Quote (Knaapie @ Aug 30 2017 01:00pm)
It's beyond criticizing, it's refraining from any form of responsibility asked by free press. The clear waters did already become a swamp.
Some might even say its inciting violence and in opposition to a free press!!!
Quote (fender)
so instead of explaining why you don't think it's a false equivalence you resort to a lazy "it isn't because there are similarities, and everyone who thinks otherwise has TDS" - and then have the audacity to bitch about other ppl's "unjustified namecalling" - hilarious...
Recognizing the fact that there are obvious pertinent similarities IS explaining why I dont think its a false equivalency
You made a nonsensical unsupported assertion, yet again, when confronted with uncomfortable information that doesnt go along with the
bash trump always, the bigger the better fad.
Quote
except that's not at all what happened, i very much criticised the message, not at all the words you used - another dishonest misrepresentation of my post.
You clearly took issue with how i chose to (accurately) portray the situation.
Quote
also, thanks for providing yet another example as to why your comparison is utterly flawed. while jefferson might have criticised the press, trump just goes after outlets that are critical of him while ignoring press that is demonstrably "fake" but flattering him.
Pointing out differences between Trump and Jefferson is NOT supporting the delusion that its a false equivalence.
The point is not that every action or detail was the same, but that presidents have harshly criticized the media in the past and that it was not a call to violence or unconstitutional.
An overtly obvious and reasonable point, which you have somehow managed to oppose and turn into more bickering nonsense in pursuit of bashing trump and disagreeing with me.
trying to reason with the unreasonable...waste of time.Quote
it is relevant because it contradicts your point that he is, like presidents before him, merely criticising "the press" when in fact he's only criticising the outlets that are critical of him. the fact that you act like you can't make that distinction speaks for itself - just like the fact that you only ever try to "intellectually refute" (that's outright hilarious coming from you) ppl critical of trump and not the blatantly false statements of trump cultists...
He has made numerous comments critical of fake news etc that were not specific to him, and jefferson made numerous comments in support of a free press and against garbage press, especially against press that was hypercritical and libelous towards him.
Both the merit and relevance of your distinction are questionable.
Whether he is responding to media that is critical of him or not is irrelevant to the point, and does not fundamentally change whether he is criticizing the press and its relation to violence/the constitution.
when you've lost the argument, but are still unhappy, just mindlessly repeat "trump cultists" "trump shills" etc etc
then you've won! right?