Which is partially true, but something that could of been just the same without starting the war to begin with that caused oil and fertilizer prices to moon.
Even if they give up most of their enriched uranium, to me that's not that major. They have the know-how and if they ever wanted to kick back up the enrichment they will retain that capacity.
I'm not sure how Israel looks at the outcome on the horizon and isn't thinking this is pretty bad.
Correct, he ended a war unsuccessfully that he started.
On the israel side it seems most plausible to me that they just wildly miscalculated how the war would go. Israel likely thought they could pressure us to join by simply telling us our targets would be at risk once they struck. thats as far as they got correct. They likely thought that Trump would then respond to damaged bases and bombed allies far more harshly. Not with nuclear, but with more. Maybe Netanyahu even got gassed up by Trump about our missile stockpiles with false numbers, Trump loves to exaggerate. They likely also thought Trump would commit to ground troops to more severely take out missile platforms and even potentially topple the regime quickly. basically i think in their calculus they hoped for it to become a Syria like failed state. they im sure knew we wouldnt occupy. But if it was broken enough they'd get a LOT of legroom. honestly they dont fear nuclear weapons, and never really have, thats always been a red herring.
so trump and the israelis failed to predict pretty much anything beyond the first few days. Hormuz is just one of several miscalculations. They only got like 10-30% of the missile platforms, and none of the major manufacturing sites. They're likely at or near pre-war levels of missile stockpiles and still have many platforms with which to launch them. we took out a navy that they didnt even care about and they never had a real air force. so even our "wins" are moot.