d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > October Invasion Of Israel
Prev1142414251426142714281641Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 56,266
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Jun 29 2025 10:36am
What an increadibly dishonest post. Reminds me of an angry old german user who used to post here. Coincidentally was also extremely antisemitic


Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
an·ti-Se·mit·ic
/ˌanˌtīsəˈmidik,ˌan(t)ēsəˈmidik/
adjective
adjective: antisemitic
hostile to or prejudiced against Jewish people.
"anti-Semitic remarks were posted on the site"


The post I replied to was made in bad faith, so I won't bother taking any advise from you.


just for visibility.

The conversation we had last week, whereby you suggested critic's of the Israeli Government were overly using the word Anti-Semitic in the Iran thread, I refuted, after fact checking the thread. The above further supports my conclusion as to who uses that word more.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jun 29 2025 10:56am
Member
Posts: 45,717
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Jun 29 2025 10:46am
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
an·ti-Se·mit·ic
/ˌanˌtīsəˈmidik,ˌan(t)ēsəˈmidik/
adjective
adjective: antisemitic
hostile to or prejudiced against Jewish people.
"anti-Semitic remarks were posted on the site"


The post I replied to was made in bad faith, so I won't bother taking any advise from you.


If he is Anti Semitic which at times I think his comments and post might be slightly contentious and at times difficult and might right some people off.

I don't think he is Anti Semitic, there are a lot more people on Pard are that true Anti Semites.

But then again if he is.... what are you going to do about it ?. B)

This post was edited by Hamsterbaby on Jun 29 2025 10:47am
Member
Posts: 56,266
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Jun 29 2025 10:57am
If he is Anti Semitic which at times I think his comments and post might be slightly contentious and at times difficult and might right some people off.

I don't think he is Anti Semitic, there are a lot more people on Pard are that true Anti Semites.

But then again if he is.... what are you going to do about it ?. B)


I am against the Government of Israel as related to its policies in Gaza and the West Bank. The religion of said government is not relevant to the conversation.
Member
Posts: 45,717
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Jun 29 2025 11:00am
I am against the Government of Israel as related to its policies in Gaza and the West Bank. The religion of said government is not relevant to the conversation.


Exactly...you can hate certain extremist mindest or be disgusted with certain extreme ideology but you can absolutely love the people as well.

I mean I can go for example I hate Karl Marx and Noam Chomsky, hell am I Anti Semitic ? :rofl:
Obviously not.

There are bound to be assholes everywhere the world is large, unless you are Samaritans which their number is amongst the low thousands.
The Jewish Diaspora is reasonably huge.

6 to 7 Million in Israel.
8 to 9 Million in USA.
And more worldwide

I haven't even talk about the Black Jews (Ethiopian) and the Chinese Jews (Kaifeng Jews) etc etc.

So being disgusted or at least frustrated with a few selected few and bam Anti Semite. What bullshit is that. :rofl:

This post was edited by Hamsterbaby on Jun 29 2025 11:05am
Member
Posts: 2,294
Joined: Oct 3 2010
Gold: 4,311.90
Jun 29 2025 11:05am
If he is Anti Semitic which at times I think his comments and post might be slightly contentious and at times difficult and might right some people off.

I don't think he is Anti Semitic, there are a lot more people on Pard are that true Anti Semites.

But then again if he is.... what are you going to do about it ?. B)


Rather than dwelling on the antisemitic claim, why not focus on main argument:

Israeli media (Haaretz) : 'It's a Killing Field': IDF Soldiers Ordered to Shoot Deliberately at Unarmed Gazans Waiting for Humanitarian Aid

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-06-27/ty-article-magazine/.premium/idf-soldiers-ordered-to-shoot-deliberately-at-unarmed-gazans-waiting-for-humanitarian-aid/00000197-ad8e-de01-a39f-ffbe33780000

wow that is so inconvenient.


