d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > October Invasion Of Israel
Prev1146414651466146714681646Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,121
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Jul 23 2025 11:20am
I must admit I am still trying to understand the logistic's of this Humanitarian City they keep harping on about. I am trying to view this from an Israeli perspective but the notion of positive optic's associated with this plan is eluding me.


Sounds like a BS marketing buzz word.

The video you linked earlier was objectively sad as hell. People wasting away in the worst ways. Literal scenes like you see in a Holocaust history documentary or recreation scene, except real and current and in a first world nation.
Member
Posts: 56,310
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,268.61
Jul 24 2025 06:53am


dear oh dear.

one of the key takeaways from this conversation, is the narrative, or believe, from Israeli's, that if they hit the Palestinians hard enough, the Palestinians will be too broken to mount any future resistance. This is a theme we have seen repeatedly throughout this thread. They simply refuse to entertain the historical precedent that such violence breeds violence. Instead of acknowledging such precedents elsewhere in the world, or even in israel! they live in some made up reality where such violence leads to a positive result, as if its the war to end all wars.

Israel also admitted now is not the time for peace, as if anyone is surprised.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jul 24 2025 07:07am
Member
Posts: 56,310
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,268.61
Jul 24 2025 09:41am
sry for double post, returning to the hostages piece -

First Tranche of Hostages Released (~105) — Late 2023 / Early 2024

Date: Between late 2023 and early 2024 (exact dates vary by individual release groups)
Number: Approximately 105 hostages
Demographics:

~81 Israeli women and children
1 Russian-Israeli man
24 foreign nationals from various countries
Age range: Mostly women and children, spanning infants to elderly (exact ages mostly undisclosed)
Sex: Majority female and children; a few adult males

Reported Condition:

Many reported they were treated “relatively well” by Hamas captors compared to expectations
No verified reports of sexual abuse or extreme physical abuse during captivity
Some psychological trauma expected given the circumstances, but no widespread reports of torture

2. Contrasting Narratives: Palestinian Dehumanization vs Hostage Treatment

Israeli Official / Public Rhetoric:
Palestinians often referred to in harsh, dehumanizing terms: “terrorists,” “orcs,” “barbarians,” or worse by certain officials and public figures.
This language feeds a narrative that Palestinians are less than human and justifies harsh military and police actions.
Public discourse often conflates Hamas militants with the Palestinian civilian population, contributing to collective punishment rationalization.

Reality of Hostage Treatment:

Released hostages describe comparatively humane treatment by Hamas captors, despite the conditions.
No widespread evidence to support Israeli claims of systematic torture or sexual abuse of hostages by Hamas.
Some hostages even report moments of kindness or normalcy.
Treatment of Palestinian Prisoners in Israeli Custody:
Documented reports of severe abuses, including torture and sexual violence (e.g., the Sde Teiman detention camp incident).
Allegations of collective punishment, poor detention conditions, and lack of due process.
Protests from parts of Israeli society supporting abusive behavior toward Palestinian prisoners.
Clear double standards emerge: Palestinians routinely face harsh, sometimes inhumane conditions, while Israeli captives by Hamas are treated with a degree of humanity.


add-on:

For every 10 to 13 hostages Hamas released, Israel reciprocated by releasing about 30 to 39 Palestinian prisoners, reflecting an exchange ratio of roughly 3:1. This exchange happened over multiple batches, coordinated and monitored by mediators such as Qatar, Egypt, and the International Committee of the Red Cross. Israel retained veto power to exclude certain detainees from release, reflecting careful control over the process. Who Were the Palestinian Prisoners?

