Quote (TiStuff @ Jun 17 2021 04:36pm)
thats a long winded way of finally admitting it was the sidney powell case we talked about and not the election fraud case. even so it still surprises me.
i didnt say we spoke about the trump case against dominion, even tho we did also speak about that case and the affidavits, i said we spoke about the evidence of the court case.
i wouldnt have to be so long winded if u understood basic legal concepts.
did u forget the day of the court case where we talked about that whacky blonde IT lady who appeared drunk? or the evidence Powell presented on TV which was also in her briefs?
u forget a lot of stuff.
see:
Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 16 2021 04:39pm)
All of the evidence the trump campaign had was submitted to the court, AND can be seen publicly. that's standard for any court case, it's called evidentiary discovery. both sides must present ALL of the evidence they have before the court cast makes it to court.
again, i repeat, every single piece of evidence the trump campaign had was submitted to the judges that threw the court case out.
this is how Rudy and Sydney tricked people that dont understand how court works. not just legit courts, or corrupt courts, but all courts in america. its not an episode of some hack TV show, there are no evidence bombshells. this is why 90%+ of cases are plea bargains, the DA shows the criminal they have all of the evidence to prove their guilt, so they take a deal.
Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 16 2021 05:12pm)
If they have new evidence we may see it in court again. or a new standing to appear in a different court.
but ALL of the evidence Sydney Powell and Rudi G had was presented to court. all of it was handed over. none of it was covered up by them getting thrown out of court.
have you googled "evidentiary discovery" yet? my guess is no.
did u really forget? remember us talking about their demand to move the case to texas, etc? u must have forgot.
u still have yet to even respond to these bolded.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Jun 17 2021 03:41pm