Sup, friend.

maybe not if you apply your usual ridiculous double standards...

Basically.



No one in Trump's base silently supported the killer. Even the killer's mother threw him under the bus.

Omar Mateen's father on the other hand told the media "he was a great guy."



O hai

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Sep 16 2017 02:03pm

no, but they theoretically would have to if they followed the rules of their holy book 100%.

and Christians would be vagrants with no money or homes, a total blight on society.

They all look ridiculous when you actually read the text on the page

true, but there are a lot more sections talking about killing/slaughtering/conquering/subduing all "infidels", i.e. all non-muslims, in the quran than in the bible or the talmud or the texts of hinduism and bhuddism.
and there are evidently more muslims who stick to a literal interpretation of their holy book and use it as inspiration for terrorism and intolerance than there are christians/jews/hindus/bhuddists/atheists doing the same with their religion (or lack thereof in the case of atheists).

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 16 2017 03:16pm

It all comes down to where they are located, and the politics of the region.

We've been systematically destabilizing the middle east for nearly a decade. Keeping the cost of exporting their resources low and keeping brutal dictators in power.

Hell, most of the radicalization that occurred in the past few decades was a direct result of the United States giving the current terrorist groups radicalizing material so they could fight a religious proxy war against the evil atheist soviets.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Sep 16 2017 03:19pm

Wow, that's a seriously different history than what I lived through.

That's because "living through" history doesn't mean you know jack shit about it.

A large number of important revelations about history isn't even revealed until decades after.