Women and Minors: A significant portion of those released were women and minors, many held under administrative detention. Women are often imprisoned due to political activism, protests, or family ties to militants. Despite international human rights criticism, Israel continues to detain women for offenses ranging from participation in demonstrations to alleged membership in banned organizations. Administrative Detention: This practice allows Israel to hold Palestinians without charge or trial, often for renewable six-month periods. It is justified by Israeli authorities on security grounds, but widely criticized as arbitrary detention. Many released detainees had been held under this system, some for years. Stone Throwing Offenses: A notable share of released prisoners had been detained for throwing stones—an act that in Palestinian communities is often a form of political protest but considered a serious offense by Israeli authorities. Under Israeli military law in the occupied territories, stone throwing can carry sentences from several months up to 10 years in prison, depending on circumstances such as injury caused or repeat offenses. Even minors have been sentenced to lengthy terms, sometimes disproportionate to the act, as part of a policy to deter dissent.

Why Are These Prisoners Held?

Many detainees are incarcerated not for violent crimes but for political reasons or low-level offenses linked to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The use of administrative detention without due process, the imprisonment of women often linked to activism, and the harsh sentencing for stone throwing all reflect Israel’s broader security and deterrence policies in the occupied territories.
Political and Symbolic Implications. Despite the rhetoric framing the hostages’ return as purely humanitarian, the reciprocal release of these Palestinian prisoners highlights the political realities of the exchange. The deal acknowledged Hamas’s leverage, even if Israeli officials publicly downplayed the equivalency of the prisoners involved. The careful orchestration of the exchange—batches, ratios, vetos—demonstrates a mutual, negotiated process rather than a one-sided humanitarian concession. This dynamic is critical to understand: while Israeli discourse emphasized the innocence of hostages and portrayed Palestinians broadly as “terrorists,” many of the Palestinian prisoners freed were non-violent detainees or held without formal charges. This reveals a stark asymmetry in public narratives versus actual practice, underscoring the complexity and political sensitivity surrounding the first tranche of hostage releases.

----------

If anyone wants to dispute the above, go ahead, and if not we will simply accept the above at face value. I will wait 24 hours before returning to this subject.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jul 24 2025 09:45am
Member
Posts: 18,027
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 24 2025 02:27pm
add-on:

For every 10 to 13 hostages Hamas released, Israel reciprocated by releasing about 30 to 39 Palestinian prisoners, reflecting an exchange ratio of roughly 3:1. This exchange happened over multiple batches, coordinated and monitored by mediators such as Qatar, Egypt, and the International Committee of the Red Cross. Israel retained veto power to exclude certain detainees from release, reflecting careful control over the process. Who Were the Palestinian Prisoners?

Women and Minors: A significant portion of those released were women and minors, many held under administrative detention. Women are often imprisoned due to political activism, protests, or family ties to militants. Despite international human rights criticism, Israel continues to detain women for offenses ranging from participation in demonstrations to alleged membership in banned organizations. Administrative Detention: This practice allows Israel to hold Palestinians without charge or trial, often for renewable six-month periods. It is justified by Israeli authorities on security grounds, but widely criticized as arbitrary detention. Many released detainees had been held under this system, some for years. Stone Throwing Offenses: A notable share of released prisoners had been detained for throwing stones—an act that in Palestinian communities is often a form of political protest but considered a serious offense by Israeli authorities. Under Israeli military law in the occupied territories, stone throwing can carry sentences from several months up to 10 years in prison, depending on circumstances such as injury caused or repeat offenses. Even minors have been sentenced to lengthy terms, sometimes disproportionate to the act, as part of a policy to deter dissent.

Why Are These Prisoners Held?

Many detainees are incarcerated not for violent crimes but for political reasons or low-level offenses linked to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The use of administrative detention without due process, the imprisonment of women often linked to activism, and the harsh sentencing for stone throwing all reflect Israel’s broader security and deterrence policies in the occupied territories.
Political and Symbolic Implications. Despite the rhetoric framing the hostages’ return as purely humanitarian, the reciprocal release of these Palestinian prisoners highlights the political realities of the exchange. The deal acknowledged Hamas’s leverage, even if Israeli officials publicly downplayed the equivalency of the prisoners involved. The careful orchestration of the exchange—batches, ratios, vetos—demonstrates a mutual, negotiated process rather than a one-sided humanitarian concession. This dynamic is critical to understand: while Israeli discourse emphasized the innocence of hostages and portrayed Palestinians broadly as “terrorists,” many of the Palestinian prisoners freed were non-violent detainees or held without formal charges. This reveals a stark asymmetry in public narratives versus actual practice, underscoring the complexity and political sensitivity surrounding the first tranche of hostage releases.

