Quote (cambovenzi @ 5 Oct 2017 17:00)
Do you not know how to read in context?
i do, and i recognise a strawman when i see one - really speaks for itself that you're now desperately trying to blame my reading comprehension for this obvious dishonesty of yours.
Quote (cambovenzi @ 5 Oct 2017 17:00)
You were mocking people and dismissing gun analogies as invalid because 'muh cars are meant for driving, my boots are made for walkin' ' and 'guns r scary. they R made to KILL!!!1"
wrong again, i dismissed ONE particular analogy and provided my reasoning for it.
Quote (cambovenzi @ 5 Oct 2017 17:00)
Guns and other things are similar in some ways and different in others.
The intended or designed purpose of an item is not a valid reason to pompously reject analogies between things.
again trying to generalise the issue - why don't you just stay on topic and stop building your flimsy strawmen?
the killing of people was the common theme while comparing guns to trucks. the fact that one item is designed and optimised to do just that, while the other one is not, IS a valid reason to reject that silly talking point.
that you actually lack the common sense to realise that is almost pitiful.
Quote (cambovenzi @ 5 Oct 2017 17:00)
i wasn't saying you were literally rejecting every analogy in the history of mankind.
i never claimed you did. however, you said "all analogies" when i clearly only mentioned and criticised ONE. trying to defend your strawman with yet another fallacious claim - this is getting ridiculous...
Quote (cambovenzi @ 5 Oct 2017 17:00)
The truck observation is true. its valid for some purposes.
haha, exactly what i predicted: a desperate little deflection. you just can't admit it, can you?
Quote (cambovenzi @ 5 Oct 2017 17:00)
Im not you.
clearly you aren't, i would never make excuses for such a moronic talking point. well done, so far this is your sharpest observation in this thread, my little friend.