay affiliated? Why not just run for president as an Independent if that's what she wants
threatening to split the vote would have been legitimate leverage to use against the DNC to keep them playing fair, but it seems like she'll just let them piss on her and call it rain


I'm sure she'll peel off all the Democrats who watch Tucker and Hannity.



Quote (ThatAlex @ Mar 6 2020 04:57pm)


538 is one of the best but I'm skeptical.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Mar 6 2020 05:50pm
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/jill-biden-hints-odds-are-against-kamala-harris-as-joe-biden-veepstakes-pick-up

Jill Biden all but rules out Kamala as VP pick

which is good, Kamala’s asburd rant about busing or whatever designed to take down Joe for no reason backfired bigtime on her, the racist that she is
Member
Posts: 54,059
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 6 2020 06:05pm
Quote (excellence @ 7 Mar 2020 00:50)
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/jill-biden-hints-odds-are-against-kamala-harris-as-joe-biden-veepstakes-pick-up

Jill Biden all but rules out Kamala as VP pick

which is good, Kamala’s asburd rant about busing or whatever designed to take down Joe for no reason backfired bigtime on her, the racist that she is



It also makes no sense strategically. Biden's rationale for why he can beat Trump is centered on his appeal to Obama-Trump voters in the Midwest, and Harris has less than zero appeal to this demographic.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Mar 6 2020 06:23pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 6 2020 04:14pm)
DNC announced its changing its next debate criterion from "has any pledged delegates" to "has at least 20% of the pledged delegates" so it can exclude Tulsi and keep Biden/Sanders
now, nevermind how it would be less corrosive to democracy if they gave up their pretense of an ostensibly neutral threshold when they're obviously micromanaging it arbitrarily-
what I wonder is, why does Tulsi stay with the democrats at all, anyway?
if they're not going to play fair and hurl more abuse on her than any republican save trump or mcconnell, why stay affiliated? Why not just run for president as an Independent if that's what she wants
threatening to split the vote would have been legitimate leverage to use against the DNC to keep them playing fair, but it seems like she'll just let them piss on her and call it rain


She is actually an idiot for not dropping out by now. She is as bad as Warren.
Member
Posts: 54,059
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 6 2020 06:39pm
Quote (Skinned @ 7 Mar 2020 01:23)
She is actually an idiot for not dropping out by now. She is as bad as Warren.


Why was she even in this race? She never had any chance of going anywhere, and given her distance to the party establishment, she also cant use it to raise her national profile for subsequent runs for political office, or to apply for a cushy job at a liberal think tank or anything like that.
Member
Posts: 50,707
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
Mar 7 2020 03:28am
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/orourke-endorsement-triggers-false-posts-on-bidens-gun-policy/

I miss reading good old fashioned propaganda dressed up as "Fact checks". I don't bother to even click these sites enough anymore to appreciate their bullshit
Apparently Joe Biden gets to bring O'Rourke in to act as his gun policy czar and adopt his platform as a means to pander to far-left liberals, but his corporate media surrogates can simultaneously deny he holds any of O'Rourke's positions and has made no such official commitments. Its "false posts" and "disinformation" to claim that Biden supports gun confiscation when he appoints the #1 gun confiscator in the country to lead a gun confiscation agenda.
Member
Posts: 3,202
Joined: Jan 12 2020
Gold: 4.00
Warn: 40%
Mar 7 2020 05:11am
Tulsi is not a democratic rofl
she's a good trell tho. i bet she's having fun. and why not, tbh. i'd do that too if i were her. no fluxes given
Member
Posts: 3,202
Joined: Jan 12 2020
Gold: 4.00
Warn: 40%
Mar 7 2020 05:13am
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 7 2020 05:28am)
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/orourke-endorsement-triggers-false-posts-on-bidens-gun-policy/

I miss reading good old fashioned propaganda dressed up as "Fact checks". I don't bother to even click these sites enough anymore to appreciate their bullshit
Apparently Joe Biden gets to bring O'Rourke in to act as his gun policy czar and adopt his platform as a means to pander to far-left liberals, but his corporate media surrogates can simultaneously deny he holds any of O'Rourke's positions and has made no such official commitments. Its "false posts" and "disinformation" to claim that Biden supports gun confiscation when he appoints the #1 gun confiscator in the country to lead a gun confiscation agenda.


lol the best (or worst) of both worlds
get to eat the cake and anally insert it, too
Member
Posts: 105,123
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Mar 7 2020 05:40am


Romney to support subpoena in Senate probe of Hunter Biden

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-biden-senate/romney-to-support-subpoena-in-senate-probe-of-hunter-biden-idUSKBN20T2LL

Quote
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senator Mitt Romney will vote to allow a subpoena in a Senate Republican investigation of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s businessman son, Hunter Biden, his office said on Friday.

A day after Romney told reporters that the probe appeared to be political, a spokeswoman said the Utah Republican decided to back the subpoena after being assured that the records and witness interview sought would not create a public spectacle.


Quote
Democrats have warned that the investigation could aid disinformation efforts by Russia.




And ofc, the Dems claim any investigation into Hunter will aid Russia's efforts. :/
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev114151617181037Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll