d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Remember, Its Illegal To Possess These Emails
Prev11314151617127Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 15 2020 10:30am
Quote (IgoSoHard @ 15 Oct 2020 11:11)
So in your echo chamber world Trump “bringing his family into the WH” is worse than a foreign company paying the son of the VP $50,000 a month to sit on their board for direct access to his father ? Seems a little TDS


lol as I predicted on the first page of this thread the entire lefty #klantifa militia is here hurling hail mary reasons why orange man bad, and they’re all because of the actions of biden and his son!

and like clockwork: https://fox4kc.com/news/two-biden-campaign-staffers-test-positive-for-covid-19/
Member
Posts: 40,248
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 5,737.99
Oct 15 2020 10:33am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 15 2020 10:13am)
If they want to pay Hunter Biden 50k a month to get political connections I really couldn't care less. That's the kind of thing that literally every single company does around the entire world.

The question is if this resulted in Biden doing something for the gain of his family that doesn't also benefit the United States.

So, yes ? You think a foreign company paying the son of the VP $50,000 a month for a position he has no business being in, strictly for access to his dad is way worse, “by a country mile” than “Trump letting his kids into the WH”

That’s TDS.

You’re also doing the very thing you & the left criticize Trump supporters for doing.

Trump or someone in the campaign does “x” - something that while legal, may be kinda sketchy, or something that probably shouldn’t be happening

The right - okay ? It’s not illegal & it happens all the time, all over the world.

The left -You’re rationalizing corrupt behavior so you don’t have to criticize, you’re just making excuses.

Now it’s Biden’s son did “x” - something that while legal, may be kinda sketchy, or sketching that probably shouldn’t be happening

The left - okay ? It’s not illegal & it happens all the time, all over the world
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Oct 15 2020 10:40am
Quote (IgoSoHard @ Oct 15 2020 09:33am)
So, yes ? You think a foreign company paying the son of the VP $50,000 a month for a position he has no business being in, strictly for access to his dad is way worse, “by a country mile” than “Trump letting his kids into the WH”

That’s TDS.

You’re also doing the very thing you & the left criticize Trump supporters for doing.

Trump or someone in the campaign does “x” - something that while legal, may be kinda sketchy, or something that probably shouldn’t be happening

The right - okay ? It’s not illegal & it happens all the time, all over the world.

The left -You’re rationalizing corrupt behavior so you don’t have to criticize, you’re just making excuses.

Now it’s Biden’s son did “x” - something that while legal, may be kinda sketchy, or sketching that probably shouldn’t be happening

The left - okay ? It’s not illegal & it happens all the time, all over the world


the R don't care
the L don't care
vote
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Oct 15 2020 11:02am
The amount of damage control and whataboutism in this thread is staggering. It may just be time to admit that Uncle Joe got his hand caught in the cookie jar.
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 15 2020 11:05am
Quote (bogie160 @ Oct 15 2020 12:02pm)
The amount of damage control and whataboutism in this thread is staggering. It may just be time to admit that Uncle Joe got his hand caught in the cookie jar.


damage control implies damage, the GOP acting like this will shift votes doesnt mean it will.

no one fucking cares, we can debate the morality of that but we can't continue acting like this will have the same effect Comey's HRC email announcement did. it won't, this is the same proof that Biden's son is an overprivileged druggie and not much more that we already flushed out a few years back.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 15 2020 11:05am
Member
Posts: 54,184
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Oct 15 2020 11:16am
Quote (thesnipa @ 15 Oct 2020 19:05)
damage control implies damage, the GOP acting like this will shift votes doesnt mean it will.

no one fucking cares, we can debate the morality of that but we can't continue acting like this will have the same effect Comey's HRC email announcement did. it won't, this is the same proof that Biden's son is an overprivileged druggie and not much more that we already flushed out a few years back.


I largely agree, BUT the censorship by social media companies will fire up the Republican base even more.
Member
Posts: 20,253
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,267.97
Oct 15 2020 11:16am
ITT: It matters when it's about your guy, but not when it's about my guy.
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Oct 15 2020 11:17am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 15 2020 01:05pm)
damage control implies damage, the GOP acting like this will shift votes doesnt mean it will.

no one fucking cares, we can debate the morality of that but we can't continue acting like this will have the same effect Comey's HRC email announcement did. it won't, this is the same proof that Biden's son is an overprivileged druggie and not much more that we already flushed out a few years back.


Disagree. Proof that Biden murdered children is unlikely to sway Icemage or Thor are this point, but swing voters in battleground states are more malleable. They've already shifted camps several times already.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Oct 15 2020 11:19am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 15 2020 01:16pm)
I largely agree, BUT the censorship by social media companies will fire up the Republican base even more.


A vote is a vote no matter how blathering they already are.
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 15 2020 11:22am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 15 2020 12:16pm)
I largely agree, BUT the censorship by social media companies will fire up the Republican base even more.


it's what they promised to do after 2016, eliminate information that is misleading and attempting to sway elections.

the problem is when they said they were gonna do this people looked at it like a Rorschach test, dems were tickled pink thinking it meant they would banish russian troll farms, and the GOP looked at it like it was 1984 come at last and their right to free speech was forever gone.

in reality it means trimming the fat on sweeping trends that they as liberal people deem potentially misleading. i still dont see a smoking gun here, its a fizzle, but the GOP will treat it like Mt. St. Helens.

also in real reality it was dumb to really take a hard stance on it by the social media giants because removing the posts gave them more legitimacy than they deserve, and it was unlikely to sway voters even if it was massively oversold. now that they're censoring it may actually sway more voters. if i was a GOP anti censorship person i might see this situation as bad, but the trump team themselves should be tickled pink. paint Jack Dorsey as the supreme Orwellian overlord and enjoy the free press as people google search to find out what it is and why it was removed, largely coming across the oversold articles.

Quote (bogie160 @ Oct 15 2020 12:17pm)
Disagree. Proof that Biden murdered children is unlikely to sway Icemage or Thor are this point, but swing voters in battleground states are more malleable. They've already shifted camps several times already.



yes things like covid handling has caused shifts, rich guy has rich son who likes coke isnt it. i think you guys are so excited at the thought it might sway votes you've oversold yourselves. this isnt gonna break anything because covid smashed it to pieces. anyone who went team biden due to covid would vote for a corpse right now to get trump out.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 15 2020 11:23am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11314151617127Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll