what i remember about the matt gates is a pedo claim. the woman/girl was 17 and the state in question age of consent was 17. i remember posting this and had no response so its assumed it more leftie fraud lying.

Not surprised to see you defending a kiddy diddler. Every accusation is a confession.

Is having a consensual relationship with a 17 year old, in your eyes, equivalent to being a kiddy diddler?

just watched this for the second time.
did he really say what i think he said
he made a deal with aunt hair do nancy. lie to the republicans and the democrats will protect you?
somebody confirm this?

once again there is a fail to back up with data. if the dude is a pedo he needs to be prosecuted and locked up. but taking a leftie frauds word for it,
nope that aint gona happen

Considering you want kids dead and will lie to make it happen I'm not surprised to see you jump in to defend

Not defending anything just asking a question.

If you're 40 chasing 17 year-olds there is absolutely something wrong with you, we can call it kiddy diddler I am okay with that. I mean the rationality part of your brain isn't even fully developed as a 17 year old and you have someone whos is. Pretty easy to manipulate younger people.

Pretty gross to be honest.

round 2

I agree there's something wrong with that scenario.

To note: Matt Gaetz was not 40 when this specific incident occured and he's been married for a few years

Very odd take to say it's equivalent to kiddy diddling (unconsensual sexual assault and/or rape of a pre-pubescent child)

This post was edited by El1te on Oct 4 2023 02:58pm