----------

If anyone wants to dispute the above, go ahead, and if not we will simply accept the above at face value. I will wait 24 hours before returning to this subject.


1. “Hamas treated hostages humanely” - A grotesque lie

Your claim: Hostages were treated “relatively well” by Hamas.
Reality: Hostage-taking of civilians is a war crime. Full stop. It’s not a “humane act” just because the victims weren’t executed or some of thrm werent raped. Many of the hostages were:
Children, kept in dark tunnels with little food or medical care
Elderly and injured, denied medication
Malnourished, psychologically broken, and some were forced to record propaganda videos


Even the Red Cross was denied access to the hostages. That alone is a blatant violation of international law.
This isn’t “humane treatment”, it’s terrorist leverage, plain and simple

2. “No reports of sexual abuse” - Willfully ignorant or lying

Reality: There is growing and credible documentation of rape, sexual mutilation, and gender-based violence during the October 7 massacre, including:
Forensic evidence from ZAKA and Israel’s national center for forensic medicine
Eyewitness testimonies from survivors and first responders
Ongoing investigations by UN Women, Doctors Without Borders, and Human Rights Watch

That the hostages released early didn’t report sexual abuse does not invalidate what happened on and after October 7, especially to women who were killed, not held.
Denying this is on the level of Holocaust denial. Ignoring or dismissing rape as a political tool is not “critical thinking”. It is disgusting apologism for jihadist brutality.


3. “Israel dehumanizes Palestinians” - Pot calling the kettle black

Reality:
Some Israeli politicians have used inflammatory language, and were rightly criticized from within Israel
Hamas’s entire ideology, from its founding charter to recent speeches, calls for the total extermination of Jews
Hamas leaders literally demand “slaughtering the Jews hiding behind stones and trees”

Israel has Arab members of Parliament, Arabic-speaking TV channels, and an independent press

Meanwhile, in Gaza:
Palestinian Authority and Hamas-controlled media regularly air content glorifying murder, calling Jews “pigs” and “apes”
Children are taught to hate Jews in schoolbooks

Who’s really doing the dehumanizing?

4. “Palestinian prisoners were just women and kids” - Disingenuous minimization

Facts:
Many of the released minors were involved in violent acts, including attempted stabbings and Molotov attacks
“Stone throwing” has killed people. Examples:
Asher Palmer and his infant son, murdered in 2011 by stone throwers
Adele Biton, a toddler who died after being hit by a rock


As for administrative detention:
It is legal under international law in situations of security threat
Israel’s use can be criticized for frequency, but it is not equivalent to torture camps
Meanwhile, Hamas executes people without trial for suspected collaboration


This is a false equivalence based on selective outrage.

5. “The exchange proves Hamas’s strength” - Wrong. It proves Israel’s morality

Reality:
Israel exchanges 1,000 prisoners for one civilian not because Hamas is strong
It does so because Israel places supreme value on human life
Hamas celebrates death. Israel builds shelters, invests in Iron Dome, and drops warning leaflets to civilians

Hamas uses civilians as shields, and even stores weapons under schools and hospitals

That’s not strength. That’s cowardice.


6. Moral inversion at its worst


Hamas launched this war with a coordinated massacre of civilians
Women were raped. Families were executed in front of each other
Israel responded with its legal and moral right to defend its citizens
The hostage exchange was not about equality. It was a rescue mission

Trying to paint Hamas as humane because they didn’t torture toddlers while ignoring that they kidnapped them from their beds is not nuance. It is evil dressed as empathy.

