d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1147514761477147814795001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 20,253
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,267.97
Oct 3 2017 06:35am
Quote (ampoo @ Oct 3 2017 02:11pm)
why include those who were unable to care for themselves?


Because it is capitalism that turns "caring for themselves" into a competition with winners and losers.
Member
Posts: 2,295
Joined: Oct 3 2010
Gold: 4,311.90
Oct 3 2017 07:32am
Quote (balrog66 @ Oct 3 2017 05:23am)
Of course communism/socialism is responsible for all the deaths that happened in communist/socialist countries.

So that means that the same applies to capitalism too! Just the Bengal Famine caused by the British in India alone caused the deaths of between 12 and 29 million Indians. And why? The wheat was exported to Britain because it was more profitable to do so. That's not even counting the rape of Africa, the deaths due to pollution caused by capitalism, the multiple interventions by the US in South America, the War on Drugs, etc etc etc.

Don't be disingenuous and blame a system for the failures of states.


So everytime they've tried to put communism into practice it has failed miserably, and yet somehow its not the system that its wrong its the states that have implemented it. Piss off
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Oct 3 2017 07:39am
Quote (WiziLiCe @ Oct 3 2017 09:32am)
So everytime they've tried to put communism into practice it has failed miserably, and yet somehow its not the system that its wrong its the states that have implemented it. Piss off


it comes down to leftists having no interest in understanding the economics involved and trying to pretend its just the individual dictators and their regimes who failed to properly implement it.
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Oct 3 2017 07:44am
Quote (WiziLiCe @ Oct 3 2017 01:32pm)
So everytime they've tried to put communism into practice it has failed miserably, and yet somehow its not the system that its wrong its the states that have implemented it. Piss off


Try to read better. I'm not praising the Soviet style republics. I'm saying that it is disingenuous to claim that those systems are bad because they are somehow responsible for many deaths, when the Western world as a whole gleefully glosses over tens if not hundreds of millions of dead (partly) due to capitalism. And as far as the actual states go, they are not examples of communism or socialism. Lenin himself wrote that he implemented state capitalism in the post-revolution Soviet Republic.

Quote
Lenin wrote:

The state capitalism, which is one of the principal aspects of the New Economic Policy, is, under Soviet power, a form of capitalism that is deliberately permitted and restricted by the working class. Our state capitalism differs essentially from the state capitalism in countries that have bourgeois governments in that the state with us is represented not by the bourgeoisie, but by the proletariat, who has succeeded in winning the full confidence of the peasantry.
Unfortunately, the introduction of state capitalism with us is not proceeding as quickly as we would like it. For example, so far we have not had a single important concession, and without foreign capital to help develop our economy, the latter’s quick rehabilitation is inconceivable.



There is still lots of pro-communist sentiment in Russia. I heard it myself when I was there this summer. Especially among those who lived through Chruschev/Breznev era of relative prosperity and the era of Gorbachev/Yeltsin, who bankrupted the nation into a near-decade long famine. There are definite nuances that are barely mentioned in the USA, as McCarthyism is still well and alive. The USA has such a huge boner for capitalism anything that might limit it is looked at with suspicious eyes.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Oct 3 2017 08:04am


but its capitalism's fault people are starving?
in reality they need MORE capitalism in poor countries not less. mass production for the masses. efficient allocations of resources. etc.


btw lenin calling what he implemented "state capitalism" doesnt actually make communism capitalism.
capitalism by definition is private ownership and trade, rather than the state.

"The socialist movement takes great pains to circulate frequently new labels for its ideally constructed state. Each worn-out label is replaced by another which raises hopes of an ultimate solution of the insoluble basic problem of Socialism—until it becomes obvious that nothing has been changed but the name. The most recent slogan is "State Capitalism." It is not commonly realized that this covers nothing more than what used to be called Planned Economy and State Socialism, and that State Capitalism, Planned Economy, and State Socialism diverge only in non-essentials from the "classic" ideal of egalitarian Socialism."
-Ludwig von Mises
Member
Posts: 53,359
Joined: Jan 20 2009
Gold: 4,383.11
Oct 3 2017 08:09am
Quote (cambovenzi @ 3 Oct 2017 16:04)
https://ourworldindata.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/ourworldindata_world-poverty-since-1820-in-absolute-numbers.png

but its capitalism's fault people are starving?
in reality they need MORE capitalism in poor countries not less. mass production for the masses. efficient allocations of resources. etc.


btw lenin calling what he implemented "state capitalism" doesnt actually make communism capitalism.
capitalism by definition is private ownership and trade, rather than the state.

"The socialist movement takes great pains to circulate frequently new labels for its ideally constructed state. Each worn-out label is replaced by another which raises hopes of an ultimate solution of the insoluble basic problem of Socialism—until it becomes obvious that nothing has been changed but the name. The most recent slogan is "State Capitalism." It is not commonly realized that this covers nothing more than what used to be called Planned Economy and State Socialism, and that State Capitalism, Planned Economy, and State Socialism diverge only in non-essentials from the "classic" ideal of egalitarian Socialism."
-Ludwig von Mises


poor countries need more capitalism, i kinda agree, but what they really need is fewer people
Member
Posts: 33,929
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 3 2017 10:08am
Quote (balrog66 @ Oct 3 2017 07:23am)
Of course communism/socialism is responsible for all the deaths that happened in communist/socialist countries.

So that means that the same applies to capitalism too! Just the Bengal Famine caused by the British in India alone caused the deaths of between 12 and 29 million Indians. And why? The wheat was exported to Britain because it was more profitable to do so. That's not even counting the rape of Africa, the deaths due to pollution caused by capitalism, the multiple interventions by the US in South America, the War on Drugs, etc etc etc.

Don't be disingenuous and blame a system for the failures of states.



The world population would be less than 1 million without capitalism, but keep spoonfeeding yourself that bullshit.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Oct 3 2017 11:47am
Member
Posts: 33,929
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 3 2017 12:03pm
Quote (IceMage @ Oct 3 2017 01:47pm)


Anecdotal evidence isnt a statistical argument.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Oct 3 2017 12:21pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Oct 3 2017 01:03pm)
Anecdotal evidence isnt a statistical argument.


Mind=blown.

It just shows you how T_D operates. Assuming the attack was committed by an Islamic radical isn't surprising... the real humor comes when they find out it wasn't a brown dude with a Muslim name. If it doesn't fit neatly into their political narrative.... false flag fellas! Don't pretend T_D isn't filled with Infowarriors.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1147514761477147814795001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll