d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Portland Antifa Shooting
Prev1131415161743Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Aug 31 2020 09:29am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 31 2020 10:21am)
True, but that's not the point. The point is that political leaders cant occupy themselves with every fringe group or movement out there, their attention has to mostly go toward the large-scale problems.

If you add up all the Neo-Nazi rallies of the last 4 years, both the number of events and the number of participants will not even come close to the number of riots and rioters we have seen in the wake of BLM protests over the last 3 months. Similarly, the number of people who died during these recent protests by far exceeds the number of people killed by white supremacist or cops over the entirety of Trump's presidency. Additionally, deadly attacks by white supremacist attacks as well as neo-nazi rallies are absolutely slammed by the media and all of mainstream politics, while large parts of the media and American institutions are supporting the current movement despite the violence that's coming out of their events.


Nobody is asking Trump to occupy himself. A single statement of "Yes, I condemn the neo nazis" would have been sufficient. Instead he waffled back and forth, saying "good people at the rally" when it was an explicitly white supremacist rally, then after pressure saying "I condemn white supremacy, but there were good people on both sides". It actually looks worse for Trump that he wouldn't outright condemn these groups when, as you say, the media has slammed them, his own party slammed them, and he was pressured to slam them by his own party. Your own argument as to how they were handled by the public at large actually makes Trump's actions worse.

As for the BLM protests, you have to take the full context. They peacefully protested for years and got nothing out of it. They are fighting against an abuse that absolutely exists, and has a direct and unbroken chain back to the same abuse they suffered during their fight for civil rights, and the protests have been peaceful for most days with mostly separate riots, and has had many instances of the police outright targeting the peaceful groups and journalists who are clearly separate. Not in all cases mind you, but there have been clear police abuse against the protests from day one.

I don't necessarily see these two things as directly comparable, because they are historically on exact opposite sides. The Neo-Nazi and KKK stuff is directly on the side of the oppressors that the BLM and Antifa movements are fighting against. KKK and Neo-Nazi have historical baggage whereas BLM's short history was peaceful until recently. Etc. Etc. I don't think direct comparisons between these things are useful.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Aug 31 2020 09:32am
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Aug 31 2020 09:31am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Aug 31 2020 08:06am)
Yep, I've just been eating this up.



There's another difference. The KKK is predicated on oppression of races. Antifa, BLM, etc. are predicated on fixing racial problems. You might disagree with their methods, but fundamentally their motivations are not in the same league of shittiness as groups like the KKK or white supremacists, and they are responding to a continued problem that stems directly from the same problems that occurred during the civil rights marches and this only happened after years of peaceful action resulting in nothing getting done.

Also, your point is weakened by the fact that we had literal Neo-Nazi rallies, attacks at a high profile rally, and have had things like shootings of black churches by white supremacists.

My point is that there's a lot of factors that cut against your argument, both directly (violence vs violence) and indirectly (motivations, peaceful history vs violent history, condemning violence)


The resistance you see proves their point. Their methods feel like a personal attack. Because trump clan has the racist element and they get triggered and feel motivated to fight it not listen. SAME THING I say about trump.

Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Aug 31 2020 09:33am
lefty klantifa member/blm organization volunteer goes and murders someone, and the usual suspects are bringing up the other democrat klan (the kkk) as an excuse?? what the hell lmfao

obligatory:

Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Aug 31 2020 09:39am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Aug 31 2020 08:29am)
Nobody is asking Trump to occupy himself. A single statement of "Yes, I condemn the neo nazis" would have been sufficient. Instead he waffled back and forth, saying "good people at the rally" when it was an explicitly white supremacist rally, then after pressure saying "I condemn white supremacy, but there were good people on both sides". It actually looks worse for Trump that he wouldn't outright condemn these groups when, as you say, the media has slammed them, his own party slammed them, and he was pressured to slam them by his own party. Your own argument as to how they were handled by the public at large actually makes Trump's actions worse.

As for the BLM protests, you have to take the full context. They peacefully protested for years and got nothing out of it. They are fighting against an abuse that absolutely exists, and has a direct and unbroken chain back to the same abuse they suffered during their fight for civil rights, and the protests have been peaceful for most days with mostly separate riots, and has had many instances of the police outright targeting the peaceful groups and journalists who are clearly separate. Not in all cases mind you, but there have been clear police abuse against the protests from day one.

I don't necessarily see these two things as directly comparable, because they are historically on exact opposite sides. The Neo-Nazi and KKK stuff is directly on the side of the oppressors that the BLM and Antifa movements are fighting against. KKK and Neo-Nazi have historical baggage whereas BLM's short history was peaceful until recently. Etc. Etc. I don't think direct comparisons between these things are useful.


It goes WAY back
In the South, however, the economics that drove the creation of police forces were centered not on the protection of shipping interests but on the preservation of the slavery system. Some of the primary policing institutions there were the slave patrols tasked with chasing down runaways and preventing slave revolts, Potter says; the first formal slave patrol had been created in the Carolina colonies in 1704. During the Civil War, the military became the primary form of law enforcement in the South, but during Reconstruction, many local sheriffs functioned in a way analogous to the earlier slave patrols, enforcing segregation and the disenfranchisement of freed slaves.
Member
Posts: 54,184
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Aug 31 2020 09:42am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 31 Aug 2020 17:29)
Nobody is asking Trump to occupy himself. A single statement of "Yes, I condemn the neo nazis" would have been sufficient. Instead he waffled back and forth, saying "good people at the rally" when it was an explicitly white supremacist rally, then after pressure saying "I condemn white supremacy, but there were good people on both sides". It actually looks worse for Trump that he wouldn't outright condemn these groups when, as you say, the media has slammed them, his own party slammed them, and he was pressured to slam them by his own party. Your own argument as to how they were handled by the public at large actually makes Trump's actions worse.


Trump has issued statements condemning neo nazis. He just didnt do it in a way that would have confirmed the narrative the media was trying to tell in that moment, namely that neo-nazism is on the rise and an imminent threat.

Quote
As for the BLM protests, you have to take the full context. They peacefully protested for years and got nothing out of it. They are fighting against an abuse that absolutely exists, and has a direct and unbroken chain back to the same abuse they suffered during their fight for civil rights, and the protests have been peaceful for most days with mostly separate riots, and the police outright targeting the peaceful groups and journalists who are clearly separate from the beginning.

I don't necessarily see these two things as directly comparable, because they are historically on exact opposite sides. The Neo-Nazi and KKK stuff is directly on the side of the oppressors that the BLM and Antifa movements are fighting against. KKK and Neo-Nazi have historical baggage whereas BLM's short history was peaceful until recently. Etc. Etc. I don't think direct comparisons between these things are useful.


How exactly have those pale pasty privileged antifa folks "suffered abuse" by a racist America? Their violence is directly undermining the progress that BLM and the push for racial justice initially made after George Floyd's murder. With that kind of allies, the black community doesnt need enemies.

If the protests had remained peaceful like they initially were, if the looters, arsonists and the antifa dorks had stayed home, this movement would have picked up more and more momentum and propelled Biden/Democrats to a landslide victory coupled with trifecta control. Instead, at the current rate, they're gonna give Trump the opening he needs to win reelection.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Aug 31 2020 09:42am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Aug 31 2020 09:50am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 31 2020 10:42am)
Trump has issued statements condemning neo nazis. He just didnt do it in a way that would have confirmed the narrative the media was trying to tell in that moment, namely that neo-nazism is on the rise and an imminent threat.


Trump has issued statements, after refusing to do so in a way that David Duke has explicitly said he considers a sign of support. I've been over this about 10 times now. When king-KKK says "When you refuse to condemn then wait 3 days to condemn I see that as a wink since you can't outwardly show support", and then he keeps doing that, it means at least he's being irresponsible with his rhetoric and at worst is making a calculated showing of implicit support. Neither of which we should accept from his office.

Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 31 2020 10:42am)
How exactly have those pale pasty privileged antifa folks "suffered abuse" by a racist America? Their violence is directly undermining the progress that BLM and the push for racial justice initially made after George Floyd's murder. With that kind of allies, the black community doesnt need enemies.

If the protests had remained peaceful like they initially were, if the looters, arsonists and the antifa dorks had stayed home, this movement would have picked up more and more momentum and propelled Biden/Democrats to a landslide victory coupled with trifecta control. Instead, at the current rate, they're gonna give Trump the opening he needs to win reelection.


Like I said, we can disagree with their methods, but they are different from groups like the KKK in that one has good motivations with questionable methods, and the other is shit all the way down.

If the protests had remained peaceful there's no guarantee anything would have gotten done. We've seen peaceful protests for a long time now. Why would this have been any different? Something something doing the same thing and expecting different results.
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Aug 31 2020 10:07am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Aug 31 2020 11:29am)
Nobody is asking Trump to occupy himself. A single statement of "Yes, I condemn the neo nazis" would have been sufficient. Instead he waffled back and forth, saying "good people at the rally" when it was an explicitly white supremacist rally, then after pressure saying "I condemn white supremacy, but there were good people on both sides". It actually looks worse for Trump that he wouldn't outright condemn these groups when, as you say, the media has slammed them, his own party slammed them, and he was pressured to slam them by his own party. Your own argument as to how they were handled by the public at large actually makes Trump's actions worse.

As for the BLM protests, you have to take the full context. They peacefully protested for years and got nothing out of it. They are fighting against an abuse that absolutely exists, and has a direct and unbroken chain back to the same abuse they suffered during their fight for civil rights, and the protests have been peaceful for most days with mostly separate riots, and has had many instances of the police outright targeting the peaceful groups and journalists who are clearly separate. Not in all cases mind you, but there have been clear police abuse against the protests from day one.

I don't necessarily see these two things as directly comparable, because they are historically on exact opposite sides. The Neo-Nazi and KKK stuff is directly on the side of the oppressors that the BLM and Antifa movements are fighting against. KKK and Neo-Nazi have historical baggage whereas BLM's short history was peaceful until recently. Etc. Etc. I don't think direct comparisons between these things are useful.


Trump did specifically call out neo-nazis / white supremacists and condemned them unequivocally.

I think we should hold Biden to the same standard. Condemn antifa and the "mostly peaceful" protestors unequivocally and stand by actual peaceful protests.

Torching cities and running lynch mobs is oppression. I would go so far as to say that these movements are far worse than KKK rallies where one or two losers show up, because these riots are filled to the brim with poorly educated extremists actively sabotaging public order.
Member
Posts: 54,184
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Aug 31 2020 10:07am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 31 Aug 2020 17:50)
Trump has issued statements, after refusing to do so in a way that David Duke has explicitly said he considers a sign of support. I've been over this about 10 times now. When king-KKK says "When you refuse to condemn then wait 3 days to condemn I see that as a wink since you can't outwardly show support", and then he keeps doing that, it means at least he's being irresponsible with his rhetoric and at worst is making a calculated showing of implicit support. Neither of which we should accept from his office.


When the President of the United States chooses his words and rhetoric based on the opinion of David Duke, he's giving the chief-racist far more influence and power than he deserves. If we seriously expect the president to say "B" whenever David Duke says "A", we effectively turn the president into Duke's lap dog. :rolleyes:

And just for the record: yes, Trump handled this whole episode badly, he could and should have found a way to distance himself from white supremacists more clearly while refusing to play along with the expectations of the liberal media.



Quote
Like I said, we can disagree with their methods, but they are different from groups like the KKK in that one has good motivations with questionable methods, and the other is shit all the way down.

If the protests had remained peaceful there's no guarantee anything would have gotten done. We've seen peaceful protests for a long time now. Why would this have been any different? Something something doing the same thing and expecting different results.

We havent seen peaceful protest at this scale in a long long time. In fact, the last time we saw such a large peaceful protest movement, huge civil rights legislation was passed. Also note how BLM made inroads with white America, getting majority support from them for the first time ever, shortly after Floyd. If you look at the partisan breakdowns, it's clear that BLM must have made inroads with GOP voters during that time. Due to the riots, those gains are now gone.

And last but not least, the politician and party standing in the way of the "progress" on this issue (Trump/the GOP) are very weakened by an external shock (the pandemic and the economic crisis induced by it). There was a real chance that swing voters with "racially conservative" opinions (say the pivotal Obama-Trump voters in the Midwest) would have gone with Biden this time, based on Trump's mishandling of the coronavirus crisis. But not when the alternative is burning cities and violent mobs roaming free because the police is either defunded or held back by woke Democratic mayors and governors.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Aug 31 2020 10:09am
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Aug 31 2020 10:10am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Aug 31 2020 11:50am)

Like I said, we can disagree with their methods, but they are different from groups like the KKK in that one has good motivations with questionable methods, and the other is shit all the way down.

If the protests had remained peaceful there's no guarantee anything would have gotten done. We've seen peaceful protests for a long time now. Why would this have been any different? Something something doing the same thing and expecting different results.


By this rationale fascism has "good motives".

The protesters are burning down cities, impoverishing the local community, encouraging violence against police (another one dead), and killing or trying to kill random people they don't like.

Suffice to say their motives look bad and their methods are atrocious.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Aug 31 2020 10:32am
Quote (duffman316 @ Aug 31 2020 11:26am)
Antifa is part of the left and they are a much greater threat than any alleged facists/nazis. What violence have the nazis inflicted in the past 10 years that can compare to the arson, looting, rape and murder over the last few months?


It's really a dumb comparison. The reason why denouncing Nazis in 2020 isn't a deal is because honestly you could probably count them on your fingers. Like society has moved so far from that ideology that it has become an unspoken understanding that supporting them is objectively wrong. Secondly, they haven't been relevant for decades. Like who the fuck is scared of the KKK in 2020? I'm a foreigner that's a bit on the brown side, I've driven and been around the south, not once did i feel threatened by white supremacists elements. I wouldn't even feel scared if i was there in Charleston walking about because all of those inbred fucks have been tamed by society in what they would actually do to a non typical northern European white.

Meanwhile, Antifa is literally a thing in multiple cities across the states that no one can deny if they're being honest. You talk to some of these people and they very much have a 'if you aren't with me, you're against me' mentality. If you're a small business owner in some of these areas refusing to put up signs or voice support for them you're absolutely getting targeted. Even if you show support it doesn't matter as the mob doesn't always respond in a logical way, that's why you have so much violence against black owned businesses, people, other allies.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Aug 31 2020 10:43am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1131415161743Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll