Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 30 2019 02:02pm)
Nah I've never used genitals to make the pronoun determination. Its always been based on secondary and tertiary characteristics. You've never used genitals, you've just adopted the talking point.
now you're just being overly semantic. any time i used the phrase "used genitals" i was, from memory, speaking about ancient times when no clothes were used. not just for fun, but to provide a baseline in the timeline from when pronouns were first created. that era also accounts for about what? 50,000-100,000 years of human existence? it's relevant data.
honestly we're going in circles and i'm not sure why. i've reduced this down to as simple and agreeable terms as i can. now on response #20 you're strawmanning me? "adopting the talking point", pretty ironic for someone going to bat for gaslighting sjws.
it's really simple, gosh it's almost tiring repeating that 12 posts in a row with no traction. "boy" was 99.999% correlated with "has penis" for thousands of years, now people are trying to change that. the same goes for "girl". is even that something you can agree with? i gave you the venn diagram explanation like 8 posts ago lol. still circling the drain tho...
This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 30 2019 01:16pm