If this report is accurate, someone will and should be held accountable. But the fact that you only ever look for what’s wrong with Israel, while ignoring Hamas’s deliberate crimes and exploitation of civilians, shows clear bias. Real concern for human life means holding both sides to account, not weaponizing tragedies selectively

I also suggest you read the article not just the headline and you’ll see this isn’t official policy. The officer quoted is speaking out because he wants to expose wrongdoing and fix it. That’s the opposite of institutional brutality. Haaretz framed it for shock value, but the substance shows a military trying to confront its own flaws, not endorse them - its not government policy


discredit the source. I understand. This is very common nowadays.

Israel is the most moral country in the world, with the most moral army, it does not target civilians. Well, there are no civilians in Gaza we have been told. Instead Gaza is full of HamaPalastinians apparently. Lets just look the other way when ambulances are repeatedly attacked, then buried, along with their occupants. oh crap, there was a video of that attack? drat! The IDF does not target civilians, and even if they did its just a few bad apples, and only 400 people Palastinians have been shot and killed near the aid stations in the last month, they are barbarians so they dont constitute being called civilians. And besides your source is Haaretz an ultra far left wing of Israel with Radical ideas like "dont kill civilians".

And as for Dresden bombing Tehran in the hour after a ceasefire was agreed? well Donald Trump was just making that up, besides Iran does not have civilians either, apparently.

The simple fact is if TheTimesOfIsrael wanted to debunk the story they would have done their own investigation. They have not, because they know its true. The best way in this day and age to debunk a story, is to not write it.


What an increadibly dishonest post. Reminds me of an angry old german user who used to post here. Coincidentally was also extremely antisemitic



Many_names: Argues this event is not a government policy.
Ferdia: "Israel is the most moral country..." despite no one making this claim, makes a ridiculously dishonest strawman


/edit phone quoting is a pain

This post was edited by WiziLiCe on Jun 29 2025 11:06am
Member
Posts: 45,717
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Jun 29 2025 11:07am
Many_names: Argues this event is not a government policy.
Ferdia: "Israel is the most moral country..." despite no one making this claim, makes a ridiculously dishonest strawman



Rather than dwelling on the antisemitic claim, why not focus on main argument:


He has been focusing on the Argument since this thread started. But I do agree that at times he is frustrated and his opinions might exasperate certain Pardians because that is just how debates are.
And that little German twerp you are talking about aka Fender and his little french is not longer on JSP.

They ran away with their tail in between their legs. B)

Now those two are the real Anti Semites.
There is one more from White Power guild and his is still having his 30%.

This post was edited by Hamsterbaby on Jun 29 2025 11:08am
Member
Posts: 2,294
Joined: Oct 3 2010
Gold: 4,311.90
Jun 29 2025 11:12am
^whitesouned just for visibility.

The conversation we had last week, whereby you suggested critic's of the Israeli Government were overly using the word Anti-Semitic in the Iran thread, I refuted, after fact checking the thread. The above further supports my conclusion as to who uses that word more.


What a brilliant conclusion. Maybe you missed this, but I didn't call you antisemitic for the post I was replying to, genius
Member
Posts: 56,266
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Jun 29 2025 11:21am
What a brilliant conclusion. Maybe you missed this, but I didn't call you antisemitic for the post I was replying to, genius


perhaps you should read again what you wrote.
Member
Posts: 17,996
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 29 2025 11:22am
Rather than dwelling on the antisemitic claim, why not focus on main argument:










Many_names: Argues this event is not a government policy.
Ferdia: "Israel is the most moral country..." despite no one making this claim, makes a ridiculously dishonest strawman


/edit phone quoting is a pain


It’s true, the article itself quotes the officer saying this isn’t official government policy and puts the blame on a senior commander.
Member
Posts: 2,294
Joined: Oct 3 2010
Gold: 4,311.90
Jun 29 2025 11:30am
perhaps you should read again what you wrote.


You are suggesting that I use the word antisemitic simply due to the fact that you are a critic of Israel. That is your assumption. Again in bad faith. Keep at it

/edit
This all goes over the piss poor argument you made which started this exchange.

This post was edited by WiziLiCe on Jun 29 2025 11:32am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1142414251426142714281641Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll