heh.. http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355937-fbi-informant-blocked-from-telling-congress-about-russia-nuclear









This post was edited by Warlock316 on Oct 18 2017 08:50pm

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/920972261032648705

Well that question answered. But will the media still ignore it?

Interesting first reply to his tweet;

Russia's atomic energy agency (Rosatom) purchased a majority stake in a Canadian company called Uranium One.
The purchase had to be approved, not by Hillary Clinton, but by nine govt agencies. The state dept was one of those nine agencies.
Uranium One accounted for about 20% of U.S. uranium production capacity.
Production capacity is different from the total stock of uranium.
The uranium stocks in the U.S. owned by Uranium One still remains in the U.S. and has not been moved to Russia.
The uranium is still under the same control as it always has been. Uranium One still operates under the same laws and export restrictions.

Fucking facts getting in the way of a perfectly good witch hunt.

Which has nothing to do with this scandal.
The US entered into the deal knowing that Rosatom and Tenex were using bribes and extortion to secure contracts and taking kickbacks. A US trucking company moving around the uranium was taking Russian bribes and on their payroll, vulnerable to extortion. This was hidden from CFIUS and lawmakers and regulators by the FBI

Did you just enter into the thread without reading anything?

This post was edited by Goomshill on Oct 19 2017 08:18am

Collusion confirmed because Pokemon Go, Nazis, and some such stuff.

indeed he did - it's a favorite song and dance of that one

Here's some facts you may have overlooked in you hurry to hide the truth...

Clinton knew about the 2009-2015 investigation into the Russians bribery and extortion and money laundering. So did Mueller and Comey. NONE of these folks told the "nine govt. agencies" about the investigation or the results, BEFORE the deal was approved and signed. THAT is the issue here.

Further, proof of this withholding of information and obstruction was in the hands lof a few courts and the DOJ by 2015 and still no one involved said ...anything.

It wasn't till a few days ago that the documents proving that Russia gave the Clintons $145 million, before the 2010 signing of the Uranium One deal, were released.

THIS is why all the "oh this is fake news" back in 2016 SEEMED valid. It wasn't until those documents proving the Russians bribery and extortion and money laundering were released a few days ago, that we begin to see that...Trump was 100% correct, back in 2016 when he accused Clinton and the Obama administration of wrong doing concerning the Uranium One deal.


SO, for all the latecomers to this topic...I will collect all the articles that came out starting 3 days ago, into one place for your reading pleasure.


http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355957-senate-judiciary-opens-probe-into-obama-era-russian-nuclear-bribery <--- Didn't do this because it's a nothing burger. This is definitely a something burger.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355937-fbi-informant-blocked-from-telling-congress-about-russia-nuclear



/e To be honest...it's best to start on page one and read everything, up until this point. Keep in mind that the documents in question JUST came out a few days ago.

This post was edited by Ghot on Oct 19 2017 08:58am

I dont see this shit in any news since days about this, pretty sure it never existed (no troll)

Btw i dont understand why they still didnt have arrested & jailed/death sentenced GW Bush for treason.

Theres no comparison between:
- Selling basic primary ressource that is not even used for military (posted the stocks evolution)
- Getting elected BECAUSE of external country influence, very very sad.

You sure you're in the right topic?

I'd like to point out how conspicuous it is that even 2 hours after Trump tweeted about it, its still not on any of the MSM (other than fox)
Not even the obligatory "trump tweeted about it" articles they run in 20 seconds after each tweet. Not even hatchet jobs accusing him of pushing an old narrative
The only new sources to join in the festivities are politico ("Trump: Russia uranium deal 'biggest story that Fake Media' ignores") and Huffpo ("Donald Trump Accuses 'Fake Media' Of Not Reporting An Actual Fake News Story"), the latter with the hatchet job article
No ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, WaPo, NYT

This is the new york times.
The NYT are the ones who posted this story:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Now this is their current coverage of their own scoop:
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Anytimes.com+uranium&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A10%2F16%2F2017%2Ccd_max%3A&tbm=