I WANT MADONNA ARRESTED IMMEDIATELY FOR DISCUSSING CLASSIFIED SECRETS!

Don't you have some photos to be coming up with?

your whole understanding of the nature of reality is whether geocentricity can provide a picture? So really that says your whole belief in ball earth is because they provided you some pixels for your fantasies.

The fact is you can't explain ball earth without explaining gravity and even your greatest AstroPriest doesn't know what it is.




What is gravity? NDT - "UM IDK"

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 20 2016 06:05pm

Pretty fair points.

The Supreme Court selected our president in 2000. If there would have been a Liberal majority on the court, they probably would have ruled that it was constitutional in that case to use different counting standards in different counties, and Gore likely had more votes in Florida. That's not rigging, though, that's a partisan SCOTUS decision. All of that aside, he had more popular votes, and that's undisputed.

The 2016 primaries were "rigged", even though Hillary Clinton did indeed receive more votes. Wikileaks proved collusion between the Clinton campaign and the DNC, but whether that affected the end result of the election is unknown (HRC very likely would have won, but the principle of it all still should matter to us).

There is such a thing as "rigging" an election, but do you think it is going to happen across all or most of the 50 states, including Red states with Red Governors election officers, this election in order to prevent Trump from going to the White House?

What if Clinton beats Trump by 10 million votes and 7 to 8% of the popular vote? Do you think it would be rigged enough to say it changed the outcome of the election?

Just a point of order, the media being on the side of Clinton doesn't mean the election is rigged. An election being rigged means voter fraud on massive scales, vote manipulation, or something along those lines. My guess is that Trump is going to lose by a big enough margin that not even rigging in some counties of some states (which I doubt will even happen) will be enough to change the outcome

No, not my whole understanding. This is simply the most basic element. The easiest proof. Show me a flat Earth. This should be a walk in the park. If the Earth is flat, an object 120 km over the surface should be visible 10000 km away at about 7/10 of 1 degree angle. So floating a weather balloon should be able to get you photos that include a 20000 km diameter circle - enough to fit all of North & South America, Europe, Asia Africa and Australia all in 1 shot. Hop to it.

This post was edited by Santara on Oct 20 2016 06:27pm

The US republic does not elect its president via popular vote.
A lot of the GOP elite and leadership do nothings are still and will forever be mad Trump got the nod via lots of votes of the small people (who the democrats refer to as all dumb uneducated racist homophobic trailer park privileged cis white male hicks - even if they're highly educated gainfully employed gay or lesbian minorities)
A 10% margin is fairly indisputable although it would be interesting if it still resulted in a EC loss

we've never been higher than the Van Allen Belt - so complete pictures of earth are impossible - but even still if photos from balloons 120 miles up show a complete flat surface - that's pretty revealing - that you think if you double the distance it can show 25,000 mile circumference of the complete ball is pretty stupid.

You obviously know nothing about how lenses and perspective works.

there's also this map from 1000 years ago:




I'd also ask you if you think there really a ball in the sky that NYC is built around or is this just a trick of using a very wide angle lense?



This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 20 2016 06:45pm

@ bold: then it's a good thing I never said anything of the sort.

Educate yourself:



e/ so you can get it in high res: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Earth_orbit

The Van Allen belts are 1000+ km over the surface. You can get plenty of space to get a fish eye lens wide angle shot of the whole flat Earth.

Maps are worthless for our proofs. I want a photo.

This post was edited by Santara on Oct 20 2016 06:51pm

There was atomic war in Blade Runner? I think it was just the result of society crumbling from idiots like yourself. That sounds more legit. Also, i dont think you know what proof means because i wasn't using it as proof, but kinda revealing that you think a fantasy film of a hypothetic future is absolute proof, maybe of your buffoonery i suppose.