d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Sept 11
Prev1131415161731Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,077
Joined: Feb 20 2005
Gold: 1,300.00
Sep 11 2012 03:36am
Quote (Lifebane99 @ Sep 11 2012 02:33am)
Not sure which side you are on, i assumed you would be a truther.

I tend to side with the truthers, however it's mostly irrelevant to me. tldr, etc.
Member
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Oct 17 2008
Gold: 0.00
Sep 11 2012 03:38am
Quote (Lifebane99 @ Sep 11 2012 11:36am)
If you dont understand how a 900 degree explosion transferred heat to nearby walls and beams then i am not going to waste my time trying any more.


LOL... that is quite detailed. try lighting a firecracker next to an ice cube.
Member
Posts: 25,367
Joined: Apr 30 2010
Gold: 566.22
Sep 11 2012 03:42am
Quote (ZingerSupreme @ Sep 11 2012 07:38pm)
LOL... that is quite detailed. try lighting a firecracker next to an ice cube.


Stupid comparison, one that shows how truly clueless you are.
Member
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Oct 17 2008
Gold: 0.00
Sep 11 2012 03:46am
Quote (Lifebane99 @ Sep 11 2012 11:42am)
Stupid comparison, one that shows how truly clueless you are.


its on the same level as the one in the report you posted.
detailed heat transfer model means
equations that take into account the exact shape of the building, columns, the explosion etc
the fires intensity and distribution
the evolution of the whole process over time until collapse.
such a thing is a 30+ page report by iteself
not a fricking paragraph thats part of an incoherent salad of psuedo science
Member
Posts: 25,367
Joined: Apr 30 2010
Gold: 566.22
Sep 11 2012 03:49am
Quote (ZingerSupreme @ Sep 11 2012 07:46pm)
its on the same level as the one in the report you posted.
detailed heat transfer model means
equations that take into account the exact shape of the building, columns, the explosion etc
the fires intensity and distribution
the evolution of the whole process over time until collapse.
such a thing is a 30+ page report by iteself
not a fricking paragraph thats part of an incoherent salad of psuedo science

So you want a 30 page report on how heat transferred from a large explosion to an enclosed space?
Pseudo science?
When you can even use basic grammar you can talk about science lol.
Member
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Oct 17 2008
Gold: 0.00
Sep 11 2012 03:51am
Quote (Lifebane99 @ Sep 11 2012 11:49am)
So you want a 30 page report on how heat transferred from a large explosion to an enclosed space?


yes!
the explosion was not on the inside however! this silly report assumes out of the blue that 25% of it was inside... on what basis?! maybe only 5% of the explosion went inside!
and u might be confusing heat transfer with the explosion shockwaves... they are different things. a large firecracker can knock an icecube out of place but it wont melt it ;)

Quote
When you can even use basic grammar you can talk about science lol.


im losing an argument so ill divert attention and pretend to be trolling by bringing up grammar

This post was edited by ZingerSupreme on Sep 11 2012 03:53am
Member
Posts: 25,367
Joined: Apr 30 2010
Gold: 566.22
Sep 11 2012 03:53am
Quote (ZingerSupreme @ Sep 11 2012 07:51pm)
yes!
the explosion was not on the inside however! this silly report assumes out of the blue that 25% of it was inside... on what basis?! maybe only 5% of the explosion went inside!



im losing an argument so ill divert attention and pretend to be trolling by bringing up grammar


100% of the plane ended up inside, it would make sense that a large enough percentage of the explosion was inside to weaken the pillars..
You want proof?
THE FUCKING BUILDING FELL DOWN.
Member
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Oct 17 2008
Gold: 0.00
Sep 11 2012 03:56am
Quote (Lifebane99 @ Sep 11 2012 11:53am)
100% of the plane ended up inside, it would make sense that a large enough percentage of the explosion was inside to weaken the pillars..
You want proof?
THE FUCKING BUILDING FELL DOWN.


most of the fuel is in the wings which would have broken on the outside of building exoskeleton as the plane body penetrated in ?
Member
Posts: 25,367
Joined: Apr 30 2010
Gold: 566.22
Sep 11 2012 04:07am
Quote (ZingerSupreme @ Sep 11 2012 07:56pm)
most of the fuel is in the wings which would have broken on the outside of building exoskeleton as the plane body penetrated in ?


Well in my estimate id say that enough fuel exploded inside to damage the structure of the building.
Seeing as the building fell down id say i am right on the money..
Member
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Oct 17 2008
Gold: 0.00
Sep 11 2012 04:17am
Quote (Lifebane99 @ Sep 11 2012 12:07pm)
Well in my estimate id say that enough fuel exploded inside to damage the structure of the building.


funny the report you posted itself says that the explosion shock wave is negligible

Quote (Lifebane99 @ Sep 11 2012 12:07pm)
Seeing as the building fell down id say i am right on the money.


yaya... first thing is first are you willing to admit that the paper you presented doesnt detail the heat transfer or not ?

This post was edited by ZingerSupreme on Sep 11 2012 04:17am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1131415161731Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll