I was right. They abuse abuse kids more.

The study was also dishonest about the exact number.

Youre like a woman jesus christ.

no, you said they SEXUALLY abuse kids more.

then posted a study about nonsexual abuse. that was cooked af. and havent produced a better study since. havent even tried. even though ive called you on it dozens of times.

you're a liar, no one in this entire subforum worthy of respect respects you. because you're the tiny man who cried wolf.

I mean your opinions about UBI are even shittier but...

oh u wanna go there? like when u said we were going to rebel and fight the robots?

GL John Connor.

but ty confirm, goaded once again into silence by ur most classic shit claim gone sideways.

how on earth would you know this.. you've never met one

It was a meme from a dune book

Only in the US


I like it though.. Forces ppl to use less, when power is expensive. Giving ppl the freedom to only buy cheap and when used properly, store it for the more expensive days. It buffers out peak energy needs in the system without a government intervention, free market yaah ^^. I'm actually expecting this will make ppl consider having a backup system when using this product, which is good for the energy system in general

A bit of a problem is that having an energy buffer in Texas was not likely to be needed very often, and thus the expenses don't outweigh a possible week of horror in the far future, until it happens.



Wild Willy was prepared ^

take care not dying of CO intoxication

It's a cheap ass hillbilly way to mitigate such a crisis for sure and there are better solutions, this is one of the cheapest ones, indeed having its own risks. You can also have a power wall, fossil electric or hot air generator, warm water boilers for heating systems or even the wood indoor stove. But in any case, if you go for a potentially volatile energy price system as this company did: Then it should be emphasized that this could become extremely expensive during a crisis if you don't have a backup system. This could imo be made mandatory through legislation, or subsidized in order to support libertarian local energy storage or communist micro grids.

In general you'd like a system to not be so locally vulnerable and usually it's cheaper to shut down large energy consumers (factories) and financially compensate them, to compensate for having a bad grid.. Dunno that much about the complete system in Texas to judge about that though ^

Brief google search indicated failing to weatherproof the infra is the source of the power outtage. Why do you bend over backwards trying to blame green energy sources for it in a failed attempt to own the libs?



In fact, what happened this week in Texas was "unfortunate, but not unforeseen," said Francis Bradley, president and CEO of the Canadian Electricity Association, which represents electricity utilities and companies across Canada.

He said a review following a previous extreme freeze in 2014 identified the problems that devastated the state this week and recommended steps such as winterizing generating plants. But upgrades take time.

The problem wasn't just lack of time, but the fact Texas is a fully deregulated electricity market that doesn't necessarily have the same central long-term planning authorities that exist in Canada, Bradley said.

"The market signals don't necessarily move in the right direction to facilitate these kinds of long-term investments that are required."

Tom Seng, director of the School of Energy Economics, Policy and Commerce at the University of Tulsa, summed up the utilities' perspective in that context: "Up until now, it's been an issue of, 'Well, we don't think that's worth it to ratepayers for what might be a very infrequent weather event.'"