Quote (Santara @ Nov 26 2013 11:18pm)
I studied the rules of the road, if that's what you mean. You know, the 50-70 page manual of traffic laws for passenger cars. I also studied another one for commercial vehicle operation. If you're talking about the entire litigious history of driving since ever, no I haven't.
Again, did you, or did you not get a driver's license?
You studied a book that guides you through the steps necessary to "pass a simple test" that any fucking child can complete. Your "commercial" test is the same thing. Big deal. You want a medal or something? How about a big shiny star to show your classmates?
The facts are simple. You DID NOT read anything in the ACT or STATUTE that surrounds your driving laws.
You don't read the acts or statutes for motor vehicles, taxes, criminal code or anything with regards to giant walls of text. I don't blame you though, nobody reads that shit and that is PRECISELY why we shouldn't have to adhere to it or agree to it either.
If you really want to sit here and defend the establishment rules that you clearly do NOT know then by all means, continue your path to serfdom. Otherwise, buckle up because it's going to be a bumpy ride filled with assholes on the lawful (not legal) road I'm driving on.
The answer to your question is yes. Yes I did get a drivers licence. I fully regret doing it in hindsight, yet there are ways to suspend it or lose it lawfully. I'm not worried about it either way because I now know what it's used for. It's used to verify your "person" (slave term) as an agent of government; by policy enforcers (police) who use this information to punish you under the acts and statutes that your legal fiction (person) is bound by. There is no law that forces you to carry a licence, only acts and statutes which are NOT laws.
This post was edited by datajunky on Nov 29 2013 12:28am