Shucks, why didn't I consider cultural consensus when coming up with my conclusions, gather round now, we shall vote democratically to come to a popular meaning as to what things should be like. You're killing me, man, this is like talking to a carbon copy from /r/communism

Biology is linked harmoniously with the environment and they both influence each other in ways not yet understood or calculated, cultural variation is still shown to have a huge bias in liberal academia and has succeeded in halting biological variations from being considered.

sounds like your incorrect with that last statement. genetics play a role in dsyphoria

Apparently, you don't understand what negligible means, if an unsubstantial amount of people are born freaks, why would I even consider them as anything but outside of the norm, potentially genetic refuse. First we should cover some ground rules, do you understand what normal is? In the realm of the norm, there is a binary and all-else is outside of this.

Maybe you can do binary math, since you're so keen on bringing up math



So there are two binaries here, the first condition determines if you're human (e.g., male or female) and all else is rightfully discarded into the binary bin. There's no reason to go beyond a base-2 system of understanding for gender, there is only male or female and anything apart from this is a natural abomination, evolution's test of my resolve most likely.



woosh, there's a reason that reply was for Gastly, he is on a different level than yourself and able to read between the lines.


This post was edited by j0ltk0la on Jan 22 2015 04:37pm

i never argued anything that would suggest i dont understand norms, i clearly stated transsexual individuals are abnormal at least 5 times. Why would you consider variables when defining a term? hmm i dont know maybe because that the only way to concretely define something as a fact. The fact that you dont consider the percentages, which are i admit are statistically small, has nothing to do with the definition of gender as a spectrum. In fact the statistical outliers tell us much more about the spectrum than those who conform the the norm.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jan 22 2015 04:45pm

so... if we are to presume that there is a huge conspiracy to stop research from being done, submitted and reviewed?
well, i can grant you that much. now how about a nice little rant about cultural marxism? i mean, that liberal bias must be the only reasons to why 18:th century racial theories and whatnot have generally fallen out of favour.
there's a reason to why Papua New-Guinea and Amazon are popular places for research.

it takes a whole new sort of silly to presume that humans aren't beings that work and act according to their environments, in the environments and in the world. it's kind of the reason to why there's humans from Greenland to Australia. it's also the reason to the huge amount of practices, norms and rules and variation within them that can be found.
the Fa'afafine of Samoa really exemplify what i'm getting at.

This post was edited by Gastly on Jan 22 2015 04:58pm

it's male and not male, if you're going to talk about binary do it right

This post was edited by duffman316 on Jan 22 2015 04:59pm

You're either against the patriarchy or you're part of the patriarchy.

p v ~p

That is all.

pvp me ill rek u 5-0

Thats kind of sad.

If you were married, would you not care about the personal happiness of your wife?

Or do you not care about the well being of your siblings if you have any?

y so selfish