Youtube videos and some images that are still completely irrelevant to the context? You are absolutely laughable.

The NIST final report is 300+ pages long. I've read it before because we've had more idiots like you on this forum.

French education really is fucking terrible good lord. It's no wonder you guys stick to publishing in French journals, you wouldn't get a single one through review in English journals.

Yes .. it's right. But you dont get it either.
Density, resistance, some others things matters too..

Now if you throw a potato at 1000 mph right in the center of this thing



What does happen ? Does the potato gets sliced or does the metal grid gets evaporated like the steel beams ?

The thing will probably break, would love to see it.


This post was edited by Knoppie on Sep 15 2018 10:05am

Our American friends might have a device that can propel a very tiny bit of lead(so soft!) at around ~600mph. I think we should volunteer this guy's head as the testing subject. After all, bone has more strength per unit weight than steel.

lmao you mad bro ?

Un-independant study that contradicts itself - check
NIST is 99% correct but for some details, like thoses 3/300 pages, it got cutted into pieces right here and I'm pretty convinced you aren't able to contradict this work
http://aitia.fr/erd/jerome-quirant-et-le-gros-navion/

french education ? I've been to U.L.B, Brussels. and did a bio-engineer master. Top 100 university in world
let me know who you are since I and some physic Pr are so "laughable" to you.
France and Belgium are like the most advanced countries in europe, producing engineers for all over the world including u.s. and Holland probably too hehe.
I work in a chemical lab in Luxembourg so idc about being proven wrong on a subject I havent studied much. But it seems that you dont really know better yourself if you believe NIST blindly.
You dont know what you're talking about bro

This post was edited by Melatonina on Sep 15 2018 10:00am

I'm not even sure what you're trying to argue here. Saying there was no deceleration at all is ridiculous. The plane was traveling at over 700 feet per second. If there was no deceleration, the second plane (which we all saw hit the tower live, or on video) would have continued on its path past the tower and fallen into East Manhattan well past the WTC.

If you're trying to say that aluminum couldn't have done that much damage to steel, then you're completely misunderstanding the physics at play here.

I meant, no deceleration during the penetration...

Well I guess we are a lot to not understand physic all over the world, thousands of scientifics, engineers, physicians .. but good thing SurfPunk and all his friends are right, simply because NIST (aka the u.s state) says so.

Why no pilot is able to show us how to perform a 270° turn at 500 + mph and <1km height ?

Thats right bro, no professional pilot could do that so Mohammed asshat couldn't either.

deal with it

But there was deceleration. The towers were 208 feet wide. At the speed the planes were traveling, they would cross that distance in 1/4 second. The video belies your notion of no deceleration. And just because no professional pilot is willing to put a $50 million+ airliner through that maneuver doesn't mean they are incapable of doing so.

Plenty of YT vids out there of amateurs playing a flight sim doing that exact flight.

Card was better :/