d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia Collusion, Obstruction Of Justice Exposed
Prev1141516171826Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 105,142
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Oct 19 2017 09:31am
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 19 2017 11:26am)
I'd like to point out how conspicuous it is that even 2 hours after Trump tweeted about it, its still not on any of the MSM (other than fox)
Not even the obligatory "trump tweeted about it" articles they run in 20 seconds after each tweet. Not even hatchet jobs accusing him of pushing an old narrative
The only new sources to join in the festivities are politico ("Trump: Russia uranium deal 'biggest story that Fake Media' ignores") and Huffpo ("Donald Trump Accuses 'Fake Media' Of Not Reporting An Actual Fake News Story"), the latter with the hatchet job article
No ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, WaPo, NYT

This is the new york times.
The NYT are the ones who posted this story:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Now this is their current coverage of their own scoop:
https://www.google.com/search?q=site:nytimes.com%20uranium&tbs=cdr:1,cd_min:10/16/2017,cd_max:&tbm=




Well, we already know the "fakenews" networks are in the pockets of the Democrats at the moment. In order for them to report on this latest news, they would be, in effect, purgering themselves...if this were a court case.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Oct 19 2017 09:32am
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 19 2017 08:26am)
I'd like to point out how conspicuous it is that even 2 hours after Trump tweeted about it, its still not on any of the MSM (other than fox)
Not even the obligatory "trump tweeted about it" articles they run in 20 seconds after each tweet. Not even hatchet jobs accusing him of pushing an old narrative
The only new sources to join in the festivities are politico ("Trump: Russia uranium deal 'biggest story that Fake Media' ignores") and Huffpo ("Donald Trump Accuses 'Fake Media' Of Not Reporting An Actual Fake News Story"), the latter with the hatchet job article
No ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, WaPo, NYT

This is the new york times.
The NYT are the ones who posted this story:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Now this is their current coverage of their own scoop:
https://www.google.com/search?q=site:nytimes.com%20uranium&tbs=cdr:1,cd_min:10/16/2017,cd_max:&tbm=



By this point I’m not sure how people don’t realize that the MSM is more focused on controlling perspective rather than reporting news. Do people really think mega news corporations are going to be objective and report something that isn’t in their best interests?
Member
Posts: 105,142
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Oct 19 2017 09:39am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 19 2017 11:32am)
By this point I’m not sure how people don’t realize that the MSM is more focused on controlling perspective rather than reporting news. Do people really think mega news corporations are going to be objective and report something that isn’t in their best interests?



Not only isn't it in their best interest, but would make it obvious that they have been trying to "control perspective" rather than report....for a while now.
This kind of thing would really damage their credibility...for a long, long time.


/e Most if not all of them, reported last year that they were 100% sure that this Clinton-Obama-Uranium news was all fake. Now that those documents came out, which pretty much prove that the Obama administration was up to it's neck in collusion...

My take is they are trying to figure out exactly how to report this without hanging themselves in the process.

This post was edited by Ghot on Oct 19 2017 09:43am
Member
Posts: 50,891
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Oct 19 2017 09:40am
Quote (Ghot @ Oct 19 2017 09:39am)
their credibility


??
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Oct 19 2017 09:41am
Yes thats old news released a long time ago in NYT, you can see that even earlier in this topic with ghot (that was a genius here) and made a screen shot of a google search.

Your guys are beating a dead horse, while supporting a president that was directly, massively, favorized by russia.
No shame, it's okay.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Oct 19 2017 09:42am
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Oct 19 2017 09:48am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Oct 19 2017 08:41am)
Yes that was posted a long time ago in NYT, you can see that even earlier in this topic with ghot (that was a genius here) and made a screen shot of a google search.

Your guys are beating a dead horse, while supporting a president that was directly, massively, favorized by russia.
No shame, it's okay.



This McCarthyism that Russia is categorically bad and that we need to diametrically oppose them is getting old.

I’m happy Russia meddled and helped Trump. It’s a net good for this country and my homeland in Eastern Europe which is very close to Ukraine and Russia. Syrian war is coming to and end, Ukrainian War has pretty much quieted down. Both of these would be raging on if Clinton was president.

So many of you have no understanding of cause & effect and what certain things would mean. You’re so glued to tweets and propaganda that you fail to see glaring realities.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Oct 19 2017 09:51am
Member
Posts: 105,142
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Oct 19 2017 09:49am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Oct 19 2017 11:41am)
Yes thats old news released a long time ago in NYT, you can see that even earlier in this topic with ghot (that was a genius here) and made a screen shot of a google search.

Your guys are beating a dead horse, while supporting a president that was directly, massively, favorized by russia.
No shame, it's okay.




Wrong topic, yet again. There already is a Russiagate topic, although NOW it looks kind of silly. Doesn't it?

Mueller, Comey, Hillary, Obama and quite a few mid level management in the Obama administration are gonna hang for this.
I can kinda understand why the news agencies might be seriously taking their time before putting anything down in print. :/

It'd be like... oh sorry about all that stuff we reported to you, which had NO basis in fact, and that we are still reporting to you. It was all a mistake. But we are serious about only reporting facts to you.
The fact that we spent the past year and a half forgetting that we should have facts before claiming we do, was just an aberration.



/e Once again just for our resident Frenchman...


Even though the big news agencies aren't playing yet, it seems the Senate Judiciary Committee seems to think there IS something to the report made by TheHill.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355957-senate-judiciary-opens-probe-into-obama-era-russian-nuclear-bribery

This post was edited by Ghot on Oct 19 2017 10:04am
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Oct 19 2017 10:10am
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 19 2017 10:26am)
I'd like to point out how conspicuous it is that even 2 hours after Trump tweeted about it, its still not on any of the MSM (other than fox)
Not even the obligatory "trump tweeted about it" articles they run in 20 seconds after each tweet. Not even hatchet jobs accusing him of pushing an old narrative
The only new sources to join in the festivities are politico ("Trump: Russia uranium deal 'biggest story that Fake Media' ignores") and Huffpo ("Donald Trump Accuses 'Fake Media' Of Not Reporting An Actual Fake News Story"), the latter with the hatchet job article
No ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, WaPo, NYT

This is the new york times.
The NYT are the ones who posted this story:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Now this is their current coverage of their own scoop:
https://www.google.com/search?q=site:nytimes.com%20uranium&tbs=cdr:1,cd_min:10/16/2017,cd_max:&tbm=


Yeah... pretty strange.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 19 2017 10:48am)
This McCarthyism that Russia is categorically bad and that we need to diametrically oppose them is getting old.

I’m happy Russia meddled and helped Trump. It’s a net good for this country and my homeland in Eastern Europe which is very close to Ukraine and Russia. Syrian war is coming to and end, Ukrainian War has pretty much quieted down. Both of these would be raging on if Clinton was president.

So many of you have no understanding of cause & effect and what certain things would mean. You’re so glued to tweets and propaganda that you fail to see glaring realities.




This post was edited by IceMage on Oct 19 2017 10:11am
Member
Posts: 10,060
Joined: Mar 30 2010
Gold: 10,779.02
Oct 19 2017 10:19am
Looks like the past admin/Clinton ship is the only one that will be sinking with this Russian Collusion story.

Russian Collusion confirmed, it just happened to be Obama/Clinton and not Drumpf.

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1141516171826Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll