d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Indian Reservations In America
Prev1141516171819Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 49,888
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Jul 2 2018 08:00pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Jul 3 2018 02:47am)
So you still haven’t clarified where exactly I misrepresented the argument. If I did you would be able to articulate It on the topic of ids. This is the 3rd time I’m asking you to show how exactly I misrepresented the argument and you dodge.

I’m starting to think you’re on the spectrum because too often you have these very basic semantic fopas. Instead of just moving on you’re so proud that you have to get the last word.


You do not have to have autism to be invested in an argument.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 2 2018 08:57pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Jul 2 2018 08:00pm)
You do not have to have autism to be invested in an argument.


He knows. He does this every time he makes a dumb mistake. Next thread it will be something else. Meanwhile the only problem I keep pointing out is that his reading comprehension tanks when he realizes hes losing.
Member
Posts: 105,120
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jul 2 2018 09:02pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jul 2 2018 10:57pm)
He knows. He does this every time he makes a dumb mistake. Next thread it will be something else. Meanwhile the only problem I keep pointing out is that his reading comprehension tanks when he realizes hes losing.


Losing what? His opinion?

Member
Posts: 28,856
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Jul 2 2018 09:58pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Jul 2 2018 07:00pm)
You do not have to have autism to be invested in an argument.


Is your English comprehension this bad? I said he seems to be on the spectrum because of semantic faux pas that he has regularly when trying to argue me, not because he isn't invested in an argument.


Quote (Thor123422 @ Jul 2 2018 07:57pm)
He knows. He does this every time he makes a dumb mistake. Next thread it will be something else. Meanwhile the only problem I keep pointing out is that his reading comprehension tanks when he realizes hes losing.


Still haven't addressed how i inaccurately represented the id argument. I actually provided an argument for my position while you just keep spamming one sentence platitudes completely unrelated to my actual point.

It's pretty funny tbh your posting is pretty predictable and it goes something along these lines:

>Make some shallow point or claim that is usually no longer than a line or two.
>Someone calls you out on the claim because it's inaccurate or you haven't provided enough supporting detail for your claim
>Usually dodge the original argument and go on tangents or something loosely related
> Once you get called out, you turn to your usual defensive mechanism of saying the person is too stupid to understand or how in the past you've won or established something, therefore there's no reason to discuss things further, etc.

Whether it's me, Cambo, Goom or other posters, its usually the same formula. I have nothing to prove against you, your intellectual cowardice has been on display for years now.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 2 2018 10:15pm
I actually did address it, and it was pretty clear and concise. Sorry your reading comprehension is so poor.

Rest is just your butthurt. I can have decent conversation with pretty much everybody here, you can only with like three people because once you find out they disagree your reading comprehension turns to zero.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jul 2 2018 10:16pm
Member
Posts: 49,888
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Jul 2 2018 10:35pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Jul 3 2018 02:58pm)
Is your English comprehension this bad? I said he seems to be on the spectrum because of semantic faux pas that he has regularly when trying to argue me, not because he isn't invested in an argument.




Still haven't addressed how i inaccurately represented the id argument. I actually provided an argument for my position while you just keep spamming one sentence platitudes completely unrelated to my actual point.

It's pretty funny tbh your posting is pretty predictable and it goes something along these lines:

>Make some shallow point or claim that is usually no longer than a line or two.
>Someone calls you out on the claim because it's inaccurate or you haven't provided enough supporting detail for your claim
>Usually dodge the original argument and go on tangents or something loosely related
> Once you get called out, you turn to your usual defensive mechanism of saying the person is too stupid to understand or how in the past you've won or established something, therefore there's no reason to discuss things further, etc.

Whether it's me, Cambo, Goom or other posters, its usually the same formula. I have nothing to prove against you, your intellectual cowardice has been on display for years now.


And i am saying, you saying he is autistic because he debates you this way is ignorant and crass.
Not to mention you are JUST as bad as he is.
Literally every time you reach a point where you realize some one will not just agree with you, you turn into a shit poster and just spam the same crap for days.
Strangely enough cambo is the worst of the worst here for this shit and you bring him up as an example.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Jul 2 2018 10:37pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 2 2018 10:59pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Jul 2 2018 10:35pm)
Not to mention you are JUST as bad as he is.


The difference is I'm actually capable of having a good conversation ^_^

void goes off the rails like this with EVERYBODY. Every time he engages with anybody his reading comprehension has a total breakdown when they disagree with him.

Meanwhile I only do this crap with void, because his problem really is his poor reading comprehension stemming from emotional outrage that he has to justify a point.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jul 2 2018 11:03pm
Member
Posts: 5,469
Joined: Jun 12 2018
Gold: 7,365.00
Jul 3 2018 01:50am
USA #1

#TheWestIsTheBest
Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Jul 3 2018 09:33am
Quote (Ghot @ Jul 1 2018 06:59pm)
Let's just assume that's true. You saying the jobless and the homeless, are gonna be worried about voting?


/e As far as I'm concerned, all forms of ID should be free to obtain.


Yes, I have met several who vote every election. Obviously they don't vote at the same rate as the general public, but they still do vote. And yes, I.D. should be free to obtain; that would remove one barrier of access and make voter I.D. laws closer to reasonable.

I've lived my life near San Francisco and San Luis Obispo, both of which have large homeless populations. I've volunteered in soup kitchens and homeless shelters. I've spoken with them, made acquaintances that lasted years, and played with their children. I'd wager I've spent more time conversing with poor blacks, whites, and Latinos than most users on this subforum.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Jul 1 2018 07:00pm)
Your analogy is garbage. The left has long perpetuated that voter ID laws discriminate against blacks. Blacks are just as capable as whites or any other race at obtaining basic things like a photo ID that is almost a necessity in our world today. The fact that there's whites out there that think blacks are somehow less able to do this is pretty fucking racist.


It is not a racial trait, it is a socioeconomic trait. Did you even read what I wrote?

Obtaining official documents is more difficult for those who do not have the money, time, or transport to obtain said documents. Blacks and Latinos are disproportionately represented among the population who do not have the time, money, or transport to obtain said documents. Blacks and Latinos disproportionately vote Democrat. It is apparent to anyone with eyes that voter I.D. laws are an attempt to suppress minority vote for political gain.
Member
Posts: 105,120
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jul 3 2018 09:57am
Quote (BardOfXiix @ Jul 3 2018 11:33am)


Obtaining official documents is more difficult for those who do not have the money, time, or transport to obtain said documents. Blacks and Latinos are disproportionately represented among the population who do not have the time, money, or transport to obtain said documents. Blacks and Latinos disproportionately vote Democrat. It is apparent to anyone with eyes that voter I.D. laws are an attempt to suppress minority vote for political gain.



Voter ID has nothing to do with race, w/e you may assume. It is to prevent voter fraud.
I think voter fraud should be more of a worry than the tiny amount of unemployed and/or homeless that this might affect.

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1141516171819Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll