Quote (fender @ Aug 30 2017 02:18pm)
your gross misrepresentations and generalisations of my arguments speak for themselves. resorting to those in order to defend your emperor just disqualifies your flimsy excuses even more.
also, criticising trump for attacking and trying to delegitimise outlets critical of him while peddling falsehoods himself and not criticising demonstrably dishonest networks just because they are flattering him is not an "absurd insinuation". but i guess if your feelings tell you otherwise, that's what you have to do...
EVEN MORE!
Same shtick, different post.
Piling on the unjustified claims and names. It might make yourself feel better, but it doesnt win any arguments or make any of it true.
Ironically you blatantly misrepresent why i called something an "absurd insinuation" while you are complaining about supposed misrepresentations.
A UN figure is pondering whether trump is inciting violence towards the media and pretending his criticism of the media is conflicting with free speech/press. Thats absurd.
You chose to complain about imaginary false equivalencies instead of recognizing this. remember?
This post was edited by cambovenzi on Aug 30 2017 12:42pm