Quote (fender @ 3 Jul 2022 07:11)
until that point, somewhere in the distant future, people will have gotten used to republican taliban rule, women will have been sufficiently demonised and marginalised, and right wing propaganda will have "convinced" even the most "critical" conservative that forcing births (though considered a crime against humanity by the UN) is the only way to "save" america.
republicans have already found yet another way to "win" elections they lost by millions, and even when they lose the electoral college by present standards: the conservative activist judges on the supreme court will (in october, moore v harper) rule to strengthen the insurrectionists' arguments concerning the electoral count act, meaning that states with republican legislatures just hand their electoral votes to republican candidates even when the democrat won the state - handing republicans lost elections, like they did for bush v gore.
This is nonsensical garbage. Pointing out that elective abortion is nothing more than murder and "doctors" who make their living performing it are nothing but state sanctioned murderers is not "demonizing women". "The Base" has zero interest in forcing rape victims to carry the child to term. The "news article" absolutely screams "fake news" in it's copypasta format and lack of any details whatsoever.
Republicans did not "lose" the last election that democrats "really won by millions". Remove California, they simply won the election in both popular and electoral vote. Hence WHY there is an electoral college. One state, no matter it's population, can NOT dictate the laws, policies, and regulations of the other 49 states.
Republicans did not "win" or "lose" with the overturning of Roe v Wade. The Supreme Court exists in it's basic function to prevent the federal government from infringing on the rights of the people of the States to be self governing. Dobbs v Jackson aka the abortion of Roe didn't overturn abortion. It simply said the Constitution doesn't say shit about abortion at all, therefore, Constitutionally, according to both the 9th and 10th Amendments, the issue falls to the States.
This is not a question of "activist judges" but simply judges who judge based on the Constitution. The Federal Government does not exist to dictate the day to day living of the States. And a Supreme Court ruling that it has no power to make law is not "activist" but simply "doing it's job". Because the SCOTUS is NOT the lawmaking arm of the government. The Congress is.
It's well past time you shut the fuck up about the subject, German. You neither understand the US Governmental system, nor are impacted.