d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Help Me Understand Atheism
Prev11314151617Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 645Replies: 164Track Topic
Member
Posts: 299
Joined: May 12 2022
Gold: 8.00
Warn: 10%
#141
May 13 2022 09:04pm
Quote (Skinned @ May 13 2022 11:00pm)
At least he isn't claiming the Christian god is real.


Atheism is cringe. Imagine thinking the Christian God doesn't exist. Lul.
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
#142
May 13 2022 09:08pm
Quote (Ephesians61213 @ May 13 2022 08:00pm)
Yeah. That's called a deductive argument, dummy. Thanks for demonstrating that you don't know what a circular argument is.

I bet you think if P, then Q. P. Therefore, Q is a circular argument too, lmao.


If p is true then q. If q is true then p.
Member
Posts: 299
Joined: May 12 2022
Gold: 8.00
Warn: 10%
#143
May 13 2022 09:12pm
Quote (Sioux @ May 13 2022 11:08pm)
If p is true then q. If q is true then p.



1. If P, then Q.
2. P.
C: Therefore, Q.

omgz 1 and 2 go together dey dis is a circular arrgument!!!! lolollol
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
#144
May 13 2022 09:20pm
Quote (Ephesians61213 @ May 13 2022 08:12pm)
1. If P, then Q.
2. P.
C: Therefore, Q.

omgz 1 and 2 go together dey dis is a circular arrgument!!!! lolollol



Except your using p as there's no non designed objects to say the universe is designed which means there's no non designed objects
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#145
May 13 2022 09:21pm
Quote (Ephesians61213 @ May 13 2022 10:01pm)
We don't know if biological processes are undesigned. So, that doesn't work either. Got anymore? Lmao. You didn't fully understand my original argument, did you?


It's not on me to show that they aren't designed. It's on you to show they are.

Quote (Ephesians61213 @ May 13 2022 10:21pm)
No, here's the argument again

1. We have plenty of examples of apparently designed structures and processes (buildings, video games, computers, etc.) that we know are in fact designed.

2. We have no examples of apparently designed structures and processes that are in fact not designed.

3. The universe is apparently designed.

C. Therefore, it's more plausible than not that the universe is yet another example of an apparently designed structure or process that is in fact designed.


2 and 3 are not true.

Come at me bro.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on May 13 2022 09:23pm
Member
Posts: 299
Joined: May 12 2022
Gold: 8.00
Warn: 10%
#146
May 13 2022 09:21pm
Quote (Sioux @ May 13 2022 11:20pm)
Except your using p as there's no non designed objects to say the universe is designed which means there's no non designed objects


No, here's the argument again

1. We have plenty of examples of apparently designed structures and processes (buildings, video games, computers, etc.) that we know are in fact designed.

2. We have no examples of apparently designed structures and processes that are in fact not designed.

3. The universe is apparently designed.

C. Therefore, it's more plausible than not that the universe is yet another example of an apparently designed structure or process that is in fact designed.
Member
Posts: 299
Joined: May 12 2022
Gold: 8.00
Warn: 10%
#147
May 13 2022 09:22pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ May 13 2022 11:21pm)
It's not on me to show that they aren't designed. It's on you to show they are.


No, here's the argument again.

1. We have plenty of examples of apparently designed structures and processes (buildings, video games, computers, etc.) that we know are in fact designed.

2. We have no examples of apparently designed structures and processes that are in fact not designed.

3. The universe is apparently designed.

C. Therefore, it's more plausible than not that the universe is yet another example of an apparently designed structure or process that is in fact designed.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#148
May 13 2022 09:23pm
Quote (Ephesians61213 @ May 13 2022 10:22pm)
No, here's the argument again.

1. We have plenty of examples of apparently designed structures and processes (buildings, video games, computers, etc.) that we know are in fact designed.

2. We have no examples of apparently designed structures and processes that are in fact not designed.

3. The universe is apparently designed.

C. Therefore, it's more plausible than not that the universe is yet another example of an apparently designed structure or process that is in fact designed.


Except 2 and 3 aren't true. We have things that are apparently designed, but weren't, and the universe itself does not have the appearance of design.

So your argument is garbage.

Come at me multi.
Member
Posts: 299
Joined: May 12 2022
Gold: 8.00
Warn: 10%
#149
May 13 2022 09:27pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ May 13 2022 11:23pm)
We have things that are apparently designed, but weren't


Like?

Quote
and the universe itself does not have the appearance of design.


Yes it does. This is one of the reasons why the simulation hypothesis is picking up steam. You'd have to be a tard to think the universe doesn't look designed.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#150
May 13 2022 09:39pm
Quote (Ephesians61213 @ May 13 2022 10:27pm)
Like?
Yes it does. This is one of the reasons why the simulation hypothesis is picking up steam. You'd have to be a tard to think the universe doesn't look designed.


Prove that the universe looks designed.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11314151617Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact