Quote (PKSubban @ Nov 15 2015 06:04am)
Either way having any certitude is not reasonable, maybe by "belief" you don't imply any certitude and language barrer may got me wrong here.
so, how freely may i substitute (this) and (that) by any kind of thought that might be available to me? could i say that i'm agnostic about homeopathy working even if i find no reason whatsoever to believe in homeopathy?
i don't know about certitude being that good. for example, we all talk and act according to things that are not absolutely certain. for example, i might decide to walk across the zebra crossing without having absolute and total knowledge that no car is not going to cross me. this wouldn't count as that important in terms of total knowledge, but it's knowledge nonetheless.
or i could believe that the chain of causality will be going on even tomorrow, even though i can't be absolutely and fully certain of it. i fully understand that it will go on, but there might be no compelling reason for anyone to believe that it will. yet, causal skeptics are awfully rare.
or i might expect to be going on about my day without giving the slightest thought to UFO sightings being real even though there is no absolute certainty that they absolutely never won't happen until Scully and Mulder show up at my doorstep.
i've got no reason to totally believe in these things. i'd even go as far as to say that i don't believe in them ever happening, more or less convincingly depending upon the case. i'm not fully convinced that Scully and Mulder won't ever possibly show up at my door, and in fact i sometimes think about Scully showing up at my doorstep.. but this does not mean that it will ever happen as far as my understanding of the world is correct.
This post was edited by Gastly on Nov 14 2015 09:46pm