speaking about a fistful of howlers

















yeah good ones there, you total drain on society. you're just a tiny little ignorant privileged bigot who just failed miserably and ended up being an example of what not to be in life
race-baiting lefty useless losers like you (that pretended or decided to be a girl on the internet for fg donations, or tried to fake being an actual pollster when you're a call center employee) have the audacity claim someone needs $2.5 billion to win the Presidency. That's because scumstains like you and the loser candidate you backed so fervently can only operate with a shitload of other people's money, yet still LOSE, money grubbing sickos

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-presidential-campaign-fundraising/





obligatory: thanks for yet another fucking set of laughs!!!!

This post was edited by excellence on Sep 13 2017 02:21pm

Regurgitating a bunch of misrepresentations that you've already been exposed on while you're tap dancing on the exact same spot you were dancing on two weeks/ten months ago is an interesting, courageous choice. We're still here:



I suppose I should at least thank you for managing another own-goal by including that 9/26/17 post of mine. Good lord -- you've become a fucking caricature of yourself at this point.

your own posts are "misrepresentations"? that is your fault, young lady/man/xheshe/whatever you identify as

Obligatory: thanks for the fuckin' laugh!!!



oh really?????????

Obligatory: thanks for the fuckin' laugh!!!

This post was edited by excellence on Sep 13 2017 03:00pm

That's pretty clearly not at all what I said. I was explicit in what I was criticizing: the electoral process (specifically, the Electoral College and the first-past-the-post voting system). Not the nation being a constitutional republic.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Sep 13 2017 03:13pm

funny how the losing side always want to change the rules

I'll give you a few moments to Google the definition of "misrepresent" if you find the implication so confusing.



We have the information provided by all the principal parties + what we've learned about how the election was decided. Trump was in the same place on Sept 30 as he was on Aug 30, narrowly behind. My ordering of states into 2-3 tiers matched the eventual outcome: Trump needed to win IA (9.5), OH (8), NC (3.5), and FL (1.2) but also find a way to win other states he had been trailing heavily in all year, ultimately WI (.8), PA (.5), and MI (.2)

We found out after the election what made all this possible and in those states specifically: the Comey letter(s) moved the race an average of 3-4 points towards Trump and had a larger and disproportionate impact on white voters, especially moderate Republicans that Clinton spent considerable time courting (only to lose them to incorrect and/or hyperbolic headlines and wall-to-wall coverage in the final days). This is how we were able to see heavily-white states tighten that were otherwise thought to be noncompetitive like MN and northern ME during the same cycle that Clinton was able to make diverse states like GA, AZ, and TX tighten, even in spite of the letter(s).

None of this stuff is controversial. That's why all the dead-ender nonsense is pointless.

GA, AZ, and TX

I like how no numbers are put up on these...to lazy to google..if by tight you mean half a million that's fine

this stuff is very well controversial. the midwest was already trending red for years and long before trump stepped onto the political scene. just like GA, AZ and TX were already trending blue long before trump.

so your claim "it was the comey letter that cost clinton the election, and thats not controversial at all" is simply false.

it was a close and weird race, and there is a dozen of things that moved the polls far enough in one direction or the other that one can claim "with X/without Y, clinton would have won the election".

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/its-not-all-about-clinton-the-midwest-was-getting-redder-before-2016/
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/clinton-trump-vote-maps-2016/

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 13 2017 04:42pm

seems you still haven't found which of the howlers you claim you posted ~13 days from now (at the time of this post), and 10+ months after the election, on 9/26/17 that has been "misrepresented"

thanks for admitting i have the power to know what you're gonna post. in any event its always a rage essay of partisan nonsense totally detached from reality each time anyway.





after 15+ months of arrogantly and foolishly calling Trump and his campaign every repugant and unseemly buzzword under the sun, your only constant lame excuse is about Comey taking a look at (C)linton for associating with known sleazeball pedo and now convicted criminal weasel Anthony Weiner.



Obligatory: thanks for yet another fuckin laugh!!!!



the little fella/lady/xheshe/whatever jaykwik identifies as that calls themselves a pollster is NOT a fan of 538 or nate silver. Pollster called them majorly difficient and that custom models of his/her/xheshe's own were much better (at getting elections totally wrong)

http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=70828877&f=119&p=475871342#p475871342

This post was edited by excellence on Sep 13 2017 04:53pm

Sad.