Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Oct 19 2017 11:41am)
Yes thats old news released a long time ago in NYT, you can see that even earlier in this topic with ghot (that was a genius here) and made a screen shot of a google search.
Your guys are beating a dead horse, while supporting a president that was directly, massively, favorized by russia.
No shame, it's okay.
Wrong topic, yet again. There already is a Russiagate topic, although NOW it looks kind of silly. Doesn't it?
Mueller, Comey, Hillary, Obama and quite a few mid level management in the Obama administration are gonna hang for this.
I can kinda understand why the news agencies might be seriously taking their time before putting anything down in print. :/
It'd be like... oh sorry about all that stuff we reported to you, which had NO basis in fact, and that we are still reporting to you. It was all a mistake. But we are serious about only reporting facts to you.
The fact that we spent the past year and a half forgetting that we should have facts before claiming we do, was just an aberration.
/e Once again just for our resident Frenchman...
Even though the big news agencies aren't playing yet, it seems the Senate Judiciary Committee seems to think there IS something to the report made by TheHill.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355957-senate-judiciary-opens-probe-into-obama-era-russian-nuclear-briberyThis post was edited by Ghot on Oct 19 2017 10:04am