Quote (Handcuffs @ 12 Sep 2021 13:27)
Am I not allowed to take it because you own it?
In the Communist sense, no. You're not allowed to take it because the government has rationed it to me, and not you. Likewise, I could not take your bread and milk because the government issued it to you.
I would be very hesitant to consider "government rations" as property at all. Consumables? Sure. One of the key features of property ownership is choice. In Communism, however, distribution is not based on what you choice to receive, but what the government chooses to provide you. You do not have the right to trade your excess or unwanted for someone else's alternative consumable, nor do you have the right to "sell" your rationed end products, because in the end, that rationed end product is still property of the people of [insert communist shithole here].
This is why 3M was blocked from shipping PPE to the US early last year. It didn't matter that it was US wealth, engineering methods, or US paid labor that produced these products. They were produced in China, therefore belong to the people of China. 3M had the option to sell to the Chinese at the government-dictated price, or have both the product and production facilities seized.
Now, it's very easy to say, "China isn't true communist!" and that's true, to a point. It's harder to point at the USSR as not true communist, which is why they're the tried and true example.
The most basic issue with Communism, which is a very utopian worldview, is that it's not possible in a "pure" form due to human nature. The majority will not abide by the rules unless there is enforcement, and the majority are unable to defend themselves from said enforcement. At that point, whoever leads that enforcement, ends up with ultimate power over the populace. Hence why all forms of communism ultimately lead to dictatorship.