You want justice? Start by not excusing rapists murderers and war criminals with wall of garbage text just because they hand out crackers in a tunnel.

This post was edited by Many_Names on Jul 24 2025 02:29pm
Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Nov 4 2021
Gold: 0.00
Jul 24 2025 04:01pm
This post is a violation of the site rules and appropriate action was taken.

1. “Hamas treated hostages humanely” - A grotesque lie

Your claim: Hostages were treated “relatively well” by Hamas.
Reality: Hostage-taking of civilians is a war crime. Full stop. It’s not a “humane act” just because the victims weren’t executed or some of thrm werent raped. Many of the hostages were:
Children, kept in dark tunnels with little food or medical care
Elderly and injured, denied medication
Malnourished, psychologically broken, and some were forced to record propaganda videos


Even the Red Cross was denied access to the hostages. That alone is a blatant violation of international law.
This isn’t “humane treatment”, it’s terrorist leverage, plain and simple

2. “No reports of sexual abuse” - Willfully ignorant or lying

Reality: There is growing and credible documentation of rape, sexual mutilation, and gender-based violence during the October 7 massacre, including:
Forensic evidence from ZAKA and Israel’s national center for forensic medicine
Eyewitness testimonies from survivors and first responders
Ongoing investigations by UN Women, Doctors Without Borders, and Human Rights Watch

That the hostages released early didn’t report sexual abuse does not invalidate what happened on and after October 7, especially to women who were killed, not held.
Denying this is on the level of Holocaust denial. Ignoring or dismissing rape as a political tool is not “critical thinking”. It is disgusting apologism for jihadist brutality.


3. “Israel dehumanizes Palestinians” - Pot calling the kettle black

Reality:
Some Israeli politicians have used inflammatory language, and were rightly criticized from within Israel
Hamas’s entire ideology, from its founding charter to recent speeches, calls for the total extermination of Jews
Hamas leaders literally demand “slaughtering the Jews hiding behind stones and trees”

Israel has Arab members of Parliament, Arabic-speaking TV channels, and an independent press

Meanwhile, in Gaza:
Palestinian Authority and Hamas-controlled media regularly air content glorifying murder, calling Jews “pigs” and “apes”
Children are taught to hate Jews in schoolbooks

Who’s really doing the dehumanizing?

4. “Palestinian prisoners were just women and kids” - Disingenuous minimization

Facts:
Many of the released minors were involved in violent acts, including attempted stabbings and Molotov attacks
“Stone throwing” has killed people. Examples:
Asher Palmer and his infant son, murdered in 2011 by stone throwers
Adele Biton, a toddler who died after being hit by a rock


As for administrative detention:
It is legal under international law in situations of security threat
Israel’s use can be criticized for frequency, but it is not equivalent to torture camps
Meanwhile, Hamas executes people without trial for suspected collaboration


This is a false equivalence based on selective outrage.

5. “The exchange proves Hamas’s strength” - Wrong. It proves Israel’s morality

Reality:
Israel exchanges 1,000 prisoners for one civilian not because Hamas is strong
It does so because Israel places supreme value on human life
Hamas celebrates death. Israel builds shelters, invests in Iron Dome, and drops warning leaflets to civilians

Hamas uses civilians as shields, and even stores weapons under schools and hospitals

That’s not strength. That’s cowardice.


6. Moral inversion at its worst


Hamas launched this war with a coordinated massacre of civilians
Women were raped. Families were executed in front of each other
Israel responded with its legal and moral right to defend its citizens
The hostage exchange was not about equality. It was a rescue mission

Trying to paint Hamas as humane because they didn’t torture toddlers while ignoring that they kidnapped them from their beds is not nuance. It is evil dressed as empathy.

You want justice? Start by not excusing rapists murderers and war criminals with wall of garbage text just because they hand out crackers in a tunnel.


Source: "Trust me bro" - Institute of cucks in Israel

Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Jul 24 2025 04:10pm
Jewish people have done nothing but try to destroy Christianity for the last 2000 years

They opened the gates of Toledo (capital city of the Christian Visigothic Kingdom) to the Muslim horde, they cultured plague rats and sent them all across Europe, they slaughtered 100 million Christians in Eastern Europe, they funded and aided the Muslims during the Crusades while financially persecuting Christians (so that the Knights Templar had to start banking themselves), they devised a false ideology (bolshevism) to weaken and corrupt the innocent

They're genocidal by nature and creed, they are sadistic and revel in the suffering of others

This post was edited by El1te on Jul 24 2025 04:20pm
Member
Posts: 5,377
Joined: Feb 5 2022
Gold: 2,200.11
Jul 24 2025 04:25pm
Macron says France will recognize a Palestinian state at UN General Assembly this fall
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/france-macron-palestine-state-recognition-1.7593315

My position has always been that the IDF acted like a bunch of retarded brutes in gaza. I mostly back their actions when dealing with iran and its proxies, but too many women and children have been slaughtered in the strip.

They really gota start dialling it back and up the humanitarian endeavours. Its obvious that the rest of the world will turn a blind eye to what the idf does in syria,iran, and lebanon, but theres a growing resentment thats seriously starting to fester here in yhe west that the israelis aren't paying attention to. And we all know that if uncle sam ever even slightly reduces its military support for israel, they are finished.
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Jul 24 2025 04:29pm
Macron says France will recognize a Palestinian state at UN General Assembly this fall
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/france-macron-palestine-state-recognition-1.7593315

My position has always been that the IDF acted like a bunch of retarded brutes in gaza. I mostly back their actions when dealing with iran and its proxies, but too many women and children have been slaughtered in the strip.

They really gota start dialling it back and up the humanitarian endeavours. Its obvious that the rest of the world will turn a blind eye to what the idf does in syria,iran, and lebanon, but theres a growing resentment thats seriously starting to fester here in yhe west that the israelis aren't paying attention to. And we all know that if uncle sam ever even slightly reduces its military support for israel, they are finished.


They won't relent until they lose US support, which requires a fairly thorough purge of the government - the good news is that we're getting there, it's a bipartisan issue among young people. And if they lose US support they of course know they are finished, and they'll go for the Samson option. The US will need to strike them first, which would be difficult to pull off with so many Jewish moles.

France & friends are all irrelevant weaklings, they bark and bark merely to cynically drum up political support to distract from their failure. Useful idiots I suppose

This post was edited by El1te on Jul 24 2025 04:30pm
Member
Posts: 56,310
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,268.61
Jul 24 2025 05:30pm
1. “Hamas treated hostages humanely” - A grotesque lie

Your claim: Hostages were treated “relatively well” by Hamas.
Reality: Hostage-taking of civilians is a war crime. Full stop. It’s not a “humane act” just because the victims weren’t executed or some of thrm werent raped. Many of the hostages were:
Children, kept in dark tunnels with little food or medical care
Elderly and injured, denied medication
Malnourished, psychologically broken, and some were forced to record propaganda videos


Even the Red Cross was denied access to the hostages. That alone is a blatant violation of international law.
This isn’t “humane treatment”, it’s terrorist leverage, plain and simple

2. “No reports of sexual abuse” - Willfully ignorant or lying

Reality: There is growing and credible documentation of rape, sexual mutilation, and gender-based violence during the October 7 massacre, including:
Forensic evidence from ZAKA and Israel’s national center for forensic medicine
Eyewitness testimonies from survivors and first responders
Ongoing investigations by UN Women, Doctors Without Borders, and Human Rights Watch

That the hostages released early didn’t report sexual abuse does not invalidate what happened on and after October 7, especially to women who were killed, not held.
Denying this is on the level of Holocaust denial. Ignoring or dismissing rape as a political tool is not “critical thinking”. It is disgusting apologism for jihadist brutality.


3. “Israel dehumanizes Palestinians” - Pot calling the kettle black

Reality:
Some Israeli politicians have used inflammatory language, and were rightly criticized from within Israel
Hamas’s entire ideology, from its founding charter to recent speeches, calls for the total extermination of Jews
Hamas leaders literally demand “slaughtering the Jews hiding behind stones and trees”

Israel has Arab members of Parliament, Arabic-speaking TV channels, and an independent press

Meanwhile, in Gaza:
Palestinian Authority and Hamas-controlled media regularly air content glorifying murder, calling Jews “pigs” and “apes”
Children are taught to hate Jews in schoolbooks

Who’s really doing the dehumanizing?

4. “Palestinian prisoners were just women and kids” - Disingenuous minimization

Facts:
Many of the released minors were involved in violent acts, including attempted stabbings and Molotov attacks
“Stone throwing” has killed people. Examples:
Asher Palmer and his infant son, murdered in 2011 by stone throwers
Adele Biton, a toddler who died after being hit by a rock


As for administrative detention:
It is legal under international law in situations of security threat
Israel’s use can be criticized for frequency, but it is not equivalent to torture camps
Meanwhile, Hamas executes people without trial for suspected collaboration


This is a false equivalence based on selective outrage.

5. “The exchange proves Hamas’s strength” - Wrong. It proves Israel’s morality

Reality:
Israel exchanges 1,000 prisoners for one civilian not because Hamas is strong
It does so because Israel places supreme value on human life
Hamas celebrates death. Israel builds shelters, invests in Iron Dome, and drops warning leaflets to civilians

Hamas uses civilians as shields, and even stores weapons under schools and hospitals

That’s not strength. That’s cowardice.


6. Moral inversion at its worst


Hamas launched this war with a coordinated massacre of civilians
Women were raped. Families were executed in front of each other
Israel responded with its legal and moral right to defend its citizens
The hostage exchange was not about equality. It was a rescue mission

Trying to paint Hamas as humane because they didn’t torture toddlers while ignoring that they kidnapped them from their beds is not nuance. It is evil dressed as empathy.

You want justice? Start by not excusing rapists murderers and war criminals with wall of garbage text just because they hand out crackers in a tunnel.


You're responding to aspects of the broader conflict, whereas my post focused narrowly on the prisoner exchange. i.e. its terms, ratios, and the profiles of those released. It made no claims about the morality of either side, nor did it excuse any atrocities. Noting the section where you did make a relevant argument, i.e. stone throwing etc. I will see what I can find re: the type of Palestinians released (i.e. what crimes they committed). will revert tomorrow its late here.
Member
Posts: 50,748
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,146.00
Jul 24 2025 06:36pm
The countries already tinged with anti-semitism want to reward Hamas with all its political objectives as a reward for massacring a thousand Jews
France wasn't willing to recognize Palestine as state until Hamas acted by slaughtering men and babies and taking women as sex slaves.
Palestinians would have continued to languish as a unrepresented stateless people, and Hamas will secure them international recognition through the effectiveness of their wanton bloodshed and the international community's approval of their terrorism.

Of course Hamas will continue to attack aid shipments and try to sabotage food deliveries to try to induce an artificial famine. Israel has thousands of food trucks lined up, the UN won't agree to distribute them while menaced by Hamas, and Hamas will shoot at crowds. Because the more Palestinians that starve, the more likely other countries will take after France's example and throw their support behind Hamas. We're 14 years removed from the start of the Syrian war and how Putin weaponized the west's self-flagellating embrace of regressive muslim migrants to destabilize the EU. But the lesson wasn't learned, the same failings were engrained even deeper and the EU is even more cucked than ever
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1146414651466146714681646Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll