I punch you.

You don't retaliate.

I tell my friend "yeah, he just lets you punch him"

By your logic its not assault.

You're reasoning skills are pathetic, and it's obvious to everybody except you that the erection in your pants is for Trump.

you've never asked "wanna go back to my place?"

Or "are we good to do this?"

Asking for consent doesn't need a damn release form...

Lets suspend reality for a moment:

You have sex with someone

You tell your friend "xe let me have sex with them"

by your logic that is rape.

Your* reasoning skills are pathetic, and its obvious that you try to use petty insults and snobbery as a crutch for being inferior.

You replaced a commonly consensual action with "punching" which is almost always not consensual, and then you have the temerity to accuse me of having poor reasoning skills HAH

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Oct 30 2017 07:50am

Nope, I haven't given what I consider to be necessary for consent.

However, you have shown that the only thing you consider necessary for somebody to give consent is to not resist.

Once again, you're pathetic. (Also posting from phone)

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 30 2017 07:53am

Physical violence and sexual consent are the same thing now?
perhaps it is for you but in this instance it's best to speak for yourself not others

hollywood all pedos

Did i show that? or are you making shit up, jumping to amateur conclusions, and insulting me again after i pointed out how imbecilic you and your tactics are?

Yes, you did.

I'm sorry you can't do two-step problems, but another example of "almost always not consensual" is "grabbing by the pussy"

obviously your reasoning skills cant measure up to thor with his hammer thats been beating him over his head





What do you think is inherently non-consensual about grabbing someone by the pussy?

you make the same idiotic comment about two step problems all the time when it doesnt fit. Its a vacuous tactic to insult me rather than admit you were wrong or having to provide an argument.
Do you not see the obvious merit in me pointing out the pertinent differences between punching someone and sexual acts? Your analogy was obviously fallacious and dissimilar where it counted.

How about you admit you were wrong (and laughably hypocritical) instead of continuing this charade?

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Oct 30 2017 08:10am

I don't need to admit I'm wrong when I'm using a carbon-copy of the qualifications you just stated. You're just using special pleading to exclude one and not the other.

Not resisting or pressing charges doesn't change assault to not assault. You're making the same argument as the people who say "she wasn't raped, she didn't fight back".